Mammographic density and histopathologic characteristics of screen-detected tumors in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Moshina, Nataliia ^a   Ursin, Giske ^a,b,c   Hoff, Solveig Roth ^d   Akslen, Lars A ^e,f   Roman, Marta ^a,g   Sebuødegård, Sofie ^a   Hofvind, Solveig ^a,h  

^a CANCER REGISTRY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^f HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^g OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^h OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; mammographic density; tumor characteristics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983450697     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2058460115604340     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307:1394–1404.
2. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081–1087.
3. Nickson C, Kavanagh AM. Tumour size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density. J Med Screen 2009;16:140–146.
4. Aiello EJ, Buist DS, White E, et al. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:662–668.
5. Bertrand KA, Tamimi RM, Scott CG, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res 2013; 15:R104.
6. Harrison DA, Duffy SW, Sala E, et al. Deterministic models for breast cancer progression: application to the association between mammographic parenchymal pattern and histologic grade of breast cancers. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:1113–1118.
7. Sartor H, Borgquist S, Hartman L, et al. Do pathological parameters differ with regard to breast density and mode of detection in breast cancer? The Malmo¨ Diet and Cancer Study. Breast 2015;24:12–17.
8. Masarwah A, Auvinen P, Sudah M, et al. Very low mam-mographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:1875–1882.
9. Hofvind S, Geller B, Vacek PM, et al. Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur J Epidemiol 2007;22: 447–455.
10. Cancer Registry of Norway. Kvalitetssikring i Mammografiprogrammet. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway, 2004.
11. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13:223.
12. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS Mammography Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston. VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.