Do pathological parameters differ with regard to breast density and mode of detection in breast cancer? The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

Breast

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 12-17

  Sartor, Hanna ^a,b   Borgquist, Signe ^a,b   Hartman, Linda ^a,c   Zackrisson, Sophia ^a,b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c Regional Cancer Center   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast density; Mammography; Mode of detection; Pathological tumor characteristics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR VOLUME; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; ONSET AGE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWEDEN; VERY ELDERLY;

AGE OF ONSET; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SWEDEN; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84920371874     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: 15323080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15:1159-1169.
2. Houssami N., Kerlikowske K. The impact of breast density on breast cancer risk and breast screening. Curr Breast Cancer Reports 2012, 4:161-168.
3. Olsen A.H., Bihrmann K., Jensen M.B., Vejborg I., Lynge E. Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer 2009, 100:1205-1208.
4. Boyd N.F., Guo H., Martin L.J., Sun L., Stone J., Fishell E., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. NEngl J Med 2007, 356:227-236.
5. Porter G.J., Evans A.J., Cornford E.J., Burrell H.C., James J.J., Lee A.H., et al. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:676-683.
6. Olsson A., Sartor H., Borgquist S., Zackrisson S., Manjer J. Breast density and mode of detection in relation to breast cancer specific survival: a cohort study. BMC Cancer 2014, 14:229.
7. Yaghjyan L., Colditz G.A., Collins L.C., Schnitt S.J., Rosner B., Vachon C., et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. JNatl Cancer Inst 2011, 103:1179-1189.
8. Reinier K.S., Vacek P.M., Geller B.M. Risk factors for breast carcinoma in situ versus invasive breast cancer in a prospective study of pre- and post-menopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007, 103:343-348.
9. Gill J.K., Maskarinec G., Pagano I., Kolonel L.N. The association of mammographic density with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the multiethnic cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2006, 8:R30.
10. Bertrand K.A., Tamimi R.M., Scott C.G., Jensen M.R., Pankratz V.S., Visscher D., et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res 2013, 15:R104.
11. Aiello E.J., Buist D.S., White E., Porter P.L. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005, 14:662-668.
12. Olsson A., Borgquist S., Butt S., Zackrisson S., Landberg G., Manjer J. Tumour-related factors and prognosis in breast cancer detected by screening. Br J Surg 2012, 99:78-87.
13. Sartor H., Borgquist S., Hartman L., Olsson A., Jawdat F., Zackrisson S. Do mammographic tumor features in breast cancer relate to breast density and invasiveness, tumor size, and axillary lymph node involvement?. Acta Radiol 2014, 10.1177/0284185114532081.
14. Manjer J., Elmstahl S., Janzon L., Berglund G. Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategies. Scand J Public Health 2002, 30:103-112.
15. Manjer J., Carlsson S., Elmstahl S., Gullberg B., Janzon L., Lindstrom M., et al. The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non-participants. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001, 10:489-499.
16. Berglund G., Elmstahl S., Janzon L., Larsson S.A. The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. JIntern Med 1993, 233:45-51.
17. Lagerlund M., Sontrop J., Zackrisson S. Do reproductive and hormonal risk factors for breast cancer associate with attendance at mammography screening?. Cancer Causes Control 2013, 24:1687-1694.
18. Borgquist S., Djerbi S., Ponten F., Anagnostaki L., Goldman M., Gaber A., et al. HMG-CoA reductase expression in breast cancer is associated with a less aggressive phenotype and influenced by anthropometric factors. Int J Cancer 2008, 123:1146-1153.
19. Phipps A.I., Li C.I., Kerlikowske K., Barlow W.E., Buist D.S. Risk factors for ductal, lobular, and mixed ductal-lobular breast cancer in a screening population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19:1643-1654.
20. Mandelson M.T., Oestreicher N., Porter P.L., White D., Finder C.A., Taplin S.H., et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. JNatl Cancer Inst 2000, 92:1081-1087.
21. Ghosh K., Brandt K.R., Sellers T.A., Reynolds C., Scott C.G., Maloney S.D., et al. Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17:872-879.
22. Borgquist S., Jirstrom K., Anagnostaki L., Manjer J., Landberg G. Anthropometric factors in relation to different tumor biological subgroups of postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2009, 124:402-411.
23. Berg W.A., Campassi C., Langenberg P., Sexton M.J. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 174:1769-1777.
24. Ciatto S., Houssami N., Apruzzese A., Bassetti E., Brancato B., Carozzi F., et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 2005, 14:269-275.
25. Nicholson B.T., LoRusso A.P., Smolkin M., Bovbjerg V.E., Petroni G.R., Harvey J.A. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 2006, 13:1143-1149.
26. Joensuu H., Lehtimaki T., Holli K., Elomaa L., Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T., Kataja V., et al. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA 2004, 292:1064-1073.
27. Arpino G., Bardou V.J., Clark G.M., Elledge R.M. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res 2004, 6:R149-R156.
28. Bharat A., Gao F., Margenthaler J.A. Tumor characteristics and patient outcomes are similar between invasive lobular and mixed invasive ductal/lobular breast cancers but differ from pure invasive ductal breast cancers. Am J Surg 2009, 198:516-519.
29. Fernandez B., Paish E.C., Green A.R., Lee A.H., Macmillan R.D., Ellis I.O., et al. Lymph-node metastases in invasive lobular carcinoma are different from those in ductal carcinoma of the breast. JClin Pathol 2011, 64:995-1000.