Mais-E2 model and R2-IBN framework: Port application case;Model mais-E2 oraz struktura R2-IBN: Przypadek zastosowania w porcie

Polish Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 3, Issue , 2011, Pages 111-127

  Abed, Mourad ^a   Alimi, Adel M ^b   Ghedira, Khaled ^c   Hsairi, Lobna ^c   Benabdelhafid, Abdellatif ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SFAX   (Tunisia)

^c Higher Institute of Management of Tunis   (Tunisia)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DU HAVRE   (France)

Author keywords

Argument based negotiation; Cooperation; Extended enterprise; MAIS E2; Multi agent systems; R2 IBN

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983386676     PISSN: 20817452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amgoud, L. et Cayrol, C. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning, 29(2):125–169. (2002).
2. Bench-Capon T.J.M., Dunne P.E., Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence. 171, nos. 10-15, 2007 p.619-641.
3. Boughzala I. Démarche méthodologique de conception de systèmes d’information cooperatifs interagents pour la gestion des connaissances. Thèse de doctorat, Université PARIS VI. 2001.
4. Casillas J., Cordòn O., Herrera F. Magdalena L. Interpretability issues in fuzzy modeling. vol 128, Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg NewYor, 2003.
5. Cayrol C. Traitement de connaissances incomplètes: modélisation de l’incertitude et du raisonnement plausible. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, novembre 1995.
6. Delgrande J. P. et Schaub T., 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2004), Whistler, Canada, June 6-8, 2004, Proceedings. Éditeurs 2004.
7. Goela V. et Raymond J. D. Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortex in inductive and deductive reasoning. Cognition. 2004.
8. 2-IBN: Argumentation Based Negotiation Framework for MAIS-E2 model, 2009.
9. Hsairi L…, Ghédira K., Alimi A. M. et BenAbdellhafid A. Inter-enterprise cooperation among intelligent agents. In the 3rd International Conference on Computing, Communications and Control Technologies CCCT’05, Austin, Texas, USA, volume vol II, 2005 p. 52–57.
10. Hsairi L…, Ghédira K., Alimi A. M. et BenAbdellhafid A. Resolution of conflicts via argument based negotiation: Extended enterprise case. in IEEE International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management (IEEE/SSSM06), pp. 828-833, Université de Technologie de Troyes, France, 2006.
11. Hsairi L., Ghédira K. et Gargouri F. ProMAIS: A multi-agent design for production information system. In Actes des Troisièmes Journées Scientifiques des Jeunes Chercheurs en Génie Electrique et Informatique GEI’2003, Mahdia, Tunisie, 2003 p. 195–200.
12. Hsairi L., Ghédira K. et Gargouri F. ProMAIS: A multi-agent model for production information system. In ICEIS (2), 2004 p. 297–302.
13. Hsairi L., Ghédira K., Alimi A. M. et Benabdelhafid A. ExtEnMAIS: An intelligent model toward an integrated logistic system for an extended enterprise. In IEEE Third International Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices: IEEE SSD’05. 2005.
14. rd International workshop on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence systems, volume 5271 de LNCS/LNAI, 2008 p. 533–542.
15. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 49(2):422–435, 2008.
16. Kraus S., Sycara K. et Evenchik A. Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 104:1–69. 1998.
17. Leila Amgoud S. K. On the generation of bipolar goals in argumentation-based negotiation. In Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P. et Reed, C., éditeurs: Argumentation in Multi- Agent Systems: State of the art survey, pages 192–207. LNAI 3366, 2005.
18. Martinez M. T., Fouletier P., Park K.H., Favrel J. Virtual enterprise-organisation, evolution and control. I. J. of production economics. 74, 2001, p. 225-238.
19. Mas M., Monserrat M. et Torrens J. Modus ponens and modus tollens in discrete implications
20. Pelachaud C., Poggi I., Carolis B. D. et de Rosis F. A reflexive, not impulsive agent. In Agents, 2001 p. 186–187.
21. Rahwan I. Interest-based Negotiation in Multi-Agent Systems. Thèse de doctorat, The University of Melbourne, 2004.
22. Rahwan I., Juan T. et Sterling L. Integrating social modelling and agent interaction through goal-oriented analysis. Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 21(2), 2006.
23. Ramchurn S. D., Jennings N. R. et Sierra C. Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pages 9–17. AAAI Press. 2003.
24. Rao A. S. et Georgeff M. P. Modelling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR’91, 1991 p. 473–484.
25. Sabater J. et Sierra C. Regret: reputation in gregarious societies. In AGENTS’01: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2001, pp. 194–195.
26. st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2002.
27. Takagi T. et Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 15, no 1. 1985.
28. Tsung-Yi C., Knowledge sharing in virtual enterprises via an ontology-based access control approach. Computer in industry. 59, 2008 p.502-519.
29. Zadeh L. A. Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Information Sciences, 178(13):2751–2779. 2008.
30. Zadeh L. Fuzzy sets. Information Control, vol. 8, 1965, p. 338–353.