Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Opitz, Alexander ^a,b   Falchier, Arnaud ^a   Yan, Chao Gan ^a,c   Yeagle, Erin M ^d   Linn, Gary S ^a,e   Megevand, Pierre ^d   Thielscher, Axel ^f,g,h   Deborah, Ross A ^a   Milham, Michael P ^a,b   Mehta, Ashesh D ^d   Schroeder, Charles E ^a,i  

^a NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^b CHILD MIND INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^d FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^e NYU Langone School of Medicine   (United States)

^f HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^g MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^h TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

ⁱ College of Physicians and Surg ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; BRAIN; CEBUS; DEVICES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BRAIN; CEBUS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 84983341163     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep31236     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Paulus, W. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychological rehabilitation 21, 602-617 (2011).
2. Nitsche, M. A. and Paulus, W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of physiology 527 Pt 3, 633-639 (2000).
3. Nitsche, M. A. and Paulus, W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57, 1899-1901 (2001).
4. Ozen, S. et al. Transcranial electric stimulation entrains cortical neuronal populations in rats. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30, 11476-11485 (2010).
5. Ali, M. M., Sellers, K. K. and Frohlich, F. Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates large-scale cortical network activity by network resonance. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 33, 11262-11275 (2013).
6. Helfrich, R. F. et al. Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol 24, 333-339 (2014).
7. Coffman, B. A., Clark, V. P. and Parasuraman, R. Battery powered thought: enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage 85 Pt 3, 895-908 (2014).
8. Kuo, M.-F., Paulus, W. and Nitsche, M. A. Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. NeuroImage 85, Part 3, 948-960 (2014).
9. Bindman, L. J., Lippold, O. C. and Redfearn, J. W. Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents. Nature 196, 584-585 (1962).
10. Bikson, M. et al. Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. The Journal of physiology 557, 175-190 (2004).
11. Reato, D., Rahman, A., Bikson, M. and Parra, L. C. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30, 15067-15079 (2010).
12. Frohlich, F. and McCormick, D. A. Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron 67, 129-143 (2010).
13. Anastassiou, C. A., Perin, R., Markram, H. and Koch, C. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nature neuroscience 14, 217-223 (2011).
14. Logothetis, N. K., Kayser, C. and Oeltermann, A. In vivo measurement of cortical impedance spectrum in monkeys: implications for signal propagation. Neuron 55, 809-823 (2007).
15. Kim, D. et al. Validation of Computational Studies for Electrical Brain Stimulation With Phantom Head Experiments. Brain stimulation 8, 914-925 (2015).
16. Bedard, C., Kroger, H. and Destexhe, A. Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. Biophysical journal 86, 1829-1842 (2004).
17. Bedard, C., Rodrigues, S., Roy, N., Contreras, D. and Destexhe, A. Evidence for frequency-dependent extracellular impedance from the transfer function between extracellular and intracellular potentials: intracellular-LFP transfer function. J Comput Neurosci 29, 389-403 (2010).
18. Michel, C. M. et al. EEG source imaging. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 115, 2195-2222 (2004).
19. Hahn, C. et al. Methods for extra-low voltage transcranial direct current stimulation: current and time dependent impedance decreases. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 124, 551-556 (2013).
20. Dykstra, A. R. et al. Individualized localization and cortical surface-based registration of intracranial electrodes. NeuroImage 59, 3563-3570 (2012).
21. Groppe, D. M. et al. Dominant frequencies of resting human brain activity as measured by the electrocorticogram. NeuroImage 79, 223-233 (2013).
22. Lyons, R. and Reducing F. F. T. Scalloping Loss Errors Without Multiplication [DSP Tips and Tricks]. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE 28, 112-116 (2011).
23. Plonsey, R. and Heppner, D. B. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics 29, 657-664 (1967).
24. Miranda, P. C. Physics of effects of transcranial brain stimulation. Handbook of clinical neurology 116, 353-366 (2013).
25. Gabriel, C., Gabriel, S. and Corthout, E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Physics in medicine and biology 41, 2231-2249 (1996).
26. Struber, D., Rach, S., Trautmann-Lengsfeld, S. A., Engel, A. K. and Herrmann, C. S. Antiphasic 40 Hz oscillatory current stimulation affects bistable motion perception. Brain Topogr 27, 158-171 (2014).
27. Polania, R., Moisa, M., Opitz, A., Grueschow, M. and Ruff, C. C. The precision of value-based choices depends causally on frontoparietal phase coupling. Nature communications 6, 8090 (2015).
28. Vossen, A., Gross, J. and Thut, G. Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (alpha-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment. Brain stimulation 8, 499-508 (2015).
29. Gabriel, S., Lau, R. W. and Gabriel, C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Physics in medicine and biology 41, 2251-2269 (1996).
30. Wagner, T., Valero-Cabre, A. and Pascual-Leone, A. Noninvasive Human Brain Stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9, 527-565 (2007).
31. Wagner, T. et al. Impact of brain tissue filtering on neurostimulation fields: a modeling study. NeuroImage 85 Pt 3, 1048-1057 (2014).
32. Gabriel, C., Peyman, A. and Grant, E. H. Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz. Physics in medicine and biology 54, 4863-4878 (2009).
33. Plonsey, R. Reciprocity Applied to Volume Conductors and the ECG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 10, 9-12 (1963).
34. Rush, S. and Driscoll, D. A. EEG Electrode Sensitivity-An Application of Reciprocity. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on BME-16, 15-22 (1969).
35. Pritchard, W. S. The brain in fractal time: 1/f-like power spectrum scaling of the human electroencephalogram. The International journal of neuroscience 66, 119-129 (1992).
36. Datta, A. et al. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain stimulation 2, 201-207, 207 e201 (2009).
37. Miranda, P. C., Mekonnen, A., Salvador, R. and Ruffini, G. The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation. NeuroImage 70, 48-58 (2013).
38. Radman, T., Su, Y., An, J. H., Parra, L. C. and Bikson, M. Spike timing amplifies the effect of electric fields on neurons: implications for endogenous field effects. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 3030-3036 (2007).
39. Lopez-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Rio-Rodriguez, D. and Fernandez-del-Olmo, M. Inter-individual Variability in Response to Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms. BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation (2014).
40. Wiethoff, S., Hamada, M. and Rothwell, J. C. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. BRAIN STIMULATION: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation (2014).
41. Dmochowski, J. P., Datta, A., Bikson, M., Su, Y. and Parra, L. C. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. Journal of neural engineering 8, 046011 (2011).
42. Opitz, A., Paulus, W., Will, S., Antunes, A. and Thielscher, A. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage 109C, 140-150 (2015).
43. Berenyi, A., Belluscio, M., Mao, D. and Buzsaki, G. Closed-loop control of epilepsy by transcranial electrical stimulation. Science 337, 735-737 (2012).