Validity and measurement precision of the PROMIS physical function item bank and a content validity-driven 20-item short form in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional measures

Rheumatology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2221-2229

  Voshaar, Martijn A H Oude ^a   ten Klooster, Peter M ^a   Glas, Cees A W ^b   Vonkeman, Harald E ^a,c   Taal, Erik ^a   Krishnan, Eswar ^d   Moens, Hein J Bernelot ^e   Boers, Maarten ^f   Terwee, Caroline B ^f   Riel, Piet L C M van ^g   van de Laar, Mart A F J ^a,c  

^a Arthritis Center Twente   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e TWENTEBORG HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

HAQ; Item bank; Physical function; PROMIS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS ASSESSMENT; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE DISABILITY INDEX; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SHORT FORM 20; SHORT FORM 36;

EID: 84983210818     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev265     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:729-40.
2. Oude Voshaar MA, Ten Klooster PM, Taal E, van de Laar MA. Measurement properties of physical function scales validated for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:99.
3. Stucki G, Stucki S, Bruhlmann P, Michel BA. Ceiling effects of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and its modified version in some ambulatory rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:461-5.
4. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1179-94.
5. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during its first two years. Med Care 2007;45(Suppl 1):S3-S11.
6. Oude Voshaar AH, Ten Klooster PM, Glas CAW et al. Calibration of the PROMIS physical function item bank in Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2014;9:e92367.
7. Oude Voshaar MA, Ten Klooster PM, Taal E, Krishnan E, van de Laar MA. Dutch translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PROMIS- physical function item bank and cognitive pre-test in Dutch arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14:R47.
8. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137-45.
9. Fries JF. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Improved HAQ. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, 2009.
10. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short- Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
11. Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:44-8.
12. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45.
13. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212-8.
14. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205-10.
15. Stucki G, Cieza A, Geyh S et al. ICF Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis. J Rehabil Med 2004;44(Suppl):87-93.
16. Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA et al. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R84.
17. Scheerens J, Glas CAW, Thomas SM. Educational Evaluation, Assessment, and Monitoring: a Systemic Approach. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger, 2003.
18. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-63.
19. Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, Schwartz JA. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28:542-7.
20. ten Klooster PM, Taal E, van de Laar MA. Rasch analysis of the Dutch Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index and the Health Assessment Questionnaire II in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1721-8.
21. Kosinski M, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1478-87.
22. Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B. Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:R147.
23. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
24. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, Fries JF, Ware JE. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient- Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:17-33.
25. Fries JF, Bharathi L, Siemons L et al. Extending the floor and the ceiling for assessment of physical function (disability). Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:1378-87.
26. Wolfe F, Michaud K, Pincus T. Development and validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3296-305.