Extending the floor and the ceiling for assessment of physical function

Arthritis and Rheumatology

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1378-1387

  Fries, James F ^a   Lingala, Bharathi ^a   Siemons, Liseth ^a   Glas, Cees A W ^b   Cella, David ^c   Hussain, Yusra N ^a   Bruce, Bonnie ^a   Krishnan, Eswar ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DISABILITY; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; THEORY; TRAINING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ATHLETES; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84899729034     PISSN: 23265191     EISSN: 23265205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.38342     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR,. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 137-45.
2. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD,. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
3. Bruce B, Fries J,. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ): a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 167-78.
4. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY,. The dimensions of health outcomes: the Health Assessment Questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 789-93.
5. Ware JE, Jr., Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SX,. The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI). I. Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Med Care 1999; 37: MS40-50.
6. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 1948.
7. Hays RD, Spritzer KL, Amtmann D, Lai JS, DeWitt EM, Rothrock N, et al. Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 2291-6.
8. Bruce B, Fries J, Lingala B, Hussain YN, Krishnan E,. Development and assessment of floor and ceiling items for the PROMIS physical function item bank. Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15: R144.
9. PROMIS web site. URL: www.nihpromis.org.
10. Khanna D, Krishnan E, Dewitt EM, Khanna PP, Spiegel B, Hays RD,. The future of measuring patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 Suppl 11: S486-490.
11. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, Fries JF, Ware JE,. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 17-33.
12. Krishnan E, Tugwell P, Fries JF,. Percentile benchmarks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire as a quality indicator (QI). Arthritis Res Ther 2004; 6: R505-13.
13. Bruce B, Fries JF, Ambrosini D, Lingala B, Gandek B, Rose M, et al. Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: R191.
14. Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B,. Improved responsiveness of physical function (disability) scales based upon item response theory (IRT) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60 Suppl: S229.
15. Cella D, Chang CH,. A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med Care 2000; 38 Suppl: II66-72.
16. Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D,. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23: S53-7.
17. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP,. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000; 38 Suppl: II28-42.
18. Hays RD, Liu H, Spritzer K, Cella D,. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study. Med Care 2007; 45: S32-8.
19. Fries JF, Cella D, Rose M, Krishnan E, Bruce B,. Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 2061-6.
20. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Bayliss MS, Batenhorst A, Dahlof CG, et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 935-52.
21. Chakravarty EF, Bjorner JB, Fries JF,. Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1426-31.
22. Ware JE, Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Bjorner JB,. Item response theory and computerized adapive testing: implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 2005; 50: 71-8.
23. Glas CA, van der Linden WJ,. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2010; 63: 603-26.
24. Te Marvelde JM, Glas CAW, van Landeghem G, van Damme J,. Application of multidimensional item response theory models to longitudinal data. Educ Psychol Meas 2006; 66: 5-34.
25. Krishnan E, Sokka T, Hakkinen A, Hubert H, Hannonen P,. Normative values for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index: benchmarking disability in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 953-60.
26. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Mitchell DM, Roth SH, Wolfe F, Bloch DA,. Impact of specific therapy upon rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 620-7.
27. Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B,. Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther 2011; 13: R147.