Attention’s Accelerator

Psychological Science

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 790-798

  Reinhart, Robert M G ^a   McClenahan, Laura J ^a   Woodman, Geoffrey F ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attention; cognitive neuroscience; evoked potentials; open materials; visual memory; visual search

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SHORT TERM MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, LONG-TERM; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84983056421     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797616636416     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. N.B.CarlisleJ.T.AritaD.PardoG.F.Woodman (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9315–9322.
2. L.ChelazziA.PerlatoE.SantandreaC.Della Libera (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85, 58–72.
3. R.DesimoneJ.Duncan (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
4. R.A.DianaK.L.VilbergL.M.Reder (2005). Identifying the ERP correlate of a recognition memory search attempt. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 674–684.
5. A.DuarteC.RanganathL.WinwardD.HaywardR.T.Knight (2004). Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 255–272.
6. M.J.FrankB.LoughryR.C.O’Reilly (2001). Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 137–160.
7. J.B.HutchinsonN.B.Turk-Browne (2012). Memory-guided attention: Control from multiple memory systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 576–579.
8. J.LeeS.Shomstein (2014). Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks. Psychological Science, 25, 466–475.
9. G.D.Logan (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376–400.
10. S.J.Luck (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. S.J.LuckE.K.Vogel (2013). Visual working memory: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 391–400.
12. E.MooresL.LaitiL.Chelazzi (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 182–185.
13. P.L.NunezR.Srinivasan (2006). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. C.N.L.OliversJ.C.PetersR.HoutkampP.R.Roelfsema (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.
15. R.M.G.ReinhartL.J.McClenahanG.F.Woodman (2015). Visualizing trumps vision when training attention. Psychological Science, 26, 1114–1122.
16. R.M.G.ReinhartG.F.Woodman (2014a). High stakes trigger the use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 2022–2035.
17. R.M.G.ReinhartG.F.Woodman (2014b). Oscillatory coupling reveals the dynamic reorganization of networks processing reward, maintaining working memory and controlling attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 175–188.
18. R.M.G.ReinhartG.F.Woodman (2015). Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 625–630.
19. T.C.Rickard (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 288–311.
20. D.SotoJ.HodsollP.RotshteinG.W.Humphreys (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 342–348.
21. J.J.SummerfieldJ.LepsienD.R.GitelmanM.M.MesulamA.C.Nobre (2006). Orienting attention based on long-term memory experience. Neuron, 49, 905–916.
22. A.TverskyD.Kahneman (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
23. E.K.VogelM.G.Machizawa (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751.
24. E.K.VogelA.W.McColloughM.G.Machizawa (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503.
25. J.L.VossH.E.SchendanK.A.Paller (2010). Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming. NeuroImage, 49, 2879–2889.
26. G.F.Woodman (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials (ERPs) in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2031–2046.
27. G.F.WoodmanN.B.CarlisleR.M.G.Reinhart (2013). Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?Journal of Vision, 13(3), Article 1. doi:10.1167/13.3.1
28. G.F.WoodmanS.J.Luck (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 121–138.
29. G.F.WoodmanE.K.Vogel (2008). Selective storage and maintenance of an object’s features in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 223–229.