Effect of Circulation Parameters on Functional Status of HepaRG Spheroids Cultured in Microbioreactor

Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

Volumn 161, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 425-429

  Semenova, O V ^a   Petrov, V A ^a   Gerasimenko, T N ^a   Aleksandrova, A V ^a   Burmistrova, O A ^a   Khutornenko, A A ^a   Osipyants, A I ^a   Poloznikov, A A ^a   Sakharov, D A ^a  

^a National Moscow State Research University of Construction   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

HepaRG spheroids; liver on a chip; microcirculation

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LIVER; MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE DOSE; MICROCIRCULATION; TUMOR SPHEROID; BIOREACTOR; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOLOGY; LIVER CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

BIOREACTORS; CELL SURVIVAL; HEPATOCYTES; HUMANS; LIVER; MICROCIRCULATION;

EID: 84982995402     PISSN: 00074888     EISSN: 15738221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10517-016-3430-2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Atac B, Wagner I, Horland R, Lauster R, Marx U, Tonevitsky AG, Azar RP, Lindner G. Skin and hair on-a-chip: in vitro skin models versus ex vivo tissue maintenance with dynamic perfusion. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(18):3555-3561.
2. Esch EW, Bahinski A, Huh D. Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015; 14(4):248-260.
3. Evans DW, Moran EC, Baptista PM, Soker S, Sparks JL. Scale-dependent mechanical properties of native and decellularized liver tissue. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2013; 12(3):569-580.
4. Hwang S. Microcirculation of the liver. Venous Embolization of the Liver. Radiologic and Surgical Practice, Madoff DC, Makuuchi M, Nagino M, Vauthey JN, eds. London, 2011.
5. Kerdok AE, Ottensmeyer MP, Howe RD. Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver. J. Biomech. 2006; 39(12):2221-2231.
6. LeCluyse EL, Witek RP, Andersen ME, Powers MJ. Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2012; 42(6):501-548.
7. Maltseva DV, Khaustova NA, Fedotov NN, Matveeva EO, Lebedev AE, Shkurnikov MU, Galatenko VV, Schumacher U, Tonevitsky AG. High-throughput identification of reference genes for research and clinical RT-qPCR analysis of breast cancer samples. J. Clin. Bioinforma. 2013; 3(1):13.
8. Materne EM, Tonevitsky AG, Marx U. Chip-based liver equivalents for toxicity testing – organotypicalness versus cost-efficient high throughput. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(18):3481-3495.
9. Moran EC, Baptista PM, Evans DW, Soker S, Sparks JL. Evaluation of parenchymal fluid pressure in native and decellularized liver tissue. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2012; 48:303-309.
10. Polacheck WJ, Li R, Uzel SG, Kamm RD. Microfluidic platforms for mechanobiology. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(12):2252-2267.
11. Samatov TR, Shkurnikov MU, Tonevitskaya SA, Tonevitsky AG. Modelling the metastatic cascade by in vitro microfluidic platforms. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 2015; 49(4):21-29.
12. Shi J, Wu X, Surma M, Vemula S, Zhang L, Yang Y, Kapur R, Wei L. Distinct roles for ROCK1 and ROCK2 in the regulation of cell detachment. Cell Death Dis. 2013; 4:e483.
13. Siggers JH, Leungchavaphongse K, Ho CH, Repetto R. Mathematical model of blood and interstitial flow and lymph production in the liver. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2014; 13(2):363-378.