7 Key challenges for visualization in cyber network defense

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 10-November-2014, Issue , 2014, Pages 33-40

  Best, Daniel M ^a   Endert, Alex ^a   Kidwell, Daniel ^b  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Department of Defense ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cyber security; Defense; Visualization

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; FLOW VISUALIZATION;

CYBER SECURITY; DEFENSE; NETWORK DEFENSE; USER STUDY;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84982833860     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2671491.2671497     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. N. Chinchor, K. Cook, and J. Scholtz. Building adoption of visual analytics software. In J. Dill, R. Earnshaw, D. Kasik, J. Vince, and P. C. Wong, editors, Expanding the Frontiers of Visual Analytics and Visualization, pages 509-530. Springer London, Jan. 2012.
2. K. A. Cook, L. Boek-Peddicord, L. Dudney, L. Nowell, and J. Scholtz. Lessons learned and best practices in technology transition. Technical report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2008.
3. A. D'Amico, L. Buchanan, J. Goodall, and P. Walczak. Mission impact of cyber events: Scenarios and ontology to express the relationships between cyber assets, missions, and users. Technical report, Dec. 2009.
4. A. D'Amico and K. Whitley. The real work of computer network defense analysts. In J. Goodall, G. Conti, and K.-L. Ma, editors, VizSEC 2007, Mathematics and Visualization, pages 19-37. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
5. A. D'Amico, K. Whitley, D. Tesone, B. O'Brien, and E. Roth. Achieving cyber defense situational awareness: A cognitive task analysis of information assurance analysts. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(3):229-233, Sept. 2005.
6. G. Fink, C. North, A. Endert, and S. Rose. Visualizing cyber security: Usable workspaces. VizSec, 2009.
7. J. Goodall. Visualization is better! a comparative evaluation. In 6th International Workshop on Visualization for Cyber Security, 2009. VizSec 2009, pages 57-68, 2009.
8. J. Goodall, A. D'Amico, and J. Kopylec. Camus: Automatically mapping cyber assets to missions and users. In IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2009. MILCOM 2009, pages 1-7, 2009.
9. B. J. Grosz. Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. Technical Report 185, AI Center, SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, CA 94025, Apr 1979. Published in Elements of Discourse Understanding: Proceedings of a Workshop on Computational Aspects of Linguistic Structure and Discourse Setting.
10. D. A. Keim, F. Mansmann, J. Schneidewind, J. Thomas, and H. Ziegler. Visual data mining. chapter Visual Analytics: Scope and Challenges, pages 76-90. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
11. J. C. McCarthy, V. C. Miles, and A. F. Monk. An experimental study of common ground in text-based communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '91, pages 209-215, New York, NY, USA, 1991. ACM.
12. G. A. Moore. Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperCollins, Aug. 2002.
13. E. S. Patterson and D. D. Woods. Shift changes, updates, and the on-call architecture in space shuttle mission control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10(3-4):317-346, Dec. 2001.
14. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 336 -343, 1996.
15. D. D. Woods. Visualizing function: The theory and practice of representation design in the computer medium. Technical Report CSEL 2000-TR-02, Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, Institute for Ergonomics, The Ohio State University, February 2000.