Noise in Speech-to-Text Voice: Analysis of Errors and Feasibility of Phonetic Similarity for Their Correction

Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2013, ALTA 2013 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 34-42

  Suominen, Hanna ^a,b   Ferraro, Gabriela ^a,b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS;

ADVERSE EVENTS; CLINICAL PRACTICES; ERROR TYPES; FILLING IN; HAND OVER; INFORMATION FLOWS; VOICE ANALYSIS;

ERRORS;

EID: 84982827241     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. ACSQHC, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2008. Windows into Safety and Quality in Health Care, goo.gl/wB0XZl.
2. ACSQHC, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2012. The OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement, goo.gl/IvS7dc.
3. M Al-Aynati and K Chorneyko. 2003. Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 127(6):721-5.
4. A Alapetite. 2008. Impact of noise and other factors on speech recognition in anaesthesia. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(1):68-77.
5. AMA, Australian Medical Association, 2006. Safe Handover: Safe Patients, goo.gl/9U8wjm.
6. E Devine, S Gaehde, and A Curtis. 2000. Comparative evaluation of three continuous speech recognition software packages in the generation of medical reports. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 7(5):462-8.
7. S Glaser, S Zamanou, and K Hacker. 1987. Measuring and interpreting organizationalculture. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(2):173-98.
8. Minwoo Jeong. 2004. Using higher-level linguistic knowledge for speech recognition error correction in a spoken q/a dialog. In Proceedings of the HLTNAACL special workshop on Higher-Level Linguistic Information for Speech Processing, pages 48-55.
9. S Kaki, E Sumita, and H Iida. 1998. A method for correcting errors in speech recognition using the statistical features of character co-occurrence. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, ACL '98, pages 653-7, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. G Kondrak. 2000. A new algorithm for the alignment of phonetic sequences. In Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference, NAACL 2000, pages 288-95, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. G Kondrak. 2002. Determining recurrent sound correspondences by inducing translation models. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1, COLING '02, pages 1-7, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. W Mackay and G Kondrak. 2005. Computing word similarity and identifying cognates with pair hidden Markov models. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CONLL '05, pages 40-7, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. G Mann and D Yarowsky. 2001. Multipath translation lexicon induction via bridge languages. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies, NAACL '01, pages 1-8, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. J Matic, P Davidson, and Y Salamonson. 2011. Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(1-2):184-9.
15. P Mermelstein. 1976. Distance measures for speech recognition, psychological and instrumental. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 116:374-88.
16. S Meystre, G Savova, K Kipper-Schuler, and J Hurdle. 2008. Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. review. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, pages 128-44.
17. P Ogren. 2006. Knowtator: a proteǵe plug-in for annotated corpus construction. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, pages 273-5, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. L Philips. 1990. Hanging on the Metaphone. Computer Language, 7(12 (December)).
19. L Philips. 2000. The Double Metaphone search algorithm. C/C++ Users Journal, 18(5), June.
20. D Pothier, P Monteiro, M Mooktiar, and A Shaw. 2005. Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. British Journal of Nursing, 14(20):1090-3.
21. M Pucher, A T¨urk, J Ajmera, and N Fecher. 2007. Phonetic distance measures for speech recognition vocabulary and grammar optimization. In Proc. 3rd congress of the Alps Adria Acoustics Association, Graz.
22. S Stemler. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17).
23. H Suominen, J Basilakis, M Johnson, P Sanchez, L Dawson, L Hanlen, and B Kelly. 2013. Preliminary evaluation of speech recognition for capturing patient information at nursing shift changes: accuracy in speech to text and user preferences for recorders. In Proceedings of the 4th International Louhi Workshop on Health Document Text Mining and Information Analysis, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
24. R Zick and J Olsen. 2001. Voice recognition software versus a traditional transcription service for physician charting in the ed. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19(4):295-8.