Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 127, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 721-725

  Al Aynati, Maamoun M ^b   Chorneyko, Katherine A ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANADA; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVICE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MICROPHONE; MONEY; PATHOLOGY; SPEECH; TIME; VOICE;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PATHOLOGY, SURGICAL; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOICE;

EID: 0037904535     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Leeming BW, Porter D, Jackson JD, Bleich HL, Simon M. Computerized radiology reporting with voice data-entry. Radiology. 1981;138:585-588.
2. Robbins AH, Horowitz DM, Srinivasan MK, et al. Speech-controlled generation of radiology reports. Radiology. 1987;164:569-573.
3. Robbins AH, Vincent ME, Shaffer K, Maietta R, Srinivasan MK. Radiology reports: assessment of a 5,000-word speech recognizer. Radiology. 1988;167:853-855.
4. Herman SJ. Accuracy of a voice-to-text personal dictation system in the generation of radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:177-180.
5. Alwang G, Stinson C. Speech recognition: finding its voice. PC Mag. 1998;17(18):191-198.
6. Zafar A, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Continuous speech recognition for clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:195-204.
7. Devine EG, Gaehde SA, Curtis AC. Comparative evaluation of three continuous speech recognition software packages in the generation of medical reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:462-468.
8. Schwartz LH, Kijewski, Hertogen H, Roossin PS, Castellino RA. Voice recognition in radiology reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:27-29.
9. Rosenthal DI, Chew FS, Dupuy DE, et al. Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:23-25.
10. Ramaswamy MR, Chaljub G, Esch O, Fanning DD, vanSonnenberg E. Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: advantages, disadvantages and impact. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:617-622.
11. Chapman WW, Aronsky D, Fiszman M, Haug PJ. Contribution of a speech recognition system to a computerized pneumonia guideline in the emergency department. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000;131-135.
12. Dietz U, Rupprecht HJ, Espinola-Klein C, Meyer J. Automatic report documentation in cardiology using a speech recognition system [abstract]. Z Kardiol. 1996;85:684-688.
13. Posur W. Experiences with a current speech recognition system in creating cardiology reports [abstract]. Herz. 2000;25:627-632.
14. Borowitz SM. Computer-based speech recognition as an alternative to medical transcription. JAMA. 2001;8:101-102.
15. Kovesi T. Dictation software for MDs improving but frustration still part of the program. CMAJ. 1998;158:1059-1060.
16. Kolles H, Feiden W. Computer assisted speech recognition in diagnostic pathology: development of the Dragon Dictate-30 system for documentation [abstract]. Pathologe. 1995;16:439-442.
17. Hendricks WH, Roumin K, Skilton BE, Olzan DJ, Goss GR. The utility and cost effectiveness of voice recognition technology in surgical pathology. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:565-571.
18. Klatt EC. Voice-activated dictation for autopsy pathology. Comput Biol Med. 1991;21:429-433.
19. Niijima H, Ito N, Ogino S, Takatori T, Iwase H, Kobayashi M. Creating language model of the forensic medicine domain for developing an autopsy recording system by automatic speech recognition [abstract; in Japanese]. Nippon Hoigaku Zasshi. 2000;54:414-419.
20. Rosenthal DF, Sokolowski RA, Mayo JB, Quigley KA, Powel RA, Teel MA. A voice-enabled, structured medical reporting system. JAMA. 1997;4:436-441.