Systematic reviews in integrative medicine: A clinician's guide to publication

Advances in Integrative Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 103-109

  Wardle, Jon ^a   Steel, Amie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Endeavour College of Natural Health (Brisbane)   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical research; How to publish; Publication; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; DATA BASE; DATA EXTRACTION; DEPRESSION; DISEASE REGISTRY; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEART INFARCTION; HOMEOPATHY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE; INTERNAL VALIDITY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RURAL AREA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; YOGA;

EID: 84982734849     PISSN: 22129588     EISSN: 22129596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aimed.2015.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Wardle J. Respecting science, respecting tradition: evidence-based care in the integrative medicine professions. Aust. J. Herb. Med. 2015, 27(2):47-55.
2. Druss B., Marcus S. Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2005, 93(4):499-501.
3. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6(7):e1000097. The PRISMA Group.
4. Liberati A., Altman D., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzshe P., Ioannidis J., et al. The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6(7):e1000100.
5. Antman E., Lau J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992, 268(2):240-248.
6. Wardle J., Roseen E. Integrative medicine case reports: a clinicians' guide to publication. Adv. Integr. Med. 2014, 1(3):144-147.
7. Wardle J., Lui C.-W., Adams J. Complementary and alternative medicine in rural communities: current research and future directions. J. Rural Health 2012, 28(1):101-112.
8. Wardle J., Adams J. Indirect and non-health risks associated with complementary and alternative medicine use: an integrative review. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2014, 6(4):409-422.
9. Cramer H., Lauche R., Langhorst J., Dobos G. Yoga for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress. Anxiety 2013, 30:1068-1083.
10. Smith V., Devane D., Begley C., Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2011, 11:15.
11. Jüni P., Witschi A., Bloch R., Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trial for meta-analysis. JAMA 1999, 282:1054-1060.
12. Lüdtke R., Rutten A. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008, 61(12):1197-1204.
13. Cogo E., Sampson M., Ajiferuke I., Manheimer E., Campbell K., Daniel R., et al. Searching for controlled trials of complementary and alternative medicine: a comparison of 15 databases. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011.
14. Moseley A., Sherrington C., Elkins M., Herbert R., Maher C. Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, hooked on evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed. Physiotherapy 2009, 95(3):151-156.
15. DeAngelis C., Drazen J., Frizelle F., Haug C., Hoey J., Horton R., et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004, 292(11):1363-1364.
16. Lefebvre C., Glanville J., Wieland L., Coles B., Weightman A. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?. Syst. Rev. 2013, 2:78.
17. Potthast R., Vervölgyi V., McGauran N., Kerekes M., Wieseler B., Kaiser T. Impact of inclusion of industry trial results registries as an information source for systematic reviews. PLOS ONE 2014, 9(4):e92067.
18. Booth A., Clarke M., Dooley G., Ghersi D., Moher D., Petticrew M., et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2012, 1:2.
19. Pham B., Klassen T., Lawson M., Moher D. Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2005, 58:769-776.
20. Adams D., Wu T., Yasui Y., Aung S., Vohra S. Systematic reviews of TCM trials: how does inclusion of Chinese trials affect outcome?. J. Evid. Based Med. 2012, 5:89-97.
21. Linde K., Ramirez G., Mulrow C., Pauls A., Weidenhammer W., Melchart D. St John's Wort for depression - an overview and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1996, 313(7052):253-258.