Music Information Retrieval

A New Companion to Digital Humanities

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 213-228

  Burgoyne, John Ashley ^a   Fujinaga, Ichiro ^b   Stephen Downie, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio engineering; Classification; Computational musicology; Evaluation; ISMIR; Machine learning; MIREX; Music cognition; Music information retrieval (MIR); Sequence labeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982231254     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118680605.ch15     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Aljanaki, A., Bountouridis, D., Burgoyne, J.A., et al. 2013. Designing games with a purpose for music research: two case studies. In Proceedings of the Games and Learning Alliance Conference. Paris, France.
2. Askenfelt, A. 1976. Automatic notation of played music (status report). Quarterly Progress and Status Report STL-QPSR 17 (1), 1-11.
3. Bainbridge, D., Downie, J.S., and Ehmann, A.F. 2012. Structured audio content analysis and metadata in a digital library. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 431-2.
4. Barlow, H., and Morgenstern, S. 1948. A Dictionary of Musical Themes. New York: Crown.
5. Benetos, E., Dixon, S., Giannoulis, D., Kirchoff, H., and Klapuri, A. 2013. Automatic music transcription: Challenges and future directions. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 41 (3), 407-34.
6. Bernays, M., and Traube, C. 2011. Verbal expression of piano timbre: multidimensional semantic space of adjectival descriptors. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science. Toronto, ON.
7. Bertin-Mahieux, T., Eck, D., and Mandel, M. 2011a. Automatic tagging of audio: the state-ofthe-art. In Machine Audition: Principles, Algorithms, and Systems. Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference, 334-52.
8. Bertin-Mahieux, T., Ellis, D.P.W., Whitman, B., and Lamere, P. 2011b. The millon-song dataset. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Miami, 591-6.
9. Bruder, I., Finger, A., Heuer, A., and Ignatova, T. 2003. Towards a digital document archive for historical handwritten music scores. In Digital Libraries: Technology and Management of Indiginous Knowledge for Global Access, ed. T.M.T. Sembok, H.B. Zaman, H. Chen, S.R. Urs, and S.-H. Myaeng. Berlin: Springer, 411-14.
10. Burgoyne, J.A., Wild, J., and Fujinaga, I. 2011. An Expert Ground-Truth Set for Audio Chord Recognition and Music Analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Miami, 633-8.
11. Burgoyne, J.A., Wild, J., and Fujinaga, I. 2013. Compositional data analysis of harmonic structure in popular music. In Mathematics and Computation in Music: Fourth International Conference, ed. J. Wild, J. Yust, and J.A. Burgoyne. Berlin: Springer, 52-63.
12. Celma, Ò. 2010. Music Recommendation and Discovery: The Long Tail, Long Fail, and Long Play in the Digital Music Space. Berlin: Springer.
13. Chafe, C., Jaffe, D., Kashima, K., Mont-Reynaud, B., and Smith, J.B.L. 1985. Techniques for note identification in polyphonic music. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 399-405.
14. Chandrasekhar, V., Sharifi, M., and Ross, D.A. 2011. Survey and evaluation of audio fingerprinting schemes for mobile query-by-example applications. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Miami, 801-6.
15. Chew, E. 2014. Mathematical and Computational Modeling of Tonality. Berlin: Springer.
16. Collins, T., Arzt, A., Flossmann, S., and Wedmer, G. 2013. SIARCT-CFP: improving precision and the discovery of inexact musical patterns in point-set representations. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Curitiba, Brazil, 549-53.
17. Cont, A. 2011. On the creative use of score following and its impact on research. In Proceedings of the 8th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Padova, Italy.
18. Cook, N. 2005. Towards the compleat musicologist? [Invited talk, Sixth Annual Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, England].
19. Cunningham, S.J., Bainbridge, D., and Downie, J.S. 2012. The impact of MIREX on scholarly research (2005-2010. In Proceedings of the 13th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Porto, Portugal, 259-64.
20. Cuthbert, M.S., and Ariza, C. 2010. music21: a toolkit for computer-aided musicology and symbolic music data. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 637-42. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/music21
21. Dannenberg, R.B., Birmingham, W.P., Pardo, B., et al. 2007. A comparative evaluation of search techniques for query-by-humming using the MUSART testbed. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (5), 687-701.
22. Desain, P., and Honing, H. 1989. The quantization of musical time: a connectionist approach. Computer Music Journal 13 (3), 56-66.
23. Downie, J. S. 2004. The scientific evaluation of music information retrieval systems: Foundations and future. Computer Music Journal 28 (2), 12-23.
24. Downie, J. S. 2008. The Music Information Retrieval Evaluation Exchange (2005-2007): a window into music information retrieval research. Acoustical Science and Technology 29 (4), 247-55.
25. Downie, J.S., West, K., Ehmann, A., and Vincent, E. 2005. The 2005 Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange (MIREX 2005): Preliminary overview. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, UK, 320-3.
26. Downie, J.S., Ehmann, A.F., Bay, M., and Jones, M.C. 2010. The Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange: some observations and insights. In Advances in Music Information Retrieval, ed. Z.W. Rás and A.A. Wieczorkowska. Berlin: Springer, 93-115.
27. Flexer, A., Schnitzer, D., and Schlüter, J. 2012. A MIREX meta-analysis of hubness in audio music similarity. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Porto, Portugal.
28. Fujinaga, I. 1998. Machine recognition of timbre using steady-state tone of acoustic musical instruments. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 207-10.
29. Ghias, A., Logan, J., Chamberlin, D., and Smitch, B.C. 1995. Query by humming: musical information retrieval in an audio database. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia. San Francisco, CA.
30. Goto, M., Yoshii, K., Fujihara, H., Mauch, M., and Nakano, T. 2011. Songle: a web service for active music listening improved by user contribution. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Miami, 311-16.
31. Grey, J.M. 1975. An exploration of musical timbre. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
32. Haas, W.B. de, and Burgoyne, J.A. 2012. Parsing the Billboard chord transcriptions. Technical report UU-CS-2012-18. Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
33. Hall, T. 1975. Some computer aids for the preparation of critical editions of Renaissance music. Tijdschrift van de Vereniging voor Nederlandse Muziekgeschiedenis, 25, 38-53.
34. Hankinson, A., Burgoyne, J.A., Vigliensoni, G., and Fujinaga, I. 2012. Creating a large-scale searchable digital collection from printed music materials. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on the World Wide Web, 903-8.
35. Herrera-Boyer, P. and Gouyon, F., eds. 2013. MIRrors: music information research reflects on its future. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 41 (3) [special issue].
36. Hornbostel, E.M. von. 1906. Phonographierte tunesische Melodien. Sammelbände der Internationalen Musikgesellschaft 8 (1), 1-43.
37. Humphrey, E.J., Bello, J.P., and LeCun, Y. 2013. Feature learning and deep architectures: New directions for music informatics. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 41 (3), 461-81.
38. Huron, D. 2013. On the virtuous and the vexatious in the Age of Big Data. Music Perception 31 (1), 4-9.
39. International Society for Music Information Retrieval. http://www.ismir.net (accessed June 20, 2015).
40. ISMIR Cloud Browser. http://dc.ofai.at/browser (accessed June 20, 2015).
41. Kageyama, T., Mochizuki, K., and Takashima, Y. 1993. Melody retrieval with humming. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 349-51.
42. Kassler, M. 1966. Toward musical information retrieval. Perspectives of New Music 4 (2), 59-67.
43. Kirke, A., and Miranda, E. 2013. An overview of computer systems for expressive music performance. In Guide to Computing for Expressive Music Performance, ed. A. Kirke and E. Miranda. Berlin: Springer, 1-47.
44. Klapuri, A. and Davy, M., eds. 2006. Signal Processing Methods for Music Transcription. New York: Springer.
45. Kowalczyk, S.T., Sun, Y., Peng, Z., et al. 2013. Big data at scale for digital humanities: an architecture for the HathiTrust Research Center. In Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications, ed. H. Wen-Chen and N. Kaabouch. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 207-94.
46. Lee, J.H., and Cunningham, S.J. 2013. Toward an understanding of the history and impact of user studies in music information retrieval. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 41 (3), 499-521.
47. Li, T., Ogihara, M., and Tzanetakis, T., eds. 2012. Music Data Mining. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
48. Lincoln, H.B. 1972. Uses of the computer in music composition and research. In Advances in Computers, ed. M. Rubinoff. New York: Academic Press, 73-114.
49. Logemann, G. 1967. The canon in the Musical Offering of J.S. Bach: an example of computational musicology. In Elektronische Datenverarbeitung in der Muiskwissenschaft, ed. H. Heckmann. Regensburg: Gustave Bosse, 63-87.
50. McAdams, S. 1999. Perspectives on the contribution of timbre to musical structure. Computer Music Journal 23 (3), 85-102.
51. McKay, C., Burgoyne, J.A., Hockman, J., Smith, J.B.L., Vigliensoni, G., and Fujinaga, I. 2010. Evaluating the genre classification performance of lyrical features relative to audio, symbolic and cultural features. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 213-18.
52. McKay, C., and Fujinaga, I. 2005. The Bodhidharma system and the results of the MIREX 2005 Symbolic Genre Classification contest. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, ed. J.D. Reiss and G.A. Wiggins.
53. McNab, R., Smith, S., Witten, I., Henderson, C., and Cunningham, S.J. 1996. Towards the digital music library: tune retrieval from acoustic input. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, 11-18.
54. McVicar, M., Santos-Rodríguez, R., Ni, Y., and De Bie, T. 2014. Automatic chord estimation from audio: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 22 (2), 556-75.
55. Mendel, A. 1969. Some preliminary attempts at computer-assisted style analysis in music. Computers and the Humanities 4 (1), 41-52.
56. MIREX Wiki. http://music-ir.org/mirex.
57. Moorer, J.A. 1975. On the segmentation and analysis of continuous musical sound by digital computer. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
58. Moretti, F. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso.
59. Myers, C.S. 1907. The ethnological study of music. In Anthropological Essays Presented to Edward Burnett Tylor, ed. W.H.R. Rivers, R.R. Marett, and N.W. Thomas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 235-53.
60. Piszczalski, M., and Galler, B.A. 1977. Automatic music transcription. Computer Music Journal 1 (4), 24-31.
61. Pugin, L., Burgoyne, J.A., and Fujinaga, I. 2007a. Reducing costs for digitising early music with dynamic adaptation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Libraries, Budapest, Hungary, 417-74.
62. Pugin, L., Burgoyne, J.A., Eck, D., and Fujinaga, I. 2007b. Book-adaptive and book-dependent models to accelerate digitization of early music [paper, poster and lecture presentation at the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference Workshop on Music, Brain and Cognition]. Whistler, BC.
63. Rás, Z.W. and Wieczorkowska, A.A., eds. 2010. Advances in Music Information Retrieval. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 274. Berlin: Springer.
64. Rebelo, A., Fujinaga, I., Paszkiewicz, F., et al. 2012. Optical music recognition: state-of-theart and open issues. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval 1 (3), 173-90.
65. Risset, J.-C., and Mathews, M.V. 1969. Analysis of musical-instrument tones. 1969 22 (2), 23-30.
66. Salamon, J. 2013. Melody extraction from polyphonic music signals. PhD dissertation, Universitad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
67. Sapp, C.S., Liu, Y.-W., and Selfridge-Field, E. 2004. Search-effectiveness measures for symbolic music queries in very large databases. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval.
68. Schedl, M., Knees, P., and Böck, S. 2011. Investigating the similarity space of music artists on the micro-blogosphere. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Miami, 323-8.
69. Schloss, W.A. 1985. On the automatic transcription of percussive instruments. Ph. D dissertation, Stanford University.
70. Serrà, J., Corral, Á., Boguñá, M., Martín, and Arcos, J.L. 2012. Measuring the evolution of contemporary Western popular music. Nature Scientific Reports 2 (521).
71. Slawson, A.W. 1968. Vowel quality and musical timbre function of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43 (1), 87-101.
72. Smith, J.B.L., Burgoyne, J.A., Fujinaga, I., De Roure, D., and Downie, J.S. 2011. Design and creation of a large-scale database of structural annotations. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Miami, 555-60.
73. Temperley, D. 2001. The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Turnbull, D., Barrington, L., Torres, D., and Lanckriet, G. 2008. Semantic annotation and retrieval of music and sound effects. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 16(2), 467-76.
75. Viro, V. 2011. Peachnote: music score search and analysis platform. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Miami, 359-62.
76. Volk, A., and Honingh, A., eds. 2012. Mathematical and computational approaches to music theory, analysis, composition and performance. Journal of Mathematics and Music 6 (2) [special issue].
77. Watt, H.J. 1924. Functions of the size of interval in the songs of Schubert and of the Chippewa and Teton Sioux Indians. British Journal of Psychology 14 (4), 370-86.
78. Weerkamp, W., Tsagkias, M., and Rijke, M. de. 2013. Inside the world's playlist. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, San Francisco, 2501-4.
79. Whitman, B. 2005. Learning the meaning of music. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
80. Wiering, F. 2007. Can humans benefit from music information retrieval? In Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval: User, Context, and Feedback, ed. S. Machand-Maillet, E. Bruno, A. Nürnberger, and M. Detyniecki. Berlin: Springer, 82-94.
81. Wiering, F. 2012. Balancing computational means and humanities ends in computational musicology. Talk in the Humanities Lectures series at Utrecht University. http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~wieri103/presentations/DHlecture WieringDecember2012.pdf (accessed June 20, 2015).
82. Wold, E., and Blum, T. 1996. Content based classification, search and retrieval of audio. IEEE Multimedia 3 (3), 27-36.
83. Zijl, A.G.W. van, and Sloboda, J. 2011. Performers' experienced emotions in the construction of expressive musical performance: an exploratory investigation. Psychology of Music 39 (2), 196-219.
84. Zivic, P.H.R., Shifres, F., and Cecchi, G.A. 2013. Perceptual basis of evolving Western musical styles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (24), 10034-8.