The broader view: How freelance translators define translation competence

Benjamins Translation Library

Volumn 38, Issue , 2000, Pages 51-62

  Fraser, Janet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982119005     PISSN: 09297316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/btl.38.06fra     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Fraser, J. 1993. "Public accounts: using verbal protocols to investigate community translation". Applied Linguistics 14: 325-343.
2. Fraser, J. 1994. "Translating practice into theory: A practical study of quality in translator training". In C. Picken (ed.), ITI Conference 7: Proceedings. London: Institute of Translation and Interpreting, 130-141.
3. Fraser, J. 1996a. "The translator investigated: Learning from translation process analysis". The Translator 2: 65-79.
4. Fraser, J. 1996b. "T understand the French, but I don't know how to put it into English': Developing undergraduates' awareness of and confidence in the translation process". In P. Sewell and I. Higgins (eds), Teaching Translation in Universities. London: AFLS/CILT, 121-134.
5. Fraser, J. 1997. "Briefing? What briefing? Findings of a survey on the flow of information between clients, translation agencies or companies and freelance translators". ITI Bulletin (June): 13-16.
6. Fraser, J. 1999. "Can't you just translate? Findings of a survey of freelance translators living outside the UK". ITI Bulletin (June): 12-15.
7. Gawn, P. 1985. "Authenticity and quality of translation". Bulletin of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 103-111.
8. Hönig, H. 1993. "Vom Selbstbewußtsein des Übersetzers". In J. Holz-Mänttäri and C. Nord (eds), Traducere Navem: Festschrift für Katharina Reiß zum 70 Geburtstag. (Studia Translatologica 3). Tampere: Tampere University Press. 77-90.
9. Hönig, H. 1998. "Positions, power and practice: Functionalist approaches and translation quality assessment". In C. Schäffner (ed.), Translation and Quality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 6-34.
10. Jääskeläinen, R. 1994. Rigidity or flexibility: approaches to teaching translation. Paper read at 1st International Congress of Translation and Interpreting, Las Palmas: February 1994.
11. Kiraly, D. 1990. Towards a Systematic Approach to Translation Skills Instruction. Ann Arbor: UMI.
12. Klein-Braley, C. 1996. "Teaching translation, a brief for the future". In P. Sewell and I. Higgins eds), Teaching Translation in Universities. London: AFLS/CILT, 15-30.
13. Ladmiral, J.-R. 1979. Traduire: Théorèmes Pour la Traduction. Paris: Payot.
14. Lörscher, W. 1992. "Investigating the translation process". Meta 37(3): 426-439.
15. Lörscher, W. 1993. "Translation process analysis". In Y. Gambier and J. Tommola (eds), Translation and Knowledge: Proceedings of the 1992 Scandinavian Symposium on Translation Theory. Turku: Centre for Translation and Interpreting, 195-221.
16. Nord, C. 1995. "Teaching translation without languages? Some considerations on the structural aspects of translator training". In A. Neubert, G. Shreve and K. Gommlich (eds), Basic Issues in Translation Studies. Kent: Kent State University Press, 283-291.
17. Séguinot, C. 1991. "A study of student translation strategies". In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (ed.), Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies. Tübingen: Narr, 79-88.
18. Vermeer, H. 1989. "Skopos and commission in translational action". In A. Chesterman (ed.), Readings in Translation Theory. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura, 173-200.
19. Wilss, W. 1996. Knowledge and Skills in Translator Behawiour. Amsterdam/Philadephia: Benjamins.