Faculty and staff members' perceptions of effective leadership: Are there differences between women and men leaders?

Equity and Excellence in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 71-81

  Rosser, Vicki J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982113042     PISSN: 10665684     EISSN: 15473457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10665680303501     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abbott, F. C. (Ed.). (1958). Faculty-administrative relationships. Report of a work conference, May 7-9, 1957. Sponsored by the Commission on Instruction and Evaluation of the American Council on Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
2. Alvesson, M., and Berg, P. O. (1992). Corporate culture and organizational symbolism: An overview. New York: W. de Gruyter.
3. Arter, M. H. (1981). Career advancement from institutional research to academic management utilizing institutional research. Paper presented at the 21st annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis, May 17-20. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED205119.)
4. Astin, A. W., and Scherrei, R. A. (1980). Maximizing leadership effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Astin, H. S., and Leland, C. (1991). Women of influence, women of vision: A cross-generational study of leaders and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Ayman, R. (1993). Leadership perception: The role of gender and culture. In M. M. Chemers and R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 137-166). San Diego: Academic.
7. Baldridge, V. J. (Ed.). (1971). Academic governance: Research on institutional politics and decision making. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
8. Bensimon, E. M., and Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning collegiate leadership: Teams and teamwork in higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Bensimon, E. M., Neumann, A., and Birnbaum, R. (1989). Making sense of administrative leadership: The ÒLÕÕ word in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1, Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
10. Billing, Y. D., and Alvesson, M. (1994). Gender, managers, and organizations. New York:W. de Gruyter.
11. Birnbaum, R. (1989). The implicit leadership theories of college and university presidents. Review of Higher Education, 12(2), 125-136.
12. Birnbaum, R. (1992). How academic leadership works: Understanding success and failure in the college presidency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Bowen, W. G., and Shapiro, H. T. (Eds.). (1998). Universities and their leadership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Calas, M. B., and Smircich, L. (1992). Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In M. I. Reed and M. D. Hughes (Eds.). Rethinking organization: New directions in organizational research and analysis (pp. 227-253). London: Sage.
15. Cantor, D. W., and Bernay, T. (1992). Women in power: The secrets of leadership. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Cox, T., Jr. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
17. Deats, S. M., and Lenker, L. T. (Eds.). (1994). Gender and academe: Feminist pedagogy and politics. Lanham, MD: Rowen and Littlefield.
18. Dill, D. D. (1984). The nature of administrative behavior in higher education. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 20(3), 69-99.
19. Dill, W. R. (1980). The deanship: An unstable craft. In D. E. Griffiths and D. J. McCarty (Eds.), The dilemma of the deanship (pp. 261-284). Danville, IL: Interstate.
20. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., and Johnson, B. T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A metaanalysis. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 28(1), 76-102.
21. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., and Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3-22. Faculty and Staff Report. (1999, Fall). Institutional Research Office (university identifiable).
22. Feltner, B. D., and Goodsell, D. R. (1972). The academic dean and conflict management. Journal of Higher Education, 43(9), 692-701.
23. Fincher, C. (1996). Theory and research in administrative leadership. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 11 (pp. 307-336). New York: Agathon.
24. Glazer-Raymo, J. (1999). Shattering the myths:Women in academe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., and Sarros, J. C. (1999). The academic dean: An imperiled species searching for balance. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 717-740.
26. Gould, J. W. (1964). The academic deanship. New York: Institute of Higher Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
27. Griffiths, D. E., and McCarty, D. J. (1980). The dilemma of the deanship. Danville, IL: Interstate.
28. Heck, R. H. (1995). Organizational and professional socialization: Its impact on the performance of new administrators. The Urban Review, 27(1), 31-49.
29. Heck, R. H., Johnsrud, L. K., and Rosser, V. J. (2000). Administrative effectiveness in higher education: Improving assessment procedures. Research in Higher Education, 41(6), 663-684.
30. Heck, R. H., and Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). The assessment of principal performance: A multilevel evaluation approach. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(1), 11-28.
31. Helgesen, S. (1995). The female advantage: WomenÕs ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday Currency.
32. Huberty, C. J. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: JohnWiley.
33. Johnsrud, L. K., and Sadao, K. C. (1998). The common experience of ÒothernessÕÕ: Ethnic and racial minority faculty. Review of Higher Education, 21(4), 315-342.
34. Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73-97.
35. Kezar, A. (2000). Pluralistic leadership. Journal of Higher Education, 71(6), 722-743.
36. Marcoulides, G. A., and Hershberger, S. L. (1997). Multivariate statistical methods: A first course. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Martin, J., Samels, J. E., and Associates. (1997). First among equals: The role of the chief academic officer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Martinko, M. J., and Gardner, W. L. (1987). The leader/member attribution process. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 235-249.
39. Matczynski, T. J., Lasley, T. J., and Haberman, M. (1989). The deanship: How faculty evaluate performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 10-14.
40. McGrath, E. J. (1936). The dean. Journal of Higher Education, 7(8), 427-432.
41. McGrath, E. J. (1999). The dean. Journal of Higher Education, 70(5), 599-605. Reprint.
42. Mills, A. J. (1988). Organization, gender and culture. Organizational Studies, 9(3), 351-369.
43. Moore, K. M., Slaimbene, A. N., Marlier, J. D., and Bragg, S. M.(1983). The structure of presidentsÕand deansÕcareers. Journal of Higher Education, 54(5), 500-515.
44. Morris, V. C. (1981). Deaning: Middle management in academe. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
45. Morrison, A. M., and Von Glinow, M. A. (1997). Women and minorities in management. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 521-541). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
46. Mumby, D. K., and Stohl, C. (1991). Power and discourse in organizational studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse and Society, 2(3), 313-332.
47. Nickeles, E., and Ashcraft, L. (1981). The coming matriarchy: How women will gain the balance of power. New York: Seaview.
48. Powell, G. N. (1988). Women and men in management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. Roaden, A. L. (1970). The college deanship:Anew middle management in higher education. Theory into Practice, 9(4), 272-276.
50. Roesner, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-133.
51. Rosser, V. J., Johnsrud, L. K., and Heck, R. H. (2003). Academic deans and directors: Assessing their effectiveness from individual and institutional perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 1-25.
52. Sagaria, M. A., and Krotseng, M. V. (1986). DeansÕ managerial skills: What they need and what they bring to a job. Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 37(2), 1-7.
53. Seldin, P. (1988). Evaluating and developing administrative performance: A practical guide for academic leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Shakeshaft, C. (1999). The struggle to create a more genderinclusive profession. In J. Murphy and K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (2nd ed., pp. 99-118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.
57. Statham, A. (1987). The gender model revisited: Differences in the management style of men and women. Sex Roles, 16(7-8), 409-429.
58. Symons, G. L. (1986). Coping with the corporate tribe: How women in different cultures experience the managerial role. Journal of Management, 12(3), 379-390.
59. Tucker, A., and Bryan, R. A. (1991). The academic dean: Dove, dragon, and diplomat. New York: American Council on Education, McMillan.
60. Whetten, D. A., and Cameron, K. S. (1985). Administrative effectiveness in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 9(1), 35-49.
61. Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Montez, J., and Nies, C. T.(2001). The changing nature of the academic deanship. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., and Gmelch, W. H. (1999). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. Journal of Higher Education, 70(1), 80-106.