Impact of conflict avoidance responsibility allocation on pilot workload in a distributed air traffic management system

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 55-59

  Ligda, Sarah V ^a   Dao, Arik Quang V ^a   Vu, Kim Phuong ^b   Strybel, Thomas Z ^b   Battiste, Vernol ^a   Johnson, Walter W ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; AIR TRAFFICS; CONFLICT AVOIDANCE; CONVECTIVE WEATHER; EN-ROUTE; FLIGHT DECKS; INPUT TECHNIQUES; INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; PILOT WORKLOAD; SIMULATED FLIGHT; SITUATION AWARENESS; SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AIR TRANSPORTATION;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 79952906251     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829369199236     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Dao, A. Q. V., Vu, K.-P., Battiste, V., Strybel. T. Z., & Johnson, W. W. (in preparation). The impact of air and ground based automated aircraft separation assistance on individual and shared situation awareness. Manuscript in preparation for publication
2. Dao, A. Q., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Vu, K.-P, L., Strybel, T., & Johnson, W. W. (2009). The impact of automation assisted aircraft separation on situation awareness. 13th annual International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, San Diego. CA.
3. Durso, F.T. & Dattel, A. R. (2004). SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA. In S. Banbury & S. Tremblay (Eds.). A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application. (pp. 137-153). Ashgate: Aldershot.
4. Erzberger, H. (2006). Automated Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Control. Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Germany.
5. Granada, S., Dao, A. Q., Wong, D., Johnson, W. W., & Battiste, V. (2005) Development and integration of a human-centered volumetric cockpit display for distributed air-ground operations. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Oklahoma City, OK.
6. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Mcshkahi (Eds.). Human Mental Workload. (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
7. Joint Planning and Development Office. (2007). Concept of operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System, Version 2.0. Washington, DC: Author.
8. Lee, P. U. (2005). A non-linear relationship between controller workload and traffic count. Human Factors and Ergonomie Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, Human Performance Modeling, 5, 1 129-1133.
9. Ligda, S. V., Johnson. N., Lachter, J., & Johnson, W. W. (2009). Pilot confidence with ATC automation using cockpit situation display tools in a distributed traffic management environment. 13th Annual International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, San Diego, CA.
10. Prevot, T., Homola , J., Mercer, J., Mainini, M., & Cabrall, C. (2009). Initial evaluation of air/ground operations with ground-based automated separation assurance. Proceedings of the 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar. Napa, CA.
11. Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2008). Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors, 3, 511-520. (Pubitemid 352029812)
12. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wiekens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 3, 286-297.
13. Stein, E. S. (1985). Air traffic controller workload: An examination of workload probe. Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
14. nd ed.). New York: Harper.