The relationship between subjective and objective usability metrics for home healthcare devices

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 1001-1005

  Gao, Meiyuzi ^a   Kortum, Philip ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; DIAGNOSIS; EFFICIENCY; ERGONOMICS; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; OXIMETERS;

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; HEALTH-CARE SYSTEM; OBJECTIVE METRICS; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS; SUBJECTIVE METRIC; SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE (SUS); USABILITY METRICS;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 84981719220     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591286     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.
2. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. & Miller, J. A. (2008). The System Usability Scale (SUS): An Empirical Evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.
3. Caffrey, C., Sengupta, M., Moss, A., Harris-Kojetin, L., & Valverde, R. (2011). Home healthcare and discharged hospice care patients: United States, 2000 and 2007. National health statistics reports, (38), 1-27.
4. ™ Diabetes Phone: A usability study. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 9(2), 158-164.
5. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. (2010). Older Americans 2010: Key indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
6. ISO (1998). 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). The International Organization for Standardization.
7. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M. & Donaldson, M. S. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press, :Washington, DC
8. Kortum, P. and Bangor, A. (2013). Usability Ratings for Everyday Products Measured With the System Usability Scale (SUS). International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 29, 1-10.
9. Kortum, P., Hebl, M., & Oswald, F. L. (2014, September). Applying Usability Measures to Assess Textbooks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1346-1350). SAGE Publications.
10. Kortum, P., & Peres, S. C. (2014). The Relationship between System Effectiveness and Subjective Usability Scores Using The System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(7), 575-584.
11. Lewis, J. R. (1991). Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 23(1), 78-81.
12. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57-78.
13. National Association for Home Care & Hospice. (2010). Basic statistics about home care. Washington, DC: National Association for Home Care & Hospice, 1-14.
14. Nithyanand, R., Saxena, N., Tsudik, G., & Uzun, E. (2010, September). Groupthink: usability of secure group association for wireless devices. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 331-340). ACM.
15. Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 66-75.
16. Surabattula, D., Harvey, C. M., Aghazadeh, F., Rood, J., & Darisipudi, A. (2009). Usability of home cholesterol test kits and how their results impact patients' decisions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(1), 167-173.
17. Sauro, J., & Kindlund, E. (2005, April). A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 401-409). ACM.
18. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2009, April). Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: evidence for the construct of usability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1609-1618). ACM.