Threshold for diagnosing hypertension by automated office blood pressure using randomsample population data

Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 2180-2186

  Wohlfahrt, Peter ^a,b,c   Cífková, Renata ^a,b   Movsisyan, Narine ^a   Kunzová, Šárka ^a   Lešovský, Jiří ^a   Homolka, Martin ^a   Soška, Vladimír ^a,d   Bauerová, Hana ^a   Lopez Jimenez, Francisco ^e   Sochor, Ondřej ^a,e  

^a ST ANNE S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^d MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated office blood pressure measurement; Blood pressure; Masked hypertension; Mercury sphygmomanometer; White coat hypertension

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; CREATININE; MERCURY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; DIASTOLE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASKED HYPERTENSION; MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER; MIDDLE AGED; OFFICE AUTOMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPHYGMOMANOMETRY; SYSTOLE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION; ALGORITHM; BLOOD PRESSURE; DEVICES; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUE; SPHYGMOMANOMETER;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MASKED HYPERTENSION; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFERENCE VALUES; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS; WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION;

EID: 84981507293     PISSN: 02636352     EISSN: 14735598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001076     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013; 31:1281-1357.
2. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360:1903-1913.
3. Britton KA, Gaziano JM, Djousse L. Normal systolic blood pressure and risk of heart failure in US male physicians. Eur J Heart Fail 2009; 11:1129-1134.
4. Kalaitzidis RG, Bakris GL. Prehypertension: is it relevant for nephrologists? Kidney Int 2010; 77:194-200.
5. Conen D, Bamberg F. Noninvasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2008; 26:1290-1299.
6. Boggia J, Li Y, Thijs L, Hansen TW, Kikuya M, Bjorklund-Bodegard K, et al. Prognostic accuracy of day versus night ambulatory blood pressure: a cohort study. Lancet 2007; 370:1219-1229.
7. Fagard RH, Celis H, Thijs L, Staessen JA, Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, et al. Daytime and nighttime blood pressure as predictors of death and cause-specific cardiovascular events in hypertension. Hypertension 2008; 51:55-61.
8. Jaques H. NICE guideline on hypertension. Eur Heart J 2013; 34:406-408.
9. Myers MG. The great myth of office blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2012; 30:1894-1898.
10. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Godwin M. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2014; 60:127-132.
11. Cifkova R, Skodova Z, Bruthans J, Adamkova V, Jozifova M, Galovcova M, et al. Longitudinal trends in major cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population between 1985 and 2007/8. Czech MONICA and Czech post-MONICA. Atherosclerosis 2010; 211:676-681.
12. Cifkova R, Skodova Z, Bruthans J, Holub J, Adamkova V, Jozifova M, et al. Longitudinal trends in cardiovascular mortality and blood pressure levels, prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in theCzech population from 1985 to 2007/2008. J Hypertens 2010; 28:2196-2203.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
14. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution. Hypertension 2010; 55:195-200.
15. Cloutier L, Daskalopoulou SS, Padwal RS, Lamarre-Cliche M, Bolli P, McLean D, et al. A New Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Hypertension in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2015; 31:620-630.
16. Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2005; 5:18.
17. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens 2009; 27:280-286.
18. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Grant FC, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 342:d286.
19. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Paterson JM, Dolovich L, Tu K. Thresholds for diagnosing hypertension based on automated office blood pressure measurements and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension 2015; 66:489-495.
20. O'Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al. European Society of Hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 2013; 31:1731-1768.
21. Mancia G, Sega R, Bravi C, Vito GD, Valagussa F, Cesana G, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure normality: results from the PAMELA study. J Hypertens 1995; 13:1377-1390.
22. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Porcellati C. White-coat hypertension. Lancet 1996; 348:1444-1445; author reply 5-6.
23. Banegas JR, de la Sierra A, Segura J, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz J, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, et al. Control of hypertension in coronary heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2009; 134:245-247.
24. Verberk WJ, Kessels AG, de Leeuw PW. Prevalence, causes, and consequences of masked hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21:969-975.
25. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Fam Pract 2012; 29:376-382.
26. Schillaci G, Bilo G, Pucci G, Laurent S, Macquin-Mavier I, Boutouyrie P, et al. Relationship between short-term blood pressure variability and large-artery stiffness in human hypertension: findings from 2 large databases. Hypertension 2012; 60:369-377.
27. Wen SW, Kramer MS, Hoey J, Hanley JA, Usher RH. Terminal digit preference, random error, and bias in routine clinical measurement of blood pressure. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46:1187-1193.
28. de Lusignan S, Belsey J, Hague N, Dzregah B. End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18:261-265.
29. Wingfield D, Cooke J, Thijs L, Staessen JA, Fletcher AE, Fagard R, et al. Terminal digit preference and single-number preference in the Syst-Eur trial: influence of quality control. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:169-177.
30. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Grant FC, et al. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ 2011;342.
31. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit 2009; 14:108-111.
32. Armstrong D, Matangi M, Brouillard D, Myers MG. Automated office blood pressure-being alone and not location is what matters most. Blood Press Monit 2015; 20:204-208.
33. Thomsen M, Nordestgaard BG. Myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease in overweight and obesity with and without metabolic syndrome. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:15-22.
34. Firmann M, Mayor V, Vidal PM, Bochud M, Pecoud A, Hayoz D, et al. The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2008; 8:6.
35. Hubacek JA, Pikhart H, Peasey A, Kubinova R, Bobak M. FTO variant, energy intake, physical activity and basal metabolic rate in Caucasians. The HAPIEE study. Physiol Res 2011; 60:175-183.