Variation in ruminal in situ degradation of crude protein and starch from maize grains compared to in vitro gas production kinetics and physical and chemical characteristics

Archives of Animal Nutrition

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 333-349

  Seifried, Natascha ^a   Steingaß, Herbert ^a   Schipprack, Wolfgang ^a   Rodehutscord, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gas production; genotypic variation; in vitro production; maize; prediction; rumen fermentation

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE DIET; GAS; PROTEIN INTAKE;

ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; CHEMISTRY; DIET; FOOD GRAIN; GAS; GENETICS; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PROTEIN INTAKE; RUMEN; STOMACH JUICE; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; DIET; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIETARY PROTEINS; EDIBLE GRAIN; GASES; GASTROINTESTINAL CONTENTS; RUMEN; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84981244697     PISSN: 1745039X     EISSN: 14772817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1745039X.2016.1215028     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. A.Arieli, I.Bruckental, O.Kedar, D.Sklan 1995. In sacco disappearance of starch nitrogen and fat in processed grains. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 51:287–295.
2. Boehringer Mannheim. 1994. D-Glucose. In:Methoden der enzymatischen BioAnalytik und Lebensmittelanalytik. Mannheim:Boehringer Mannheim; p. 52–54.
3. E.S.Buckler, B.S.Gaut, M.D.McMullen. 2006. Molecular and functional diversity of maize. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 9:172–176.
4. Bundessortenamt. 2011. Beschreibende Sortenliste:Getreide, Mais, Öl- und Faserpflanzen, Leguminosen, Rüben, Zwischenfrüchte. Hannover:Bundessortenamt.
5. J.W.Cone, A.H.Van Gelder, H.Bachmann, V.A.Hindle. 2002. Comparison of organic matter degradation in several feedstuffs in the rumen as determined with the nylon bag and gas production techniques. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 96:55–67.
6. J.W.Cone, A.H.Van Gelder, I.Soliman, H.De Visser, A.Van Vuuren. 1999. Different techniques to study rumen fermentation characteristics of maturing grass and grass silage. J Dairy Sci. 82:957–966.
7. J.W.Cone, A.H.Van Gelder, H.Valk. 1998. Prediction of nylon bag degradation characteristics of grass samples with the gas production technique. J Sci Food Agric. 77:421–426.
8. C.E.S.Correa, R.D.Shaver, M.N.Pereira, J.G.Lauer, K.Kohn. 2002. Relationship between corn vitreousness and ruminal in situ starch degradability. J Dairy Sci. 85:3008–3012.
9. R.G.Dado. 1999. Nutritional benefits of speciality corn grain hybrids in dairy diets. J Anim Sci. 77:197–207.
10. M.Dombrink-Kurtzman. 1994. Examination of opaque mutants of maize by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and scanning electron microscopy. J Cereal Sci. 19:57–64.
11. GraphPad Prism version 5.00. 2007. San Diego (CA):GraphPad Software Inc.
12. P.Huhtanen, J.Sveinbjörnsson. 2006. Evaluation of methods for estimating starch digestibility and digestion kinetics in ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 130:95–113.
13. [ISTA] International Seed Testing Association. 2013. International rules for seed testing:weight determination. Bassersdorf:ISTA.
14. J.Kopčeková, Z.Čerešňáková, M.Šimko, P.Fľak, Z.Mlyneková. 2008. Effect of physical processing of cereals on rumen crude protein degradability. Slovak J Anim Sci. 41:160–165.
15. U.Krishnamoorthy, H.Soller, H.Steingass, K.H.Menke. 1991. A comparative study on rumen fermentation of energy supplements in vitro. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 65:28–35.
16. E.S.Kristensen, P.Moller, T.Hvelplund. 1982. Estimation of the effective protein degradability in the rumen of cows using the nylon bag technique combined with the outflow rate. Acta Agric Scand. 32:123–127.
17. J.Landry, T.Moureaux. 1980. Distribution and amino acid composition of protein groups located in different histological parts of maize grain. J Agric Food Chem. 28:1186–1191.
18. C.Lanzas, D.G.Fox, A.N.Pell. 2007. Digestion kinetics of dried cereal grains. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 136:265–280.
19. J.Lawton, C.Wilson. 2003. Proteins of the kernel. In:P.White, L.Johnson, editors. Corn:chemistry and technology. 2nd ed. St. Paul (MN):AACC; p. 313–358.
20. G.Licitra, T.M.Hernandez, P.J.Van Soest. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 57:347–358.
21. J.C.Lopes, R.D.Shaver, P.C.Hoffman, M.S.Akins, S.J.Bertics, H.Gencoglu, J.G.Coors. 2009. Type of corn endosperm influences nutrient digestibility in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 92:4541–4548.
22. J.Madsen, T.Hvelplund. 1994. Prediction of in situ protein degradability in the rumen. Results of a European ringtest. Livest Prod Sci. 39:201–212.
23. T.A.McAllister, R.C.Phillippe, L.M.Rode, K.J.Cheng. 1993. Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. J Anim Sci. 71:205–212.
24. K.H.Menke, H.Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 28:7–55.
25. J.E.Nocek, S.Tamminga. 1991. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3598–3629.
26. A.Offner, A.Bach, D.Sauvant. 2003. Quantitative review of in situ starch degradation in the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 106:81–93.
27. E.R.Ørskov, I.McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci. 92:499–503.
28. C.Philippeau, J.Landry, B.Michalet-Doreau. 2000. Influence of the protein distribution of maize endosperm on ruminal starch degradability. J Sci Food Agric. 80:404–408.
29. C.Philippeau, B.Michalet-Doreau. 1997. Influence of genotype and stage of maturity of maize on rate of ruminal starch degradation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 68:25–35.
30. B.M.O.Ramos, M.Champion, C.Poncet, I.Y.Mizubuti, P.Nozière. 2009. Effects of vitreousness and particle size of maize grain on ruminal and intestinal in sacco degradation of dry matter, starch and nitrogen. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 148:253–266.
31. J.Robutti, R.Hoseney, C.Wassom. 1974. Modified opaque-2 corn endosperms. ll. structure viewed with a scanning electron microscope. Cereal Chem. 51:173–180.
32. M.Rodehutscord, M.Kapocius, R.Timmler, A.Dieckmann. 2004. Linear regression approach to study amino acid digestibility in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 45:85–92.
33. M.Rodehutscord, C.Rückert, H.P.Maurer, H.Schenkel, W.Schipprack, K.E.Bach Knudsen, M.Schollenberger, M.Laux, M.Eklund, W.Siegert, R.Mosenthin. 2016. Variation in chemical composition and physical characteristics of cereal grains from different genotypes. Arch Anim Nutr. 70:87–107.
34. SAS. 2011. SAS user’s guide:statistics, version 9.3. Edition 2011. Cary (NC):SAS Institute Inc.
35. C.Sniffen, J.O’Connor, P.Van Soest, D.Fox, J.Russell. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J Anim Sci. 70:3562–3577.
36. M.N.Tahir, M.Hetta, M.Larsen, P.Lund, P.Huhtanen. 2013. In vitro estimations of the rate and extent of ruminal digestion of starch-rich feed fractions compared to in vivo data. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 179:36–45.
37. R.Tothi, P.Lund, M.R.Weisbjerg, T.Hvelplund. 2003. Effect of expander processing on fractional rate of maize and barley starch degradation in the rumen of dairy cows estimated using rumen evacuation and in situ techniques. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 104:71–94.
38. [VDLUFA] Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten. 1976. Handbuch der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs und Untersuchungsmethodik (VDLUFA-Methodenbuch), Bd. III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln mit 1.–8. Ergänzungslieferung (1983–2012), 3. Auflage. Darmstadt:VDLUFA-Verlag.
39. J.Verbič, J.M.A.Stekar, M.Resnik-Čepon. 1995. Rumen degradation characteristics and fibre composition of various morphological parts of different maize hybrids and possible consequences for breeding. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 54:133–148.