Capturing the conditions that introduce systematic variation in bike-sharing travel behavior using data mining techniques

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 71, Issue , 2016, Pages 231-248

  Bordagaray, Maria ^a   dell'Olio, Luigi ^a   Fonzone, Achille ^b   Ibeas, Ángel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bike sharing systems; Cycling; Data mining; Demand analysis; Smart card data; Trip chaining

Indexed keywords

BICYCLES; DECISION MAKING; SMART CARDS; TRAVEL TIME;

CARD TRANSACTIONS; CYCLING; DEMAND ANALYSIS; SERVICE RE-DESIGN; SHARING SYSTEMS; SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTIONS; SYSTEMATIC VARIATION; TRIP-CHAINING;

DATA MINING;

CYCLE TRANSPORT; DATA MINING; DEMAND ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84981187887     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.009     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Akar, G., Clifton, K.J., Influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on decision to bike. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, 2010.
2. Alonso, B., Bus Stop Location Model Considering the Operation and Incidents on the Network. (Ph.D. thesis), 2010, University of Cantabria.
3. Bordagaray, M., Dell'Olio, L., Ibeas, Á., Barreda, R., Alonso, B., Modelling the service quality of public bicycle schemes considering user heterogeneity. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9:8 (2015), 580–591.
4. Bordagaray, M., Fonzone, A., Dell'Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Considerations about the analysis of ITS data of bicycle sharing systems. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 162 (2014), 340–349.
5. Borgnat, P., Abry, P., Shared bicycles in a city: a signal processing and data analysis perspective. Adv. Complex Syst. 14:3 (2011), 415–438.
6. Cortés, C.E., Gibson, J., Gschwender, A., Munizaga, M., Zúñiga, M., Commercial bus speed diagnosis based on GPS-monitored data. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 19:4 (2011), 695–707.
7. Dell'Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Bordagaray, M., Ortúzar, J.D.D., Modeling the effects of pro bicycle infrastructure and policies toward sustainable urban mobility. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 140:2 (2011), 1–8.
8. Dell'Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Moura, J.L., Implementing bike-sharing systems. Proc. ICE Munic. Eng. 164:2 (2011), 89–101.
9. DeMaio, P., Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future. J. Public Transp. 12:4 (2009), 41–56.
10. Dill, J., Bicycling for transportation and health: the role of infrastructure. J. Public Health Policy 30 (2009), S95–S110.
11. Dill, J., Carr, T., Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828 (2003), 116–123, 10.3141/1828-14.
12. Dill, J., Gliebe, J., 2008. Understanding and measuring bicycling behavior: a focus on travel time and route choice. Portland, OR.
13. Efthymiou, D., Antoniou, C., Waddell, P., Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers. Transp. Policy 29 (2013), 64–73.
14. Faghih-Imani, A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A.M., Rabbat, M., Haq, U., How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. J. Transp. Geogr. 41 (2014), 306–314.
15. Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., Bike share: a synthesis of the literature. Transp. Rev. 33:2 (2013), 148–165.
16. Froehlich, J., Neumann, J., Oliver, N., 2008. Measuring the pulse of the city through shared bicycle programs. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Urban, Community, and Social Applications of Networked Sensing Systems, UrbanSense08.
17. García-Palomares, J.C., Gutiérrez, J., Latorre, M., Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: a GIS approach. Appl. Geogr. 35:1–2 (2012), 235–246.
18. González, F., Melo-Riquelme, C., Grange, L.De., A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system. Transportation, 2015, 10.1007/s11116-015-9581-6.
19. Gordon, J.B., Intermodal Passenger Flows on London’ s Public Transport Network. 2012, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
20. Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Maat, K., Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 30:1 (2010), 59–96.
21. Jäppinen, S., Toivonen, T., Salonen, M., Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: an open data approach. Appl. Geogr. 43 (2013), 13–24.
22. Jensen, P., Rouquier, J.-B., Ovtracht, N., Robardet, C., Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycle use in Lyon. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 15:8 (2010), 522–524.
23. Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., Banchs, R., Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 6:4 (2010), 455–466.
24. Lathia, N., Ahmed, S., Capra, L., Measuring the impact of opening the London shared bicycle scheme to casual users. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 22 (2012), 88–102.
25. Maldonado-Hinarejos, R., Sivakumar, A., Polak, J.W., Exploring the role of individual attitudes and perceptions in predicting the demand for cycling: a hybrid choice modelling approach. Transportation 41:6 (2014), 1287–1304.
26. Martens, K., The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 9:4 (2004), 281–294.
27. Martens, K., Promoting bike-and-ride: the Dutch experience. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 41:4 (2007), 326–338.
28. Midgley, P., 2011. Bicycle-sharing schemes: enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas. New York.
29. Munizaga, M.A., Palma, C., Estimation of a disaggregate multimodal public transport origin-destination matrix from passive smartcard data from Santiago, Chile. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 24 (2012), 9–18.
30. O'Brien, O., Cheshire, J., Batty, M., Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 34 (2014), 262–273.
31. Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp. Rev. 28:4 (2008), 495–528.
32. Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Integrating bicycling and public transport in North America. J. Public Transp. 12:3 (2009), 79–104.
33. Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S., Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50:Suppl. (2010), S106–S125.
34. Rietveld, P., Non-motorised modes in transport systems: a multimodal chain perspective for The Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part D 5:1 (2000), 31–36.
35. Rietveld, P., The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in The Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part D 5:1 (2000), 71–75.
36. Shaheen, S.A., Zhang, H., Martin, E., Guzman, S., China's Hangzhou public bicycle. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2247 (2011), 33–41.
37. Vogel, P., Greiser, T., Mattfeld, D.C., Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: exploring activity patterns. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 20 (2011), 514–523.
38. Wang, W., Attanucci, J.P., Wilson, N.H.M., Bus passenger origin-destination estimation and related analyzes using automated data collection systems. J. Public Transp. 14:4 (2011), 131–150.
39. Wilson, N.H.M., Zhao, J., Rahbee, A., The potential impact of automated data collection systems on urban public transport planning. Wilson, N.H.M., Nuzzolo, A., (eds.) Schedule-based Modeling of Transportation Networks, vol. 46, 2009, Springer, New York, 75–99.