Functional Status Score for the ICU: An International Clinimetric Analysis of Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Difference

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2016, Pages e1155-e1164

  Huang, Minxuan ^a   Chan, Kitty S ^b   Zanni, Jennifer M ^a   Parry, Selina M ^c   Neto, Saint Clair G B ^d,e,f   Neto, Jose A A ^e,f   Da Silva, Vinicius Z M ^g,h   Kho, Michelle E ^a,i   Needham, Dale M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE BRASÍLIA   (Brazil)

^e Hospital Santa Luzia   (Brazil)

^f D'Or Institute   (Brazil)

^g Medicine Graduation Course   (Brazil)

^h HOSPITAL DE BASE DO DISTRITO FEDERAL   (Brazil)

ⁱ MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Australia; Brazil; cross sectional studies; intensive care; reproducibility of results; United States

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; FUNCTIONAL STATUS ASSESSMENT; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARAMETERS; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84980378575     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001949     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Desai SV, Law TJ, Needham DM: Long-term complications of critical care. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:371-379
2. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1293-1304
3. Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, et al: Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: A two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med 2014; 42:849-859
4. Hough CL: Improving physical function during and after critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19:488-495
5. Fletcher SN, Kennedy DD, Ghosh IR, et al: Persistent neuromuscular and neurophysiologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of prolonged critical illness. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1012-1016
6. Tipping CJ, Young PJ, Romero L, et al: A systematic review of measurements of physical function in critically ill adults. Crit Care Resusc 2012; 14:302-311
7. Parry SM, Granger CL, Berney S, et al: Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: A systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:744-762
8. Connolly B: Describing and measuring recovery and rehabilitation after critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21:445-452
9. Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, et al: Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: An observational pilot project. J Crit Care 2010; 25:254-262
10. Thrush A, Rozek M, Dekerlegand JL: The clinical utility of the functional status score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU) at a long-term acute care hospital: A prospective cohort study. Phys Ther 2012; 92:1536-1545
11. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al: Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012; 21:651-657
12. Needham DM, Korupolu R, Zanni JM, et al: Early physical medicine and rehabilitation for patients with acute respiratory failure: A quality improvement project. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 536-542
13. Parry SM, Denehy L, Beach LJ, et al: Functional outcomes in ICU-what should we be using?-An observational study. Crit Care 2015; 19:127
14. Parry SM, Berney S, Warrillow S, et al: Functional electrical stimulation with cycling in the critically ill: A pilot case-matched control study. J Crit Care 2014; 29:695.e1-695.e7
15. Kho ME, Truong AD, Zanni JM, et al: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in mechanically ventilated patients: A randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial with blinded outcome assessment. J Crit Care 2015; 30:32-39
16. Kho ME, Truong AD, Brower RG, et al: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: Protocol and methodological implications for a randomized, sham-controlled, phase II trial. Phys Ther 2012; 92:1564-1579
17. Lawton MP, Brody EM: Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9:179-186
18. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al: Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185:914-919
19. Fan E, Ciesla ND, Truong AD, et al: Inter-rater reliability of manual muscle strength testing in ICU survivors and simulated patients. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:1038-1043
20. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, et al; Groupe de Réflexion et d'Etude des Neuromyopathies en Réanimation: Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: A prospective multicenter study. JAMA 2002; 288:2859-2867
21. Massy-Westropp NM, Gill TK, Taylor AW, et al: Hand grip strength: Age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4:127
22. Bohannon RW: Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:26-32
23. Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, et al: Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung 2014; 43:19-24
24. Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, et al: A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: Validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther 2013; 93:1636-1645
25. Piva S, Dora G, Minelli C, et al: The surgical optimal mobility score predicts mortality and length of stay in an Italian population of medical, surgical, and neurologic intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care 2015; 30:1251-1257
26. Schaller SJ, Stäuble CG, Suemasa M, et al: The German validation study of the surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score. J Crit Care 2016; 32:201-206
27. Knapp TR: Coefficient alpha: Conceptualizations and anomalies. Res Nurs Health 1991; 14:457-460
28. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF: Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27:S178-S189
29. Hough CL, Lieu BK, Caldwell ES: Manual muscle strength testing of critically ill patients: Feasibility and interobserver agreement. Crit Care 2011; 15:R43
30. Yost KJ, Eton DT: Combining distribution-and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience. Eval Health Prof 2005; 28:172-191
31. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, et al: Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61:102-109
32. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988
33. Bland JM, Altman DG: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997; 314:572
34. Chan KS, Friedman L, Dinglas VD et al: Evaluating physical outcomes in ARDS survivors: Validity, responsiveness & minimal important different of 4-meter gait speed test. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:859-868
35. Chan KS, Pfoh ER, Denehy L, et al: Construct validity and minimal important difference of 6-minute walk distance in survivors of acute respiratory failure. Chest 2015; 147:1316-1326
36. Pfoh E, Chan K, Dinglas V, et al: Cognitive screening among acute respiratory failure survivors: A cross-sectional evaluation of the mini mental state examination. Critical Care 2015;5:220
37. Nordon-Craft A, Schenkman M, Edbrooke L, et al: The physical function intensive care test: Implementation in survivors of critical illness. Phys Ther 2014; 94:1499-1507
38. Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, et al: The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): Validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy 2013; 99:33-41
39. Corner EJ, Hichens LV, Attrill KM, et al: The responsiveness of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: An observational study. Burns 2015; 41:241-247
40. Corner EJ, Soni N, Handy JM, et al: Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: An observational study of recovery from critical illness. Crit Care 2014; 18:R55
41. Perme C, Nawa RK, Winkelman C, et al: A tool to assess mobility status in critically ill patients: The Perme intensive care unit mobility score. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2014; 10:41-49
42. Nawa RK, Lettvin C, Winkelman C, et al: Initial interrater reliability for a novel measure of patient mobility in a cardiovascular intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2014; 29:475.e1-475.e5
43. Bissett B, Green M, Marzano V, et al: Reliability and utility of the acute care index of function in intensive care patients: An observational study. Heart Lung 2016; 45:10-14
44. Kasotakis G, Schmidt U, Perry D, et al: The surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score predicts mortality and length of stay. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1122-1128
45. de Vet H, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al: Measurement in Medicine-A Practical Guide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011
46. Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Babu AN, et al: A comparison of clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with chronic lung disease, asthma, or heart disease. Health Serv Res 2005; 40:577-591