Impact of National Institutes of Health Gastrointestinal PROMIS Measures in Clinical Practice: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 111, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1546-1556

  Almario, Christopher V ^a,b   Chey, William D ^c   Khanna, Dinesh ^c   Mosadeghi, Sasan ^a   Ahmed, Shahzad ^a   Afghani, Elham ^a   Whitman, Cynthia ^a   Fuller, Garth ^a   Reid, Mark ^a,b   Bolus, Roger ^a   Dennis, Buddy ^d   Encarnacion, Rey ^d   Martinez, Bibiana ^a,b   Soares, Jennifer ^a,b   Modi, Rushaba ^a   Agarwal, Nikhil ^a   Lee, Aaron ^a   Kubomoto, Scott ^a   Sharma, Gobind ^a   Bolus, Sally ^a   Spiegel, Brennan M R ^a,b   more..

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

9 ITEM SHARED DECISION MAKING QUESTIONNAIRE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSUMER ASSESSMENT OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND SYSTEMS QUESTIONNAIRE; DOCTORS INTERPERSONAL SKILLS QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; GOVERNMENT; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; AGED; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PATIENT PORTALS; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84980378517     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.305     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12: 559-68.
2. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 179-93.
3. Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care 2007; 45 (Suppl 1): S22-31.
4. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH et al. Role of health-related quality of life in palliative chemotherapy treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1056-62.
5. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH et al. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 3027-34.
6. Neumann M, Edelhauser F, Kreps GL et al. Can patient-provider interaction increase the effectiveness of medical treatment or even substitute it? - an exploration on why and how to study the specific effect of the provider. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 80: 307-14.
7. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 833-43.
8. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 115-23.
9. Lohr KN, Zebrack BJ. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 99-107.
10. Gilbert A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Davidson S et al. Use of patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms and health related quality of life in the clinic. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136: 429-39.
11. Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K et al. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1846-58.
12. Kroenke K, Monahan PO, Kean J. Pragmatic characteristics of patientreported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 1085-92.
13. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007; 45 (Suppl 1): S3-11.
14. Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, Roddey TS. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag? Health Serv Res 2005; 40 (Part 2): 1694-711.
15. Chakravarty EF, Bjorner JB, Fries JF. Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1426-31.
16. Spiegel BM, Hays RD, Bolus R et al. Development of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) gastrointestinal symptom scales. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1804-14.
17. Nagaraja V, Hays RD, Khanna PP et al. Construct validity of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)) gastrointestinal symptom scales in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66: 1725-30.
18. Spiegel BM. Patient-reported outcomes in gastroenterology: clinical and research applications. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19: 137-48.
19. Almario CV, Chey W, Kaung A et al. Computer-generated vs. physiciandocumented history of present illness (HPI): results of a blinded comparison. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 170-9.
20. Almario CV, Chey WD, Iriana S et al. Computer versus physician identifi- cation of gastrointestinal alarm features. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84: 1111-7.
21. Dyer N, Sorra JS, Smith SA et al. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS(R)) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey. Med Care 2012; 50 (Suppl): S28-34.
22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. CAHPS Database, 2016. Available at: https://www.cahpsdatabase.ahrq.gov/CAHPSIDB/Public/CG/ CG-About.aspx (last accessed 6 January 2016).
23. Greco M, Cavanagh M, Brownlea A et al. Validation studies of the Doctors' Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire. Educ Gen Pract 1999; 10: 256-64.
24. Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L et al. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 80: 94-9..
25. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155.
26. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in healthrelated quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582-92.
27. Wagner LI, Schink J, Bass M et al. Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer 2015; 121: 927-34.
28. Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM et al. Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 677-87.
29. Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A et al. Disparities in enrollment and use of an electronic patient portal. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 1112-6.
30. Roblin DW, Houston TK II, Allison JJ et al. Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 683-9.
31. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY et al. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 318-21.
32. Slavitt A, DeSalvo K. EHR Incentive Programs: Where We Go Next, 2016. Available at: https://blog.cms.gov/2016/01/19/ehr-incentive-programswhere- we-go-next/ (last accessed 5 February 2016).