Visual interference disrupts visual knowledge

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 92, Issue , 2017, Pages 281-292

  Edmiston, Pierce ^a   Lupyan, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Concepts; Representations; Visual knowledge; Visual long term memory; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING TEST; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84979785041     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albers, A.M., Kok, P., Toni, I., Dijkerman, H.C., de Lange, F.P., Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex. Current Biology 23:15 (2013), 1427–1431, 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.065.
2. Amsel, B.D., Urbach, T.P., Kutas, M., Empirically grounding grounded cognition: The case of color. NeuroImage 99C (2014), 149–157, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.025.
3. Anderson, B., There is no such thing as attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 2011, 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00246.
4. Barsalou, L.W., Simmons, W.K., Barbey, A.K., Wilson, C.D., Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:2 (2003), 84–91, 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3.
5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Retrieved from , 2014.
6. Boutonnet, B., Lupyan, G., Words jump-start vision: A label advantage in object recognition. The Journal of Neuroscience 32:25 (2015), 9329–9335.
7. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A.E., Rapp, B.C., Romani, C., The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 7:3 (1990), 161–189, 10.1080/02643299008253441.
8. Collins, A.M., Loftus, E.F., A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82:6 (1975), 407–428, 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407.
9. Cree, G.S., McRae, K., Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132:2 (2003), 163–201, 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163.
10. Farah, M.J., The neural basis of mental imagery. Trends in Neurosciences 12:10 (1989), 395–399, 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90079-9.
11. Firestone, C., Scholl, B.J., Enhanced visual awareness for morality and pajamas? Perception vs. memory in “top-down” effects. Cognition, 2015, 409–416.
12. Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Shapes, scents and sounds: Quantifying the full multi-sensory basis of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia 51:1 (2013), 14–25, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.009.
13. Kosslyn, S.M., Ganis, G., Thompson, W.L., Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:9 (2001), 635–642, 10.1038/35090055.
14. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B., lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Retrieved from , 2014.
15. Lupyan, G., Spivey, M.J., Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72:8 (2010), 2236–2253, 10.3758/APP.72.8.2236.
16. Lupyan, G., Thompson-Schill, S.L., The evocative power of words: Activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141:1 (2012), 170–186, 10.1037/a0024904.
17. Lupyan, G., Ward, E.J., Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:35 (2013), 14196–14201, 10.1073/pnas.1303312110.
18. Mahon, B.Z., Caramazza, A., A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris 102:1–3 (2008), 59–70, 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004.
19. Martin, A., The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58 (2007), 25–45, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143.
20. McRae, K., Cree, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., McNorgan, C., Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods 37:4 (2005), 547–559, 10.3758/BF03192726.
21. Meteyard, L., Zokaei, N., Bahrami, B., Vigliocco, G., Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words. Current Biology 18:17 (2008), R732–R733, 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.016.
22. Naselaris, T., Olman, C.A., Stansbury, D.E., Ugurbil, K., Gallant, J.L., A voxel-wise encoding model for early visual areas decodes mental images of remembered scenes. NeuroImage 105 (2015), 215–228, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.018.
23. Papeo, L., Pascual-Leone, A., Caramazza, A., Disrupting the brain to validate hypotheses on the neurobiology of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 2013, 148, 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00148.
24. Pearson, J., Clifford, C.W.G., Tong, F., The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology 18:13 (2008), 982–986, 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.048.
25. Pinker, S., The language instinct. 1994, W. Morrow and Co., New York.
26. Pobric, G., Jefferies, E., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: Mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:50 (2007), 20137–20141, 10.1073/pnas.0707383104.
27. Pobric, G., Jefferies, E., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Current Biology 20:10 (2010), 964–968, 10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.070.
28. Price, C.J., Devlin, J.T., The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage 19:3 (2003), 473–481, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00084-3.
29. Pulvermüller, F., Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6:7 (2005), 576–582, 10.1038/nrn1706.
30. Pylyshyn, Z.W., Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. 1986, MIT Press, Cambridge.
31. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2014, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria Retrieved from .
32. Rossion, B., Pourtois, G., Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 33:2 (2004), 217–236.
33. Simmons, W.K., Ramjee, V., Beauchamp, M.S., McRae, K., Martin, A., Barsalou, L.W., A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color. Neuropsychologia 45:12 (2007), 2802–2810, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.002.
34. Tulving, E., Episodic and semantic memory. Organization of memory, 1972, Academic Press, Oxford, England pp. xiii, 423.
35. Vallet, G., Brunel, L., Versace, R., The perceptual nature of the cross-modal priming effect: Arguments in favor of a sensory-based conception of memory. Experimental Psychology 57:5 (2010), 376–382, 10.1027/1618-3169/a000045.
36. Vermeulen, N., Corneille, O., Niedenthal, P.M., Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs. Cognition 109:2 (2008), 287–294, 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.004.
37. Yee, E., Chrysikou, E.G., Hoffman, E., Thompson-Schill, S.L., Manual experience shapes object representations. Psychological Science 24:6 (2013), 909–919, 10.1177/0956797612464658.