Effects of neurofeedback and computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation on relative brain wave ratios and activities of daily living of stroke patients: A randomized control trial

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 2154-2158

  Cho, Hwi Young ^a   Kim, Ki Tae ^b   Jung, Jin Hwa ^b  

^a Gachon University   (South Korea)

^b Semyung University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Brain wave; Computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CACR); Neurofeedback (NFB)

Indexed keywords

BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; NEUROFEEDBACK; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION; STROKE PATIENT;

EID: 84979766892     PISSN: 09155287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.2154     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF: Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke, 2006, 37: 1237–1242.
2. Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Koh CL, et al.: A systematic review of cognitive interventions to improve functional ability in people who have cognitive impairment following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2010, 17: 99–107.
3. Kado RF, Ouellette T, Summers T: Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation treatment and outcomes. J Cogn Rehabil, 2002, 20: 20–27.
4. Cederfeldt M, Gosman-Hedström G, Sävborg M, et al.: Influence of cognition on personal activities of daily living (P-ADL) in the acute phase: the Gothenburg Cognitive Stroke Study in Elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2009, 49: 118–122.
5. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD: Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav, 2004, 36: 212–224.
6. Chen SH, Thomas JD, Glueckauf RL, et al.: The effectiveness of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 1997, 11: 197–209.
7. Gontkovsky ST, McDonald NB, Clark PG, et al.: Current directions in computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation, 2002, 17: 195–199.
8. Tornatore JB, Hill E, Laboff JA, et al.: Self-administered screening for mild cognitive impairment: initial validation of a computerized test battery. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2005, 17: 98–105.
9. Serruya MD, Kahana MJ: Techniques and devices to restore cognition. Behav Brain Res, 2008, 192: 149–165.
10. Sokhadze TM, Cannon RL, Trudeau DL: EEG biofeedback as a treatment for substance use disorders: review, rating of efficacy, and recommendations for further research. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2008, 33: 1–28.
11. Cho HY, Kim K, Lee B, et al.: The effect of neurofeedback on a brain wave and visual perception in stroke: a randomized control trial. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 673–676.
12. Thornton KE, Carmody DP: Electroencephalogram biofeedback for reading disability and traumatic brain injury. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am, 2005, 14: 137–162, vii vii.
13. Fidopiastis CM, Rizzo AA, Rolland JP: User-centered virtual environment design for virtual rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2010, 7: 11.
14. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, et al.: Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1990, 71: 870–875.
15. Walker JE, Norman CA, Weber RK: Impact of qEEG-guided coherence training for patients with a mild closed head injury. J Neurother, 2002, 6: 31–43.
16. Praamstra P, Boutsen L, Humphreys GW: Frontoparietal control of spatial attention and motor intention in human EEG. J Neurophysiol, 2005, 94: 764–774.
17. Kim YH, Yoo WK, Ko MH, et al.: Plasticity of the attentional network after brain injury and cognitive rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009, 23: 468–477.