The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: A bibliometric analysis

Results in Physics

Volumn 139, Issue , 2016, Pages 149-156

  Kim, Hye Jeong ^a   Yoon, Dae Young ^a   Kim, Eun Soo ^b   Lee, Kwanseop ^b   Bae, Jong Seok ^a   Lee, Ju Hun ^a  

^a Hallym University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Citation; Citation classics; Neuroimaging

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PUBLICATION; UTILIZATION;

BIBLIOMETRICS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROIMAGING; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84979633755     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22113797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.029     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., Wang, L., Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed. Digit. Libr., 3, 2006, 7.
2. Baltussen, A., Kindler, C.H., Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth. Analg. 98 (2004), 443–451.
3. Brandt, J.S., Downing, A.C., Howard, D.L., Kofinas, J.D., Chasen, S.T., Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 203 (2010), 355e1–355e7.
4. Braun, T., The reliability of total citation rankings. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003), 45–46.
5. Brinjikji, W., Klunder, A., Kallmes, D.F., The 100 most-cited articles in the imaging literature. Radiology 269 (2013), 272–276.
6. Callaham, M., Wears, R.L., Weber, E., Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 287 (2002), 2847–2850.
7. Campbell, F.M., National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 78 (1990), 376–382.
8. Chew, F.S., AJR: the 50 most frequently cited papers in the past 50 years. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 150 (1988), 227–233.
9. Crockett, M.T., Browne, R.F., MacMahon, P.J., Lawler, L., 100 classic papers of interventional radiology: a citation analysis. World J. Radiol. 7 (2015), 79–86.
10. Dolan, R.S., Hanna, T.N., Warraich, G.J., Johnson, J.O., Khosa, F., The top 100 articles in the radiology of trauma: a bibliometric analysis. Emerg. Radiol. 22 (2015), 667–675.
11. Dumont, J.E., The bias of citations. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14 (1989), 327–328.
12. Eyre-Walker, A., Stoletzki, N., The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol., 11, 2013, e1001675.
13. Garfield, E., Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178 (1972), 471–479.
14. Garfield, E., 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 257 (1987), 52–59.
15. Hoeffner, E.G., Mukherji, S.K., Srinivasan, A., Quint, D.J., Neuroradiology back to the future: brain imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33 (2012), 5–11.
16. Kelly, J.C., Glynn, R.W., O'Briain, D.E., Felle, P., McCabe, J.P., The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.) 92 (2010), 1338–1343.
17. Kulkarni, A.V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., Busse, J.W., Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 302 (2009), 1092–1096.
18. Marx, W.S.H., Wanitschek, M., Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics 52 (2001), 59–82.
19. Moed, H.F., New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 57 (2009), 13–18.
20. Pagni, M., Khan, N.R., Cohen, H.L., Choudhri, A.F., Highly cited works in radiology: the top 100 cited articles in radiologic journals. Acad. Radiol. 21 (2014), 1056–1066.
21. Paladugu, R., Schein, M., Gardezi, S., Wise, L., One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J. Surg. 26 (2002), 1099–1105.
22. Pepe, A., Kurtz, M.J., A measure of total research impact independent of time and discipline. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e46428.
23. Ponce, F.A., Lozano, A.M., Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals. J. Neurosurg. 112 (2010), 223–232.
24. Shadgan, B., Roig, M., Hajghanbari, B., Reid, W.D., Top-cited articles in rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91 (2010), 806–815.
25. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., Joliot, M., Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15 (2002), 273–289.
26. Yoon, D.Y., Yun, E.J., Ku, Y.J., Baek, S., Lim, K.J., Seo, Y.L., Yie, M., Citation classics in radiology journals: the 100 top-cited articles, 1945–2012. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 201 (2013), 471–481.
27. Yun, E.J., Yoon, D.Y., Kim, B.Y., Kim, Y.J., Baek, S., Lim, K.J., Seo, Y.L., Where do radiologists publish their work? A comparative analysis of publications by radiologists in nonradiology journals in 2000 and 2010. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 200 (2013), W560–W565.