Self-Defence in Criminal Law

Self-Defence in Criminal Law

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-376

  Sangero, Boaz ^a,b  

^a Academic College of Law   (Israel)

^b Israeli Bar   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979618145     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (204)

1. BIBLIOGRAPHY
2. AIYAR, KJ and ANAD, RL, Law of Private Defence, 2nd edn rev by CU Menon (Allahabad, 1964).
3. ALEXANDER, LA, ‘Self-Defense and the Killing of Non-Combatants: A Reply to Fullinwider’ (1976) 5 Philosophy and Public Affairs 408.
4. ALEXANDER, LA, ‘Justification and Innocent Aggressors’ (1987) 33 Wayne Law Review 1177.
5. ALEXANDER, LA, ‘Self-Defense, Punishment and Proportionality’ (1991) 10 Law and Philosophy 323.
6. American Jurisprudence, vol 6 and Cumulative Supplement, 2nd edn (Rochester, NY; San Francisco, CA, 1963 and 1998).
7. American Jurisprudence, vol 21, 2nd edn (Rochester, NY; San Francisco, CA, 1998).
8. American Jurisprudence, vol 40, 2nd edn (Rochester, NY; San Francisco, CA, 1999).
9. ARCHBOLD, JF, Pleading, Evidence and Practice in Criminal Cases, 42nd edn by S Mitchell, PJ Richardson and JH Buzzard. (London, 1985–88); 5th Cumulative Supplement (London, 1987).
10. ASHWORTH, ANDREW, Principles of Criminal Law, 4th edn (NewYork, 2003).
11. ASHWORTH, AJ, ‘Self-Defense and the Right to Life’ (1975) 32 CLJ 282.
12. ASHWORTH, AJ, (editorial) ‘Counter-Revolution in the Law of Self-Defence’ (1988) Crim LR 1.
13. ASHWORTH, AJ, ‘Case and Comment: Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus’ (1998) Crim LR 823.
14. BACON, FRANCIS, Essays: of Wisdom for a Man’s Self (1625).
15. BAUM, FS and BAUM JB, Law of Self-Defense (New York, 1970).
16. BEALE, JH, ‘Homicide in Self-Defense’ (1903) 3 Columbia Law Review 526.
17. BEALE, JH, ‘Retreat from a Murderous Assault’ (1903) 16 Harvard Law Review 567.
18. BEALE, JH, ‘Justification for Injury’ (1928) 41 Harvard Law Review 553.
19. BEDAU, HA, ‘The Right to Life’ (1968) 52 Monist 550.
20. BEIN, D, ‘The Duty to Retreat in “Self Defence” ’ (1967) 23 Hapraklit 221 (Hebrew).
21. BEIN, D, ‘The Attitude of the Criminal Law towards Self-Help’ (1968) 24 Hapraklit 322 (Hebrew).
22. BEIN, D, ‘The Defence of Immunity of the Dwelling in our Criminal Law’ (1969) 1 Mishpatim 519 (Hebrew).
23. BEN-PORAT, Miriam, ‘The Good Samaritan’ (1980) 7 Tel Aviv University Law Review 269 (Hebrew).
24. BEN-PORAT, Miriam, ‘The Constraint and Necessity Defence’ (1989) 14 Tel Aviv University Law Review 211 (Hebrew).
25. BEN-ZIMRA, AZ, ‘Killing out of “Necessity” in Hebrew Law and in Israeli Law’ (1976–77) C–D Hebrew Law Annual 117 (Hebrew).
26. BENTHAM, J, Works of J. Bentham, ed by Bowring (London, 1943).
27. BERNSMANN, K, ‘Private Self-Defence and Necessity in German Penal Law and in the Penal Code Proposal: Some Remarks’ (1996) 30 Israel Law Review 171.
28. BLACKMAN, J, ‘Potential Uses for Expert Testimony: Ideas towards the Representation of Battered Women who Killed’ (1986–89) 9–11 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 227.
29. BLACKSTONE, W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, reprint of 1st edn with supplement (London, 1966).
30. BOCHNAK, E (ed) Women’s Self-Defense Cases: Theory and Practice (Charlottesville, VA, 1980).
31. BROWN, B, ‘Self-Defence in Homicide: From Strict Liability to Complete Exculpation’ (1958) Crim LR 583.
32. CARD, R, CROSS, R and JONES, PA, Criminal Law, 14th edn (London, 1998).
33. CHRISTOPHER, RL, ‘Unknowing Justification and the Logical Necessity of the Dadson Principle in Self-Defence’ (1995) 15 OJLS 229.
34. CLARKSON, CMV, ‘Necessary Action: A New Defence’ (2004) Crim LR 13.
35. Commission of Inquiry into the Methods of Investigation of the General Security Service Regarding Hostile Terrorist Activity (Chairman Justice Landau, 1987) (Hebrew). Parts of the report are translated into English at (1989) 23 Israel Law Review. 146–88.
36. COOPER, RJ, ‘Court of Appeal: Self-Defence: Need to Demonstrate Unwillingness to Fight (R. v. Bird)’ (1985) 49 Journal of Criminal Law 327.
37. Corpus Juris Secundum, vol 22 (St Paul, MN, 1989); Cumulative Annual Pocket Part (1999).
38. COWLEY, D, ‘Privy Council—Mistake and Self-Defence—The Correct Test—Beckford v. the Queen’(1988) 52 Journal of Criminal Law 57.
39. COWLEY, D, ‘Criminal Damage Act 1971: Lawful Excuse (R. v. Hill, R v. Hall)’ (1989) 53 Journal of Criminal Law 176.
40. DAN-COHEN, M, ‘Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law’ (1984) 97 Harvard Law Review 625.
41. DIAMOND, S, ‘Criminal Law: The Justification of Self-Defense’ (1987) Annual Survey of American Law 673
42. DRESSLER, JOSHUA, ‘New Thoughts about the Concept of Justification in the Criminal Law: A Critique of Fletcher’s Thinking and Rethinking’ (1984–85) 32 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 61.
43. DRESSLER, JOSHUA, Understanding Criminal Law, 2nd edn (New York, 1995).
44. DRESSLER, JOSHUA, ‘Battered Women Who Kill Their Sleeping Tormenters: Reflections on Maintaining Respect for Human Life while Killing Moral Monsters’ in S Shute and AP Simester (eds) Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part, Oxford, 2002) 259.
45. DYKAN, PALTIEL, Criminal Law, with Special Reference to the History of Jewish Law and to the Law of Israel (1957) Pt IV (Hebrew).
46. ELLIOT, DW, ‘Necessity, Duress and Self-Defence’ (1989) Crim LR 611.
47. ENKER, ARNOLD N, Duress and Necessity in the Criminal Law (1977) (Hebrew).
48. ENKER, ARNOLD N, ‘Mens Rea and Criminal Attempts’ (1977) American Bar Foundation Research Journal 845.
49. ENKER, ARNOLD N, ‘Three Opinions in Jewish Law Concerning the Theory of Self-Defence’ (1991) 2 Plilim 55 (Hebrew).
50. ENKER, ARNOLD N, ‘Duress, Self-Defense and Necessity in Israeli Law’ (1996) 30 Israel Law Review 188.
51. ENKER, ARNOLD and KANNAI, RUTH, ‘Self-Defence and Necessity after Amendment 37 to the Penal Code’ (1992) 3 Plilim 5 (Hebrew).
52. ESER, A, ‘Justification and Excuse’ (1976) 24 American Journal of Comparative Law 621.
53. ESER, A and FLETCHER, P (eds) Justification and Excuse (Freiburg, 1987).
54. FELLER, SZ, ‘Defence of “Necessity” and its Limitations’ (1971) 6 Israel Law Review 417.
55. FELLER, SZ, ‘The “Necessity” (Stricto Sensu) as a Situation Negating the Criminality of the Action’ (1972–73) 4 Mishpatim 5 (Hebrew).
56. FELLER, SZ, ‘Application of the “Foundations of Law Act” in Criminal Law’ in Essays in Honour of Justice Zussman (1984) 345 (Hebrew).
57. FELLER, SZ, Elements of Criminal Law (1984) (Hebrew).
58. FELLER, SZ, ‘ Concerning the Right of Self-Defence: Signs of Heresy in the Horowitz Rule (C.A. 298/88 Twito v. State of Israel)’ (1990) 15 LS 189 (Hebrew).
59. FINKELMAN, M, ‘Self-Defense and Defense of Others in Jewish Law: The Rodef Defense’ (1987) 33 Wayne Law Review 1257.
60. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘Proportionality and the Psychotic Aggressor: A Vignette in Comparative Criminal Theory’ (1973) 8 Israel Law Review 367.
61. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr. Robinson’ (1975–76) 23 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 293.
62. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape?’ (1978–79) 26 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 1355.
63. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston and Toronto, 1978).
64. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘The Right to Life’ (1979) 13 Georgia Law Review 1371.
65. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘The Right and the Reasonable’ (1985) 98 Harvard Law Review 949. (This article was also published in the book by Eser and Fletcher, Justification and Excuse, vol 1 at 67).
66. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, A Crime of Self-Defense: Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial (New York, 1988).
67. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘Punishment and Self-Defense’ (1989) 8 Law and Philosophy 201.
68. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘The Psychotic Aggressor: A Generation Later’ (1993) 27 Israel Law Review 227.
69. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, ‘Self-Defense of Battered Women’ (1997) 6 Plilim 65 (Hebrew).
70. FLETCHER, GEORGE P, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (New York and Oxford, 1998).
71. FRIMER, D, ‘Defining the Right of Self-Defence’ (1983) 31 Or Hamizrach 325 (Hebrew).
72. FRIMER, D, ‘The Guiltless Aggressor’ (1986) 34 Or Hamizrach 94 (Hebrew).
73. FRIMER, D, ‘The Right of Self-Defense and Abortion’ in Nahum Rakover (ed) Maimonides as Codifier of Jewish Law (Jerusalem, 1987) 195.
74. GARDNER, JOHN, ‘Justifications and Reasons’ in AP Simester and ATH Smith (eds) Harm and Culpability (Oxford, 1996) 103.
75. GARNEAU, GS, ‘The Law Reform Commission of Canada and the Defence of Justification’ (1983–84) 26 Criminal Law Quarterly 121.
76. GEWIRTH, A, ‘Are There any Absolute Rights?’(1981) 31 Philosophical Quarterly. 1.
77. GILES, M, ‘Self-Defence and Mistake: A Way Forward’. (1990) 53 MLR 187.
78. GORDON, GH, The Criminal Law of Scotland, 2nd edn (Edinburgh, 1978).
79. GORR, M, ‘Private Defense’ (1990) 9 Law and Philosophy 241.
80. GREENAWALT, K, ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’ (1984) 84 Columbia Law Review 1897. (This article was also published in the book by Eser and Fletcher, Justification and Excuse, vol 1 at 263).
81. GROSS, EMANUEL, ‘Agent Provocateur as a Defence Claim in a Criminal Trial’ (1987) 37 Hapraklit 107 (Hebrew).
82. GUR-ARYE, MIRIAM, Actio Libera in Causa in Criminal Law (1984).
83. GUR-ARYE, MIRIAM, ‘Actio Libera in Causa and Private Defence’ (1985) 15 Mishpatim 145 (Hebrew).
84. GUR-ARYE, MIRIAM, ‘Should the Criminal Law Distinguish between Necessity as a Justification and Necessity as an Excuse?’ (1986) 102 LQR 71.
85. GUR-ARYE, MIRIAM, ‘Should a Criminal Code Distinguish between Justification and Excuse?’ (1992) 5 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 215.
86. HALL, J, General Principles of Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Indianapolis and New York, 1960).
87. HALL, J, ‘Comment on Justification and Excuse’ (1976) 24 American Journal of Comparative Law 638.
88. HALL, J, FORCE, R and GEORGE, BJ, Criminal Law: Cases and Readings, 4th edn (Charlottesville, VA, 1982).
89. Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th edn, reissue (London, 1990) vol 11; Cumulative Supplement (1999).
90. HARLOW, C, ‘Self-Defence: Public Right or Private Privilege’ (1974) Crim LR 528.
91. HART, HLA, Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford, 1968).
92. HEBERLING, PDW, ‘Justification: The Impact of the Model Penal Code on Statutory Reform’ (1975) 75 Columbia Law Review 914.
93. HERMANN, J, ‘Causing the Conditions of One’s Own Defense: The Multi-Faceted Approach of German Law’ (1986) Brigham Young University Law Review 747. (This article was also published in the book by Eser and Fletcher, Justification and Excuse, vol 2 at 745).
94. HOBBES, THOMAS, Leviathan (1651; reprinted London, 1985).
95. HOLMES, OW, The Common Law, ed by Howe (Cambridge, 1963)
96. HORDER, JEREMY, ‘Killing the Passive Abuser: A Theoretical Defence’ in S Shute and AP Simester Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford, 2002) 283.
97. HOWARD, C, Criminal Law, 4th edn (Sydney and Melbourne, 1982).
98. JESCHECK, HH, Lehrbuch des Strafrechts (Berlin, 1988).
99. KADISH, STANFORD H, ‘Respect for Life and Regard for Rights in the Criminal Law’ (1976) 64 California Law Review 871.
100. KADISH, STANFORD H, (ed) Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice (New York and London, 1983) vol 3.
101. KADISH, STANFORD H and SCHULHOFER, Stephen J, Criminal Law and Its Processes, 5th edn (London, 1989).
102. KADISH, STANFORD H and SCHULHOFER, Stephen J, Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials, 7th edn (Oxford, 2001).
103. KANT, IMMANUEL, Introduction to the Science of Right, trans Hastie (Edinburgh, 1887)
104. KANT, IMMANUEL, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Ethics. Kenny’s Outlines of Criminal Law, 19th edn by JWC Turner (Cambridge, 1966).
105. KITAI, RINAT, ‘Presuming Innocence’ (2002) 55 Okla. L. Rev. 257
106. KREMNITZER, MORDECHAI, ‘Proportionality and the Psychotic Aggressor: Another View’ (1983) 18 Israel Law Review 178.
107. KREMNITZER, MORDECHAI, On Some Characteristics of German Criminal Law’ in Essays in Honour of Justice Shimon Agranat (1986) (Hebrew).
108. KREMNITZER, MORDECHAI, ‘Interpretation in Criminal Law’ (1986) 21 Israel Law Review 358.
109. KREMNITZER, MORDECHAI, ‘The Landau Commission Report: Was the Security Service Subordinated to the Law, or the Law to the “Needs” of the Security Service?’ (1989) 23 Israel Law Review 216.
110. KREMNITZER, MORDECHAI, ‘Causing the Condition of Self-Defence’ (1998) 29 Mishpatim 445 (Hebrew).
111. LA FAVE, WR and Scott, AW, Substantive Criminal Law (St Paul, MN, 1986) vol 1.
112. LANHAM, D, ‘Death of a Qualified Defense?’ (1988) 104 LQR 239.
113. LEDERMAN, E, ‘Entrapment by a Public Official’ (1972) Criminology, Criminal Law and Police Quarterly 253 (Hebrew).
114. LEIGH, LH, ‘Manslaughter and the Limits of Self-Defence’ (1971) 34 MLR 685.
115. LEVERICK, F, ‘Is English Self-Defence Law Compatible with Article 2 of the ECHR?’ (2002) Crim. LR 347.
116. LEVERICK, F, ‘The Use of Force in Public or Private Defence and Article 2: A Reply to Professor Smith’ (2002) Crim LR 963.
117. LEVINE, S, ‘The Moral Permissibility of Killing a “Material Aggressor” in “Self-Defense”’ (1984) 45 Philosophical Studies 69.
118. LEVINSON, B, ‘Using Expert Testimony in the Grand Jury to Avoid a Homicide Indictment for a Battered Woman: Practical Considerations for Defense Counsel’(1986–89) 9–11 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 239.
119. LOCKE, J, The Second Treatise of Government.
120. MOENSSENS, ANDRE A, STARRS, JAMES E, HENDERSON, CAROL E, and INBAU, FRED E, Scientific Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases, 4th edn (New York, 1995).
121. MONTAGUE, P, ‘Self-Defense and Choosing between Lives’ (1981) 40 Philosophical Studies 207.
122. MONTAGUE, P, ‘Punishment and Societal Defense’ (1983) 2 Criminal Justice Ethics 30.
123. MONTAGUE, P, ‘The Morality of Self-Defense: A Reply to Wasserman’ (1989) 18 Philosophy and Public Affairs 81.
124. MOORE, MS, ‘Torture and the Balance of Evils’ (1989) 23 Israel Law Review 280.
125. NINO, CS, ‘Does Consent Override Proportionality?’ (1986) 15 Philosophy and Public Affairs 183.
126. NOURSE, VF, ‘Self-Defense and Subjectivity’ (2001) 68 University of Chicago Law Review 1235.
127. NOZICK, R, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York, 1974).
128. NOZICK, R, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, 1981).
129. O’BRIEN, NC, ‘Excessive Self-Defence: A Need for Legislation’ (1982–83) 25 Criminal Law Quarterly 441.
130. OMICHINSKI, NM, ‘Applying the Theories of Justifiable Homicide to Conflicts in the Doctrine of Self-Defense’ (1987) 33 Wayne Law Review 1447.
131. O’REGAN, RS, New Essays on the Australian Criminal Codes (Sydney, 1988).
132. PARISH, S, ‘Self Defence: The Wrong Direction?’ (1997) Crim LR 201.
133. PARUSH, ADI, ‘Law, Morality and the Good Samaritan’ (1976–77) 27 Iyun 295 (Hebrew).
134. PERKINS, RM, ‘Self-Defense Re-Examined’ (1954) 1 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 133.
135. PERKINS, RM and BOYCE, RN, Criminal Law, 3rd edn (Mineola, NY, 1982).
136. PRIMORAC, I, ‘On Capital Punishment’ (1982) 17 Israel Law Review 133.
137. RADBRUCH, GL, ‘Jurisprudence in the Criminal Law’ (1936) 18 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 212.
138. REVILLE, NJ, ‘Self-Defence: Courting Sober but Unreasonable Mistakes of Fact’ (1988) 52 Journal of Criminal Law 84.
139. ROBINSON, PAUL H, ‘A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability’ (1975) 23 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 266.
140. ROBINSON, PAUL H, ‘Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis’ (1982) 82 Columbia Law Review 199.
141. ROBINSON, PAUL H, Criminal Law Defenses (2 vols; MN, 1984); Cumulative Supplement (1988); the 2002–3 Supplementation by Myron Moskovitz.
142. ROBINSON, PAUL H, ‘Causing the Conditions of One’s Own Defense. A Study in the Limits of Theory in Criminal Law Doctrine’ (1985) 71 Virginia Law Review 1. (This article was also published in the book by Eser and Fletcher, Justification and Excuse, vol 1 at 657).
143. ROBINSON, PAUL H, ‘Letter to the Editor’ (1989) 23 Israel Law Review 189.
144. ROBINSON, PAUL H, ‘Competing Theories of Justification: Deeds v. Reasons’ in AP Simester and ATH Smith Harm and Culpability (Oxford, 1996) 45.
145. ROBINSON, PAUL H, Criminal Law (New York, 1997).
146. ROBINSON, PAUL H, ‘Theft of the Bomb: On the Substance of the Justification Defenses’ (1999) 22 Tel Aviv University Law Review 65 (Hebrew).
147. ROSEN, CJ, ‘The Excuse of Self-Defense: Correcting a Historical Accident on Behalf of Battered Women who Kill’ (1986) 96 American University Law Review 11.
148. Russell on Crime, 12th edn by JWC Turner (London, 1964).
149. RYAN, CC, ‘Self-Defense, Pacifism, and the Possibility of Killing’ (1983) 93 Ethics 508.
150. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘Solicitation by Omission: Is it Indeed Impossible?’ (1987) 16 Mishpatim 482 (Hebrew).
151. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘Will the ‘Purposes’ in Criminal Offences become ‘Motives’? And is the ‘Dolus Indirectus’ Moving in a New Direction? (More on ‘With Intent to Injure’ as an Element of the Criminal Offence of Defamation and on the Interpretation of the Criminal Law)’ (1988) 18 Mishpatim 337 (Hebrew).
152. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘Interpretational Acrobatics in Criminal Law and a Quiet Death to the Rule of Restrictive Interpretation? (More on ‘With Intent to Injure’ in the Offence of Defamation)’ (1998) 29 Mishpatim 723 (Hebrew).
153. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘On Capital Punishment in General and on the Death Penalty for Murder Committed During a Terrorist Act in Particular’ (2002) 2 Alei Mishpat 127 (Hebrew).
154. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘Broad Construction in Criminal Law?! On the Supreme Court Chief Justice as a Super Legislator and Eulogizing the “Strict Construction Rule”’ (2003) 3 Alei Mishpat 165 (Hebrew).
155. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘The Necessity of Corroboration to Confession’ (2005) 4 Alei Mishpat 245 (Hebrew).
156. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘A New Defense for Self-Defense’ (forthcoming, (2006) 9 Buffalo Criminal Law Review).
157. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘Do We Need More Incarceration? On the Proposed Amendment to the Penal Law for Guiding Judicial Sentencing Discretion’ (2006) 5 Alei Mishpat 247 (Hebrew).
158. SANGERO BOAZ, ‘Are All Forms of Joint Crime Really “Organized Crime”? On the New Israeli Combating Criminal Organizations Law and Parallel Legislation in the U.S. and Other Countries’ (forthcoming, 29 Loyola International & Comparative Law Review).
159. SANGERO, BOAZ and KREMNITZER, MORDECHAI, ‘Retrial: Reality or Dream? Defeat of Justice by Finality of Proceedings’ (1999) 1 Alei Mishpat 97 (Hebrew).
160. SCHNEIDER, EM, ‘Preface’ (1986-89) 9–11 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 191.
161. SCHNEIDER, EM, ‘Describing and Changing: Women’s Self-Defense Work and the Problem of Expert Testimony on Battering’ (1986–89) 9-11 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 195.
162. SCHNEIDER, EM and JORDAN, SB, ‘Representation of Women who Defend themselves in Response to Physical or Sexual Assault’ (1978) 4 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 149 (This article was also published in the book by Bochnack, Women’s Self-Defense Cases: Theory and Practice at 1).
163. SCHOPP, ROBERT F, Justification Defenses and Just Convictions (Cambridge, 1998).
164. SHELEFF, L, ‘Disobedience to the Law for Conscience Reasons’ in R Gavison (ed) Civil Rights In Israel: A collection of Articles in Honor of Justice Haim H. Cohn (1982) 117 (Hebrew).
165. SHUCHMAN, P, ‘Ethics and the Problem of Necessity’ (1966) 39 Temple Law Quarterly 279.
166. SHUTE, STEPHEN and SIMESTER, AP (eds) Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford, 2002).
167. SILVING, H, Constituent Elements of Crime (Springfield, IL, 1967).
168. SILVING, H, Criminal Justice (Buffalo, NY, 1971) vol 1.
169. SIMESTER, AP. and SMITH, ATH, (eds) Harm and Culpability (Oxford, 1996).
170. SIMESTER, AP. and SULLIVAN, GR, Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine, 2nd edn (Oxford and Portland, OR, 2003).
171. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: Palmer v. R.; Irving v. R.’ (1971) Crim LR 649.
172. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: R. v. McInnes’ (1971) Crim LR 652.
173. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: R. v. Williams (Gladstone)’ (1984) Crim LR 163.
174. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: R. v. Corrigan’ (1985) Crim LR 388.
175. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: R. v. Bird (Debbie)’ (1985) Crim LR 389.
176. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: Sears v. Broome’ (1986) Crim LR 462.
177. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: R. v. O’Grady’ (1987) Crim LR 707.
178. SMITH, JC, ‘Commentary: Beckford v. R.’ (1988) Crim LR 117.
179. SMITH, JC, Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (London, 1989).
180. SMITH, JC, ‘The Use of Force in Public or Private Defence and Article 2 of the ECHR’ (2002) Crim LR 958.
181. SMITH, JC and HOGAN, B, Criminal Law, 9th edn (London, 1999).
182. STEIN, A, ‘After Hunt: The Burden of Proof, Risk of Non-Persuasion and Judicial Pragmatism’ (1991) 54 MLR 570.
183. STEIN, A, ‘Criminal Defenses and the Burden of Proof’ (1991) 28 Coexistence 133.
184. STEPHEN, JF, History of the Criminal Law of England (London, 1883).
185. STEPHEN, JF, A Digest of the Criminal Law, 9th edn by LF Sturge (London, 1950).
186. STRATENWERTH, G, ‘The Problem of Mistake in Self-Defense’ (1986) Brigham Young University Law Review 733. (This article was also published in the book by Eser and Fletcher, Justification and Excuse (Freiburg, 1987) vol 2 at 1055).
187. TAYLOR, LJ, ‘Provoked Reason in Men and Women: Heat of Passion Manslaughter and Imperfect Self-Defense’ (1986) 33 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 1679.
188. TEDESCHI, G et al, The Law of Civil Wrongs: The General Part (1976) (Hebrew).
189. THOMSON, JR, ‘Self-Defense and Rights’ in JR Thomson, Rights, Restitution and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory, ed by W Parent (Cambridge and London, 1986) 33.
190. Uniacke, Suzanne, Permissible Killing: The Self-Defence Justification of Homicide (Cambridge, 1994).
191. VARHAFTIG, A, ‘Self Defence in Crimes of Murder and Injury’ (1977) 81 Sinai 48 (Hebrew).
192. WALKER, LE, ‘A Response to Elizabeth M. Schneider’s “Describing and Changing . . .” ’ (1986–89) 9–11 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 223.
193. WALLERSTEIN, SHLOMIT, ‘Justifying the Right to Self-Defense: A Theory of Forced Consequences’ (2005) 91 Virginia Law Review 999.
194. WASSERMAN, D, ‘Justifying Self-Defense’ (1987) 16 Philosophy and Public Affairs 356.
195. WEISMAN, JOSHUA, The Land Law, 1969: A Critical Analysis (1970) (Hebrew).
196. WELLS, C, ‘Domestic Violence and Self-Defence’ (1990) NLJ 127.
197. WILLIAMS, G, Criminal Law: The General Part, 2nd edn (London, 1961).
198. WILLIAMS, G, ‘The Theory of Excuses’ (1982) Crim LR 732.
199. WILLIAMS, G, Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd edn (London, 1983).
200. YADIN, U, ‘The Bad and Good Samaritan’ (1970) 2 Mishpatim 252 (Hebrew).
201. YEO, SMH, ‘New Developments in the Law of Self-Defence in Australia’ (1987) 7 OJLS 489.
202. YEO, SMH, ‘The Demise of Excessive Self-Defence in Australia’ (1988) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 348.
203. YEO, SMH, ‘The Element of Belief in Self-Defence’ (1989) 12 Sydney Law Review 132.
204. ZUCKERMAN, AAS, ‘Coercion and the Judicial Ascertainment of Truth’ (1989) 23 Israel Law Review 357.