Private self-defence and necessity in german penal law and in the penal law proposal — some remarks

Israel Law Review

Volumn 30, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 171-187

  Bernsmann, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920713105     PISSN: 00212237     EISSN: 20479336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002122370001503X     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Concerning the history of self-defence see the survey by Bernsmann, “Entschuldigung” durch Notstand (Koln, Berlin, Bonn, Munchen, 1989) S. 257 f.
2. Refer to the following- Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, Strafgesetzbuch (25 Aufl., Munchen, 1994) § 32, Rn. 19 ff.
3. Jescheck/Weigend, Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, Allgemeiner Teil, (5 Aufl., Berlin, 1996) § 32 II lc)
4. Roxin, Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, (2 Aufl., Munchen, 1994) § 15, Rn. 1 ff.
5. BGHSt, vol. 27, S. 336 (339)
6. Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 13 ff.
7. BGHSt, vol. 26,256 ff.; 147 ff.
8. Dreher-Trondle, Strafgesetzbuch, (47 Aufl., Munchen, 1995) § 32 Rn 16 d).
9. For more details see. Jescheck/Weigend, § 32 2b)
10. Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, § 32, Rn. 34, both Strafgesetzbuch.
11. For further details, see Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, Strafgesetzbuch, at § 32, Rn. 1 ff.
12. Roxin, Strafgesetzbuch, at § 15, Rn.1.
13. See also BGHSt, vol. 24, 356 (359).
14. For more details see: Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, § 32, Rn. 3
15. Roxin, § 15, Rn. 6, both at BGHSt
16. Dreher/Tröndle, BGHSt, at § 32 Rn. 4.
17. Jescheck/Weigend, BGHSt, at § 32 II la).
18. See for further details: Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 10.
19. As, for example, Jescheck/Weigend, BGHSt, at § 32 II la).
20. Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 3.
21. For more details see Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 13 ff
22. Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 20
23. Critical Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 21 ff.
24. For more details see: Jescheck/Weigend, BGHSt, at § 32 II 1
25. also Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 10.
26. Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 5 a).
27. General opinion, see: Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32 Rn. 5c.
28. For the latest discussion see Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15 Rn. 39.
29. So precisely the view of the legislator of the PC, quoted from Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 2, quotation 1.
30. Examples from judicature: BGHSt, vol. 24, 348; vol. 25, 229; vol. 26, 256; vol. 27, 336; 313.
31. See Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15 Rn. 42 f.
32. See Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 37; 50.
33. For more details see Schbnke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 49.
34. Example also mentioned by Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 32, Rn. 51.
35. As BGH MDR 1979, S. 985
36. quoted from Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGH MDR, at § 32, Rn. 37.
37. Refer to the following: Dreher/Tröndle, BGH MDR, at § 32, Rn. 19
38. Jescheck/Weigend, BGH MDR, at § 32 III 3a)
39. Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGH MDR, at § 32, Rn. 52.
40. See the detailed discussion in Roxin, BGH MDR, at § 15, Rn. 56 ff.
41. For instance BGHSt, vol. 24, 358; vol. 26, 145.
42. Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, § 32, Rn. 57, both in BGHSt.
43. Also criticizing German courts, Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 81 ff.
44. For more details see Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 87.
45. For further details see Roxin, BGHSt, at § 15, Rn. 89.
46. See Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 7 ff.
47. See Schcnke/Schrbder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 9
48. Dreher/Trondle, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 3.
49. For more details see Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 34 Rn. 13, 14, 15.
50. For more details see Schonke/Schroder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 34 Rn. 17
51. Dreher/ Trondle, BGHSt, at § 33, Rn. 4.
52. For further details see Schönke/Schroder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 18
53. Dreher/ Trondle, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 5.
54. See Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 22 ff, with many examples from German courts.
55. For more details see Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 23 ff.
56. See for further information Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 45.
57. For more details: Schönke/Schröder/Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 42
58. Dreher/ Tröndle, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 6
59. Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 50 ff.
60. The dispute is discussed in Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 43.
61. See especially BGHSt, vol. 27, 260
62. Dreher/Trondle, BGHSt, at § 34, Rn. 24
63. Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 88.
64. Concerning the different theories see the survey by Bernsmann, “Entschuldigung” durch Notstand, BGHSt, at S. 174 ff.
65. See Roxin, BGHSt, at § 22, Rn. 22 ff.
66. Critical towards the common theories, Bernsmann, “Entschuldigung” durch Notstand, BGHSt, at S. 109 ff.
67. See Dreher/Tröndle, BGHSt, at § 35, Rn. 8
68. Schönke / Schröder / Lenckner, BGHSt, at § 35 Rn. 16.
69. See Dreher/Tröndle, BGHSt, at Rn. 16
70. Roxin, BGHSt, at § 22, Rn. 49.
71. About the latest discussion see Roxin, BGHSt, at § 16, Rn. 57 ff.