Measuring academic research impact: creating a citation profile using the conceptual framework for implementation fidelity as a case study

Scientometrics

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 1329-1340

  Carroll, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citations; Impact; Implementation fidelity; Scientific influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979523512     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2085-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bjork, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2015). Article processing charges in OA journals: Relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics, 103, 373–385.
2. Booth, A. (2008). Implementing EBLIP: If it works in Edmonton will it work in Newcastle? Health Information and Libraries Journal, 25, 154–157.
3. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 40.
4. Carroll, C., Rick, J., Pilgrim, H., Cameron, J., & Hillage, J. (2010). Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 607–621.
5. Chandler, C. (2014). What is the meaning of impact in relation to research and why does it matter? A view from inside academia. In P. Denicolo (Ed.), Achieving impact in research. New York: Sage.
6. Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 845–859.
7. Field, B., Booth, A., Illott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review. Implementation Science, 9, 172.
8. Harzing, A., & Van Der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Enviornmental Politics, 8, 61–73.
9. Hasson, H., Blomberg, S., & Duner, A. (2012). Fidelity and moderating factors in complex interventions: A case study of a continuum of care program for frail elderly people in health and social care. Implementation Science, 7, 23.
10. Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Stewart, L., & Tierney, J. (2007). Time to publication for results of clinical trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), MR000011. doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub2.
11. Last, J. (1995). A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Leaviss, J., & Uttley, L. (2015). Psychotherapeutic benefits of compassion-focused therapy: An early systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 45, 927–945.
13. Lortie, C., Aarssen, L., Budden, A., & Leimu, R. (2013). Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology. Scientometrics, 94, 675–682.
14. National Library of Medicine (NLM). (2016). Medical subject headings (MeSH). Accessed April 29, 2016, from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/.
15. Ravallion, M., & Wagstaff, A. (2011). On measuring scholarly influence by citations. Scientometrics, 88, 321–337.
16. R. E. F. (2014). REF 2014. Accessed April 26, 2016, from http://www.ref.ac.uk/.
17. Rice, K. (2011). Change over time in implementation fidelity of a child welfare practice model. PhD dissertion, University of Maryland in Baltimore, USA.
18. Rothstein, H., & Hopewell, S. (2009). Grey literature. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Sage.
19. Royle, P., Kandala, N.-B., Barnard, K., & Waugh, N. (2013). Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: Analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Systematic Reviews, 2, 74.
20. Sarli, C., Dubinsky, E., & Holmes, K. (2010). Beyond citation analysis: A model for assessment of research impact. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 98, 17–23.
21. Van Leeuwen, T., Moed, H., Tijssen, R., Visser, N., & Cvan Raan, A. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51, 335–346.
22. Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., Jones, R., & Kain, R. (2015). The metric tide. In Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management, HEFCE.