Improving motor imagery practice with synchronous action observation in stroke patients

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 245-253

  Sun, Yao ^a,b   Wei, Wei ^a   Luo, Zhizeng ^b   Gan, Haitao ^b   Hu, Xiaohua ^c  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HANGZHOU DIANZI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Rehabilitation Center for Brain Damage   (China)

Author keywords

Action observation; Motor imagery; Neurorehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IMAGERY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR IMAGERY PRACTICE; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PINCH STRENGTH; REHABILITATION CARE; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STROKE PATIENT; UPPER LIMB; AGED; EVOKED RESPONSE; IMAGINATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STROKE REHABILITATION;

AGED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84979298954     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1141472     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Platz T, Eickhof C, Van Kaick S, et al. Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: A single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:714-724.
2. Summers JJ, Kagerer FA, Garry MI, Hiraga CY, Loftus A, Cauraugh JH. Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: A TMS study. J Neural Sci. 2007;252:76-82.
3. Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, Dijkhuizen RM, Benner T, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraintinduced movement therapy in stroke patients: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:1-13.
4. Avanzino L, Gueugneau N, Bisio A, Ruggeri P, Papaxanthis C, Bore M. Motor cortical plasticity induced by motor learning through mental practice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:1-10.
5. Vries SD, Mulder T. Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: A critical discussion. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:5-13.
6. Prasad G, Herman P, Coyle D, McDonough S, Crosbie J. Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: A feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;7:60-77.
7. Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: Cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm. 2007;114:1265-1278.
8. Porro C, Cettolo V, Francescato M, Baraldi P. Ipsilateral involvement of primary motor cortex during motor imagery. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:3059-3063.
9. Sharma N, Baron JC. Does motor imagery share neural networks with executed movement: A multivariate fMRI analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:564-570.
10. Pfurtscheller G, Silva de FL. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110:1842-1857.
11. Johnson SH. Imagining the impossible: Intact motor representations in hemiplegics. NeuroReport. 2000;11:729-732.
12. Johnson-Frey SH. Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain Cognition. 2004;55:328-331.
13. Ang KK, Guan C, Chua KSG, Ang BT, Kuah CWK, Wang C, Phua KS, Chin ZY, Zhang H. A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use an EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42:253-258.
14. Müller K, Bütefisch C, Seitz R, Hömberg V. Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke. Restor Neurol Neuros. 2007;25:501-511.
15. Page SJ, Szaflarski JP, Eliassen JC, Pan H, Cramer SC. Cortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:382-388.
16. Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC, Joice S, Scott CL, MacWalter RS, et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: Randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 2011;134:1373-1386.
17. Tomasino B, Rumiati R, Umiltá C. Selective deficit of motor imagery as tapped by a left-right decision of visually presented hands. Brain Cognition. 2003;53:376-380.
18. Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:842-852.
19. Butler AJ, Page SJ. Mental practice with motor imagery: Evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:S2-11.
20. Grézes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation and verb generation of action: A metaanalysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;12:1-19.
21. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, Poline JB, Gaymard B, et al. Paroverlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movement. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:1093-1104.
22. Samuelkamaleshkumar S, Reethajanetsureka S, Pauljebaraj P, Benshamir B, et al. Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:2001-2005.
23. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999;353:2035-2036.
24. Dhole C, Pullen J, Nankaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbet H. MT promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:209-217.
25. Thieme H, Bayn M, Wurg M, Zange C, Pohl M, Behren J. MT for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke-a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:314-324.
26. Wu CY, Huang PC, Chen YT, Lin KC, Yang HW. Effect of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1023-1030.
27. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage. 2001;14:S103-S109.
28. Munzert J, Lorey B, Zentgraf K. Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Rev. 2009;60:306-326.
29. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996;263:377-386.
30. Conson M, Sarà M, Pistoia F, Trojano L. Action observation improve motor imagery: specific interactions between simulative processes. Exp Brain Res. 2009;199:71-81.
31. Stevens J, Stoykov M. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1090-1092.
32. Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Schlogl A, Lugger K. Separability of EEG signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters. IEEE T Rehabil Eng. 1998;6:316-325.
33. Solis-Escalante T, Müller-Putz G, Brunner C, Kaiser V, Pfurtscheller G. Analysis of sensorimotor rhythms for the implementation of a brain switch for healthy subjects. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2010;5:15-20.
34. Neuper C, Wörtz M, Pfurtscheller G. ERD/ERS patterns reflecting sensorimotor activation and deactivation. Prog Brain Res. 2006;159:211-222.
35. Neuper C, Scherver R, Reiner M, Pfurtscheller G. Imagery of motor actions: Differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Cognitive Brain Res. 2005;25:668-677.
36. Pineda JA. The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating "seeing" and "hearing" into "doing". Brain Res Rev. 2005;50:57-68.
37. Lapenta OM, Boggio PS. Motor network activation during human action observation and imagery: Mu rhythm EEG evidence on typical and atypical neurodevelopment. Res Autism Spect Dis. 2014;8:759-766.
38. Davision A, Hinkley D. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
39. Graimann B, Huggins J, Levine S, Pfurtscheller G. Visualization of significant ERD/ERS patterns in multichannel EEG and ECoG data. Clin Physiol. 2002;113:43-47.
40. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The poststroke hemiplegic patient I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
41. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232-240.
42. Pandian S, Narayan K. Stroke-related motor outcome measures: Do they quantify the neurophysiological aspects of upper extremity recovery? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18:412-423.
43. Dromerick A, Edwards D, Hahn M. Does the application of constraintinduced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31:2984-2988.
44. Thalheimer W, Cook S. How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work-learning research. 2002;1-9. http://www.worklearning.com/effect_sizes.htm. Accessed August
45. Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, Ota N, Ito M, et al. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: A preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:951-957.
46. Baeck JS, Kim YT, Seo JH, Ryeom HK, Lee J, et al. Brain activation patterns of motor imagery reflect plastic changes associated with intensive shooting training. Behav Brain Res. 2012;234:26-32.
47. Binkofski F, Buccino G. The role of ventral premotor cortex in action execution and action understanding. J Physiol Paris. 2006;99:396-405.
48. Handy TC, Borg JS, Turk DJ, Tipper CM, Grafton ST, Gazzaniga MS. Placing a tool in the spotlight: Spatial attention modulates visuomotor responses in cortex. NeuroImage. 2005;26:266-276.