A patient-centered system in a providercentered world: Challenges of incorporating post-discharge wound data into practice

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 514-525

  Sanger, Patrick C ^a   Hartzler, Andrea ^b   Lordon, Ross J ^a   Al Armstrong, Cheryl ^c   Lober, William B ^a   Evans, Heather L ^c   Pratt, Wanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissent and disputes; Mobile health; Patient engagement; Patient centered care; Surgical wound infection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFLICT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; E-MAIL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUNDED THEORY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MOBILE APPLICATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CODING; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; AFTERCARE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT; TELEMEDICINE; TEXT MESSAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AFTERCARE; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; SELF REPORT; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TELEMEDICINE; TEXT MESSAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84979037029     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv183     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Hansen MM, Miron-Shatz T, Lau AYS, et al. Big Data in science and healthcare: a review of recent literature and perspectives. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group. Yearb Med Inform. 2014;9:21-26.
2. Appelboom G, LoPresti M, Reginster J-Y, et al. The quantified patient: a patient participatory culture. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:2585-2587.
3. Kendall L, Morris D, DT. Blood Pressure Beyond the Clinic: Rethinking a Health Metric for Everyone. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2015. 2015: In press.
4. Chung AE, Basch EM. Incorporating the patient's voice into electronic health records through patient-reported outcomes as the 'review of systems.' JAMIA. 2015;22:914-916.
5. DHHS. Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs-Stage 3. 2014. http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201410&RIN=0938-AS26. Accessed January 20, 2015.
6. Tang P, Hripcsak G. Draft Recommendations for Meaningful Use Stage 3. Aug 2013. http://www.healthit.gov/facas/sites/faca/files/muwg_stage3_ draft_rec_07_aug_13_.v3.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2015.
7. ONC. 2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition Base Electronic Health Record (EHR) Definition, and ONC Health IT Certification Program Modifications. March 2015. https:// www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/03/30/2015-06612/2015-editionhealth- information-technology-health-it-certification-criteria-2015-editionbase. Accessed April 17, 2015.
8. DHHS, CMS. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program-Stage 3. March 2015. https://www.federalregister. gov/articles/2015/03/30/2015-06685/medicare-and-medicaid-programs- electronic-health-record-incentive-program-stage-3. Accessed April 17, 2015.
9. Deering MJ. Issue Brief: Patient-Generated Health Data and Health IT. December 2013. www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/pghd_brief_final122 013.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2015.
10. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Flip the Clinic. http://fliptheclinic.org/. Accessed April 17, 2015.
11. Swan M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6:492-525.
12. National eHealth Collaborative, ONC. Patient-Generated Health Information Technical Expert Panel Final Report. December 2013. http://www.healthit.gov/ sites/default/files/pghi_tep_finalreport121713.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2015.
13. Krist AH, Woolf SH. A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA. 2011;305:300-301.
14. Meyers D, Quinn M, Clancy C. Health information technology: turning the patient- centered medical home from concept to reality. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26:154-156.
15. Nundy S, Lu C-YE, Hogan P, et al. Using patient-generated health data from mobile technologies for diabetes self-management support: provider perspectives from an academic medical center. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:74-82.
16. CMS. Shared Savings Program: 33 Quality Measures. 2014. http://www. cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/ Downloads/ACO-Shared-Savings-Program-Quality-Measures.pdf. Accessed January 1, 2015.
17. Pew Research Center. Tracking for Health Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/ Tracking-for-Health.aspx. Accessed January 3, 2015.
18. Pew Research Center. Health Online 2013 Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/ Health-online.aspx. Accessed January 3, 2015.
19. Doherty B. Get ready for the 'Uberization' of Medicine. ACP Advocate Blog. http://advocacyblog.acponline.org/2014/08/get-ready-for-uberization- of-medicine.html. Accessed January 19, 2015.
20. Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29 (Suppl 1):S51-S61.
21. Gibson A, Tevis S, Kennedy G. Readmission after delayed diagnosis of surgical site infection: a focus on prevention using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Am J Surg. 2014;207:832-839.
22. Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Association of postdischarge complications with reoperation and mortality in general surgery. Arch Surg. 2012;147:1000-1007.
23. Tanner J, Padley W, Davey S. Patient narratives of surgical site infection: implications for practice. J Hosp Infect. 2012;83:41-45.
24. Seaman M, Lammers R. Inability of patients to self-diagnose wound infections. J Emerg Med. 1991;9:215-219.
25. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care-associated infections. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:2039.
26. Limóon E, Shaw E, Badia JM, et al. Post-discharge surgical site infections after uncomplicated elective colorectal surgery: impact and risk factors. The experience of the VINCat Program. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86:127-132.
27. Wick EC, Shore AD, Hirose K, et al. Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1475-1479.
28. Pieper B, Sieggreen M, Nordstrom CK, et al. Discharge knowledge and concerns of patients going home with a wound. J Wound, Ostomy, Cont Nurs. 2007;34:245-253.
29. Sanger P, Hartzler A, Lober WB, et al. Provider needs assessment for mPOWEr: a mobile tool for post-operative wound evaluation. In: Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symposium. Washington DC. 2013:1236.
30. Sanger PC, Hartzler A, Han SM, et al. Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114016.
31. Johnson CM, Johnson TR, Zhang J. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:75-87.
32. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 9241-210:2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. 2010. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail. htm?csnumber=52075. Accessed March 1, 2015.
33. Flum DR, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Devine EB, et al. Implementation of a 'real-world' learning health care system: Washington state's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network (CERTAIN). Surgery. 2014;155:860-866.
34. Sanger PC, Hartzler A, Lober WB, et al. Design considerations for post-acute care mHealth: patient perspectives. In: Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symposium. Washington DC. 2014:1920-1929.
35. Chell E. Critical incident technique. In: Symon G, Cassell C, eds. Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications; 1998:51-72.
36. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993.
37. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory - Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
38. Shapiro M, Johnston D, Wald J, et al. Patient-Generated Health Data: White paper prepared for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT by RTI International. April 2012. www.rti.org/pubs/patientgeneratedhealthdata.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2014.
39. Georgsson M, Staggers N. Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics. JAMIA. 2015. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv099.
40. Ratwani RM, Fairbanks RJ, Hettinger AZ, et al. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. JAMIA. 2015. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv050.
41. Veinot TC, Campbell TR, Kruger DJ, et al. A question of trust: user-centered design requirements for an informatics intervention to promote the sexual health of African-American youth. JAMIA. 2013;20:758-765.
42. Connelly K, Siek KA, Chaudry B, et al. An offline mobile nutrition monitoring intervention for varying-literacy patients receiving hemodialysis: a pilot study examining usage and usability. JAMIA. 2012;19:705-712.
43. Haggstrom DA, Saleem JJ, Russ AL, et al. Lessons learned from usability testing of the VA's personal health record. JAMIA. 2011;18:i13-i17.
44. Sox CM, Gribbons WM, Loring BA, et al. Patient-centered design of an information management module for a personally controlled health record. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e36.
45. Liu LS, Shih PC, Hayes GR. Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. New York: ACM Press 2011:363-370.
46. Weitzman ER, Kaci L, Mandl KD. Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e14.
47. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. JAMIA. 2006;13:121-126.
48. Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Wald JS, et al. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an electronic health record designed to improve medication safety: the Patient Gateway medications module. Inform Prim Care. 2008;16:147-155.
49. Ralston JD, Carrell D, Reid R, et al. Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. JAMIA. 2007;14:798-806.
50. Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, et al. Who uses the patient Internet portal? the PatientSite experience. JAMIA. 2006;13:91-95.
51. Leveille SG, Walker J, Ralston JD, et al. Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:32.
52. Urowitz S, Wiljer D, Dupak K, et al. Improving diabetes management with a patient portal: a qualitative study of diabetes self-management portal. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e158.
53. Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. JAMIA. 2004;11:505-513.
54. Jacobs M, Clawson J, Mynatt ED. Comparing health information sharing preferences of cancer patients, doctors, and navigators. In: Proc. CSCW New York, NY; 2015: 808-818.
55. North F, Crane SJ, Stroebel RJ, et al. Patient-generated secure messages and eVisits on a patient portal: are patients at risk? JAMIA. 2013;20: 1143-1149.
56. Walker J, Meltsner M, Delbanco T. US experience with doctors and patients sharing clinical notes. BMJ. 2015;350:g7785.