Incorporating the patient's voice into electronic health records through patient-reported outcomes as the "review of systems"

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 914-916

  Chung, Arlene E ^a   Basch, Ethan M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic health records; Patient engagement; Patient centered care; Patient reported outcomes; Review of systems

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICIAN; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; STANDARDIZATION; VOICE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INFORMATION PROCESSING; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DATA COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84964695142     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocu007     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. CMS. Medicare Physician fee Schedule Look-up. [cited 1/19/2014]. http://www. cms.gov/apps/physician-fee-schedule/overview.aspx Accessed July 1, 2014.
2. Brundage M, Blazeby J, Revicki D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(6):1161-1175.
3. Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, et al. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(34):4249-4255.
4. Basch E, Torda P, Adams K. Standards for patient-reported outcome-based performance measures. JAMA. 2013;310(2):139-140.
5. Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, et al. How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(17): 3485-3490.
6. Petersen MA, Larsen H, Pedersen L, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: comparing patient and physician assessments. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(8):1159-1166.
7. Economics M. The Top 100 EHR Companies. 2013 [cited 1/14/2014]. http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/medical-economics/news/top- 100-ehr-companies-part-1-4?page=0 Accessed July 1, 2014.
8. CMS. Evaluation and Management Services Guide. December 2010 [cited 1/1/2014]. http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/eval_mgmt_serv_guide-ICN006764. pdf Accessed July 1, 2014.
9. Wu AW, Snyder C, Clancy CM, et al. Adding the patient perspective to comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff. 2010;29(10):1863-1871.
10. Wu AW, Kharrazi H, Boulware LE, et al. Measure once, cut twice-adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8 Suppl): S12-S20.
11. Minnesota Community Measurement. Minnesota health scores overview (2014). [cited 1/14/2014]. http://www.mnhealthscores.org Accessed July 1, 2014.
12. Gilbert JE, Howell D, King S, et al. Quality improvement in cancer symptom assessment and control: the Provincial Palliative Care Integration Project (PPCIP). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;43(4):663-678.
13. Reeve B, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, et al. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(7):129-131.
14. Cleeland CS, Zhao F, Chang VT, et al. The symptom burden of cancer: evidence for a core set of cancer-related and treatment-related symptoms from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4333-4340.