Indirect three-dimensional printing: A method for fabricating polyurethane-urea based cardiac scaffolds

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 104, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1912-1921

  Hernandez Cordova R ^a   Mathew, D A ^b   Balint, R ^c   Carrillo Escalante, H J ^a   Cervantes Uc, J M ^a   Hidalgo Bastida, L A ^b   Hernandez Sanchez F ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac tissue engineering; indirect 3D printing; polyurethane urea; rapid prototyping; scaffold fabrication

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS; BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; HEART; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; METABOLISM; POLYURETHANES; POLYVINYL ALCOHOLS; PRINTING; RAPID PROTOTYPING; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; UREA;

3-D PRINTING; BIOMATERIAL SCAFFOLDS; CARDIAC TISSUE ENGINEERING; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION; POLYCAPROLACTONE-BASED POLYURETHANES; POLYURETHANE UREA; SCAFFOLD FABRICATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) PRINTING;

3D PRINTERS;

POLYMER; POLYURETHAN; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; UREA; WATER;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; CARDIAC MUSCLE CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CELL VIABILITY; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; HEART; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PERFUSION; POROSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

PHYSIOLOGY; POLYURETHANES; PRINTING; SCAFFOLDS; SYNTHESIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL DESIGN;

EID: 84978942693     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35721     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Chiu LLY, Radisic M. Cardiac tissue engineering. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2013;2:41–52.
2. Barton P, Andronis L, Briggs A, McPherson K, Capewell S. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: Modelling study. BMJ 2011;343:d4044.
3. Taylor DA, Sampaio LC, Gobin A. Building new hearts: A review of trends in cardiac tissue engineering. Am J Transplant 2014;14:2448–2459.
4. Boffito M, Sartori S, Ciardelli G. Polymeric scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: Requirements and fabrication technologies. Polym Int 2014;63:2–11.
5. Generali M, Dijkman PE, Hoerstrup SP. Bioresorbable scaffolds for cardiovascular tissue engineering. EMJ Int Cardiol 2014;1:91–99.
6. May-Hernández L, Hernández-Sánchez F, Gómez-Ribelles JL, Sabater Serra R. Segmented poly(urethane-urea) elastomers based on polycaprolactone: Structure and properties. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;119:2093–2104.
7. Guan J, Sacks MS, Beckman EJ, Wagner WR. Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of elastomeric, biodegradable poly(ester-urethane)ureas based on poly(caprolactone) and putrescine. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:493–503.
8. Hong Y, Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Hashizume R, Pelinescu AL, Wagner WR. Tailoring the degradation kinetics of poly(ester-carbonate urethane)urea thermoplastic elastomers for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2010;31:4249–4258.
9. Tabor CW, Tabor H. 1,4-diaminobutane (putrescine), spermidine and spermine. Annu Rev Biochem 1976;45:285–306.
10. Cauich-Rodríguez JV, Chan-Chan LH, Hernández-Sánchez F, Cervantes-Uc JM. Degradation of polyurethanes for cardiovascular applications. In: Pignatello R, editor. Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications. Croacia: InTech; 2013. p 51–82.
11. Guan J, Sacks MS, Beckman EJ, Wagner WR. Biodegradable poly(ether ester urethane)urea elastomers based on poly(ether ester) triblock copolymers and putrescine: Synthesis, characterization and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 2004;25:85–96.
12. Park JH, Jung JW, Kang HW, Cho DW. Indirect three-dimensional printing of synthetic polymer scaffold based on thermal molding process. Biofabrication 2014;6:1–10.
13. Lebourg M, Sabater Serra R, Más Estellés J, Hernández-Sánchez F, Gómez-Ribelles JL, Suay Antón J. Biodegradable polycaprolactone scaffold with controlled porosity obtained by modified particle-leaching technique. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2008;19:2047–2053.
14. Yeong W-Y, Chua C-K, Leong K-F, Chandrasekaran M. Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: Challenges and potential. Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:643–652.
15. Yeong WY, Sudarmadji N, Yu HY, Chua CK, Leong KF, Venkatraman SS, Boey YC, Tan LP. Porous polycaprolactone scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering fabricated by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater 2010;6:2028–2034.
16. Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H. Biodegradable polymers. In: Chamy R, Rosenkranz F, editors. Biodegradation – Life of Science. Rijeka: InTech; 2013. p 141–185.
17. Vrana NE, Liu Y, McGuinness GB, Cahill PA. Characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan hydrogels as vascular tissue engineering scaffolds. Macromol Symp 2008;269:106–110.
18. Akhyari P, Fedak PWM, Weisel RD, Lee T-YJ, Verma S, Mickle DAG, Li R-K. Mechanical stretch regimen enhances the formation of bioengineered autologous cardiac muscle grafts. Circulation 2002;106:I-137–I-142.
19. Pickover C. Archimedes to Hawking: Laws of Science and the Great Minds Behind Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. 528 p.
20. Müller M, Mazur AJ, Behrmann E, Diensthuber RP, Radke MB, Qu Z, Littwitz C, Raunser S, Schoenenberger C-A, Manstein DJ, Mannherz HG. Functional characterization of the human α-cardiac actin mutations Y166C and M305L involved in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012;69:3457–3479.
21. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Harley BA. Cellular Material in Nature and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 309 p.
22. Chan-Chan LH, Solis-Correa R, Vargas-Coronado RF, Cervantes-Uc JM, Cauich-Rodríguez JV, Quintana P, Bartolo-Pérez P. Degradation studies on segmented polyurethanes prepared with HMDI, PCL and different chain extenders. Acta Biomater 2010;6:2035–2044.
23. Chan-Chan LH, Tkaczyk C, Vargas-Coronado RF, Cervantes-Uc JM, Tabrizian M, Cauich-Rodriguez JV. Characterization and biocompatibility studies of new degradable poly(urea)urethanes prepared with arginine, glycine or aspartic acid as chain extenders. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2013;24:1733–1744.
24. Chen Q-Z, Bismarck A, Hansen U, Junaid S, Tran MQ, Harding SE, Ali NN, Boccaccini AR. Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly(glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. Biomaterials 2008;29:47–57.
25. Courtney T, Sacks MS, Stankus J, Guan J, Wagner WR. Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic soft tissue mechanical anisotropy. Biomaterials 2006;27:3631–3638.
26. Chimenti I, Rizzitelli G, Gaetani R, Angelini F, Ionta V, Forte E, Frati G, Schussler O, Barbetta A, Messina E, Dentini M, Giacomello A. Human cardiosphere-seeded gelatin and collagen scaffolds as cardiogenic engineered bioconstructs. Biomaterials 2011;32:9271–9281.
27. Araña M, Peña E, Abizanda G, Cilla M, Ochoa I, Gavira JJ, Espinosa G, Doblaré M, Pelacho B, Prosper F. Preparation and characterization of collagen-based ADSC-carrier sheets for cardiovascular application. Acta Biomater 2013;9:6075–6083.
28. Chan V, Raman R, Cvetkovic C, Bashir R. Enabling microscale and nanoscale approaches for bioengineered cardiac tissue. ACS Nano 2013;7:1830–1837.
29. Fleischer S, Feiner R, Shapira A, Ji J, Sui X, Wagner HD, Dvir T. Spring-like fibers for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2013;34:8599–8606.
30. Godier-Furnémont AFG, Martens TP, Koeckert MS, Wan L, Parks J, Arai K, Zhang G, Hudson B, Homma S, Vunjak-Novakovik G. Composite scaffold provides a cell delivery platform for cardiovascular repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:7974–7979.
31. Chiono V, Mozetic P, Boffito M, Sartori S, Gioffredi E, Silvestri A, Rainer A, Giannitelli SM, Trombetta M, Nurzynska D, Di Meglio F, Castaldo C, Miraglia R, Montagni S, Ciardelli G. Polyurethane-based scaffolds for myocardial tissue engineering. Interface Focus 2014;4:20130045.
32. Volkmer E, Drosse I, Otto S, Stangelmayer A, Stengele M, Kallukalam BC, Mutschler W, Schieker M. Hypoxia in static and dynamic 3D culture systems for tissue engineering of bone. Tissue Eng Part a 2008;14:1331–1340.
33. Volkmer E, Otto S, Polzer H, Saller M, Trappendreher D, Zagar D, Hamisch S, Ziegler G, Wilhelmi A, Mutschler W, Schieker M. Overcoming hypoxia in 3D culture systems for tissue engineering of bone in vitro using an automated, oxygen-triggered feedback loop. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23:2793–2801.
34. Melchels FPW, Tonnarelli B, Olivares AL, Martin I, Lacroix D, Feijen J, Wendt DJ, Grijpma DW. The influence of the scaffold design on the distribution of adhering cells after perfusion cell seeding. Biomaterials 2011;32:2878–2884.