Toward a Standardized Reporting of Outcomes in Hand Osteoarthritis: Developing a Common Metric of Outcome Measures Commonly Used to Assess Functioning

Arthritis Care and Research

Volumn 68, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1115-1127

  Prodinger, Birgit ^a,b   Stamm, Tanja ^c   Peterson, Diana ^b   Stucki, Gerold ^a,b   Tennant, Alan ^a,b  

^a WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIAN CANADIAN INDEX FOR HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COCHIN SCALE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEX FOR HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; HAND FUNCTION; HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84978906060     PISSN: 2151464X     EISSN: 21514658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22816     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kostanjsek N. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health 2011;11 Suppl 4:S3.
2. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:565–71.
3. Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kvien TK, et al. Activity limitations and participation restrictions in women with hand osteoarthritis: patients’ descriptions and associations between dimensions of functioning. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1633–8.
4. Kloppenburg M. Hand osteoarthritis: an increasing need for treatment and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007;19:179–83.
5. Bijsterbosch J, Watt I, Meulenbelt I, Rosendaal F, Huizinga T, Kloppenburg M. Clinical and radiographic disease course of hand osteoarthritis and determinants of outcome after 6 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:68–73.
6. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Loge JH, Kvien TK. Health-related quality of life in women with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: a comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, healthy controls, and normative data. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1404–9.
7. Petersson IF, Jacobsson LT. Osteoarthritis of the peripheral joints. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2002;16:741–60.
8. Stoffer MA, Smolen JS, Woolf A, Ambrozic A, Berghea F, Boonen A, et al. Development of patient-centered standards of care for osteoarthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net-project. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1145–9.
9. Pencharz JN, MacLean CH. Measuring quality in arthritis care: the Arthritis Foundation's Quality Indicator set for osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:538–48.
10. Losina E, Ranstam J, Collins J, Schnitzer T, Katz J. OARSI clinical trials recommendations: key analytic considerations in design, analysis, and reporting of randomized controlled trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015;23:677–85.
11. Maheu E, Altman R, Bloch D, Doherty M, Hochberg M, Mannoni A, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006;14:303–22.
12. Poole JL. Measures of hand function: Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT), Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN), Cochin Hand Function Scale, Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA), Grip Ability Test (GAT), Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT), and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;Suppl 63:S189–99.
13. Dziedzic K, Thomas E, Hay E. A systematic search and critical review of measures of disability for use in a population survey of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:1–12.
14. Grimby G, Tennant A, Tesio L. The use of raw scores from ordinal scales: time to end malpractice? [editorial]. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:97–8.
15. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
16. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, Gerecz-Simon E, Buchbinder R, Hobby K, et al. Clinimetric properties of the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index: an evaluation of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:863–9.
17. Allen KD, Jordan JM, Renner JB, Kraus VB. Validity, factor structure, and clinical relevance of the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:551–6.
18. Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou G. Sensitivity to change of the functional index for hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995;8:S25–8. [Patternmatch].
19. Poiraudeau S, Chevalier X, Conrozier T, Flippo RM, Liote F, Noel E, et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9:570–7.
20. Guillemin F, Coste J, Pouchot J, Ghézail M, Bregeon C, Sany J. The AIMS2-SF: a short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1267–74.
21. Leeb B, Sautner J, Andel I, Rintelen B. SACRAH: a score for assessment and quantification of chronic rheumatic affections of the hands. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:1173–8.
22. Haugen IK, Moe RH, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, van der Heijde D, Garratt A. The AUSCAN subscales, AIMS-2 hand/finger subscale, and FIOHA were not unidimensional scales. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1039–46.
23. Moe RH, Garratt A, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Maheu E, Mowinckel P, Kvien TK, et al. Concurrent evaluation of data quality, reliability and validity of the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index and the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:2327–36.
24. Stamm T, Mathis M, Aletaha D, Kloppenburg M, Machold K, Smolen J. Mapping hand functioning in hand osteoarthritis: comparing self-report instruments with a comprehensive hand function test. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1230–7.
25. Stamm T, Geyh S, Cieza A, Machold K, Kollerits B, Kloppenburg M, et al. Measuring functioning in patients with hand osteoarthritis: content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:1534–41.
26. Medical University of Vienna. The Vienna Hand Osteoarthritis Cohort. Vienna: Medical University of Vienna; 2015. URL: http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/hp/1/biobank/research/vihoa/.
27. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1601–10.
28. Bruce B, Fries JF. The health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:S14–8. [Patternmatch].
29. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982;9:789–93.
30. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, Buchbinder R, Hobby K, Roth J, et al. Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:855–62.
31. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
32. Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1358–62.
33. Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Meshab M, editors. Rasch models in health. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
34. Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982;47:149–74.
35. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978;43:561–73.
36. Gustafsson JE. Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch model. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1980;33:205–33.
37. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170.
38. Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 2007;46:1–18.
39. Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Tennant A. Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: the functional independence measure (Fim TM) revisited. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:884–92.
40. Wainer H, Kiely GL. Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. J Educ Meas 1987;24:185–201.
41. Reise SP, Morizot J, Hays RD. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Qual Life Res 2007;16 Suppl 1:19–31.
42. Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Jonsdottir IH, Pallant J, Ahlborg G. Internal construct validity of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout questionnaire (SMBQ). BMC Public Health 2012;12:1.
43. Lundgren Nilsson A, Grimby G, Ring H, Tesio L, Lawton G, Slade A, et al. Cross-cultural validity of functional independence measure items in stroke: a study using Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:23–31.
44. Cieza A, Hilfiker R, Boonen A, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun BT, et al. Items from patient-oriented instruments can be integrated into interval scales to operationalize categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:912–21.
45. Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. Rasch models for measurement: RUMM2030. Perth (Western Australia): RUMM Laboratory; 2010.
46. Wu AW, Kharrazi H, Boulware LE, Snyder CF. Measure once, cut twice: adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:S12–20.
47. Andrich D. Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011;11:571–85.
48. Hjollund NH, Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, Riiskjær E, Schougaard LM. Use of patient-reported outcome (pro) measures at group and patient levels: experiences from the generic integrated pro system, westchronic. Interact J Med Res 2014;3:e5.
49. International Organization for Standardization. Health informatics: capacity-based eHealth architecture roadmap. Part 2: architectural components and maturity model. International Standard Organisation; 2014. URL: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=54903.
50. Stamm T, van der Giesen F, Thorstensson C, Steen E, Birrell F, Bauernfeind B, et al. Patient perspective of hand osteoarthritis in relation to concepts covered by instruments measuring functioning: a qualitative European multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1453–60.
51. Maheu E, Berenbaum F. Time for new outcome measures in hand osteoarthritis? Nature Clin Pract Rheumatol 2009;5:136–8.
52. McKenna SP. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Medicine 2011;9:86.