Concurrent evaluation of data quality, reliability and validity of the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index and the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis

Rheumatology

Volumn 49, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2327-2336

  Moe, Rikke H ^a   Garratt, Andrew ^a   Slatkowsky Christensen, Barbara ^a   Maheu, Emmanuel ^b   Mowinckel, Petter ^a   Kvien, Tore K ^a   Kjeken, Ingvild ^a   Hagen, Kåre Birger ^a,c   Uhlig, Till ^a  

^a DIAKONHJEMMET HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index; Functional Index of Hand OA; Hand function; Osteoarthritis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIAN CANADIAN OSTEOARTHRITIS HAND INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEX OF HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; JOINT STIFFNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 78549286005     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq219     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Altman RD. Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1991;27(Suppl.):10-2.
2. Dillon CF, Hirsch R, Rasch EK, Gu Q. Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis in the United States: prevalence and functional impairment estimates from the third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1991-1994. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:12-21.
3. Kalichman L, Hernandez-Molina G. Hand osteoarthritis: an epidemiological perspective. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010; 39:465-76.
4. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Loge JH, Kvien TK. Health-related quality of life in women with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: a comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients, healthy controls, and normative data. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1404-9.
5. Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Slatkowsky-Christensen B et al. Activity limitations and participation restrictions in women with hand osteoarthritis: patients' descriptions and associations between dimensions of functioning. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1633-8.
6. Kvien TK, Fjeld E, Slatkowsky-Christensen B et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel synergistic drug candidate, CRx-102, in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:942-8.
7. Mahendira D, Towheed TE. Systematic review of non-surgical therapies for osteoarthritis of the hand: an update. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009;17:1263-8.
8. Altman RD. Structure-/disease-modifying agents for osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2005;34(Suppl. 2): 3-5.
9. Maheu E, Berenbaum F. Time for new outcome measures in hand osteoarthritis? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2009;5: 136-8.
10. Stamm T, van der GF, Thorstensson C et al. Patient perspective of hand osteoarthritis in relation to concepts covered by instruments measuring functioning: a qualitative European multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68: 1453-60.
11. Maheu E, Altman RD, Bloch DA et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the hand: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Osteoarthr Cartil 2006;14: 303-22.
12. Pham T, van der HD, Altman RD et al. OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthr Cartil 2004;12:389-99.
13. Dziedzic KS, Thomas E, Hay EM. A systematic search and critical review of measures of disability for use in a population survey of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Osteoarthr Cartil 2005;13:1-12.
14. Stamm T, Mathis M, Aletaha D, Kloppenburg M, Machold K, Smolen J. Mapping hand functioning in hand osteoarthritis: comparing self-report instruments with a comprehensive hand function test. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57:1230-7.
15. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B et al. Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthr Cartil 2002;10:855-62.
16. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B et al. Clinimetric properties of the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index: an evaluation of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Osteoarthr Cartil 2002;10:863-9.
17. Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB, Caspard H, Grouin JM. Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1995;62(6 Suppl. 1): 43S-53S.
18. Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35: 1-10.
19. Duruoz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J et al. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1167-72.
20. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602-8.
21. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:619-22.
22. Leeb BF, Sautner J, Andel I, Rintelen B. SACRAH: a score for assessment and quantification of chronic rheumatic affections of the hands. Rheumatology 2003; 42:1173-8.
23. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23: 137-45.
24. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1-74.
25. Wittoek R, Cruyssen BV, Maheu E, Verbruggen G. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Dutch version of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) and a study on its construct validity. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009;17: 607-12.
26. Allen KD, Jordan JM, Renner JB, Kraus VB. Validity, factor structure, and clinical relevance of the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54: 551-6.
27. Allen KD, DeVellis RF, Renner JB, Kraus VB, Jordan JM. Validity and factor structure of the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index in a community-based sample. Osteoarthr Cartil 2007;15:830-6.
28. Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, Bellamy N. Performance of the Norwegian version of AUSCAN-a disease-specific measure of hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2005;13:561-7.
29. Haugen IK, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Lessem J et al. The responsiveness of joint counts, patient-reported measures and proposed composite scores in hand osteoarthritis: analyses from a placebo-controlled trial measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;23:137-45.
30. Dreiser RL, Maheu E, Guillou GB. Sensitivity to change of the functional index for hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2000;8(Suppl. A):S25-8.
31. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33(Suppl. 4): AS264-79.
32. Kvien TK, Kaasa S, Smedstad LM. Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. II. A comparison of the SF-36 with disease-specific measures. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51: 1077-86.
33. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. Br Med J 2002; 15;324:1417.
34. Schmidt RT, Toews JV. Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970;51: 321-7.
35. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:222-6.
36. Ng CL, Ho DD, Chow SP. The Moberg pickup test: results of testing with a standard protocol. J Hand Ther 1999;12: 309-12.
37. Jolliffe IT. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
38. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003;80:99-103.
39. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
40. Sautner J, Andel I, Rintelen B, Leeb BF. A comparison of the modified score for the assessment of chronic rheumatoid affections of the hands and the australian/ canadian osteoarthritis hand index in hand osteoarthritis patients. Int J Rheumatol. Advance Access published February 10, 2009, doi:10.1155/2009/249096.
41. MacDermid JC, Wessel J, Humphrey R, Ross D, Roth JH. Validity of self-report measures of pain and disability for persons who have undergone arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the hand. Osteoarthr Cartil 2007;15: 524-30.