Beyond gentrification: Diversified neighbourhood upgrading in the inner city of Budapest;Za hranici gentrifikace: Různé formy lokální modernizace ve vnitroměstských oblastech Budapešti

Geografie-Sbornik CGS

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 251-274

  Kovács, Zoltán ^a,b   Wiessner, Reinhard ^c   Zischner, Romy ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cities; Gentrification; Post Socialist; Segregation; Social Mix; Urban regeneration

Indexed keywords

GENTRIFICATION; INNER CITY AREA; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NEIGHBORHOOD; SOCIALISM; URBAN RENEWAL;

BUDAPEST; HUNGARY;

EID: 84978898008     PISSN: 12120014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.37040/geografie2015120020251     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. ATKINSON, R., BRIDGE, G., eds. (2005): Gentrification in a Global Context. The new urban colonialism. Routledge, London.
2. BADYINA, A., GOLUBCHIKOV, O. (2005): Gentrification in central Moscow: A market process or a deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regeneration in Ostozhenka, Geografiska Annaler B 87, pp. 113-129.
3. BARTA, G., BELUSZKY, P., CZIRFUSZ, M., Győri, R., KUKELY, G. (2006): Rehabilitating the Brownfield Zones of Budapest. Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Discussion Papers, 51. Pécs.
4. BEAUREGARD, R.A. (1986): The Chaos and Complexity of Gentrification. In: Smith, N., Williams, P. (eds.): Gentrification of the city. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 35-55.
5. BELUSZKY, P., TIMÁR, J. (1992): The changing political system and urban restructuring in Hungary, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 83, No. 5, pp. 380-390.
6. BERÉNYI, B.E., SZABÓ, B. (2009): Housing preferences and the image of inner city neighborhoods in Budapest, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 58, No. 3, pp. 201-214.
7. BERNT, M., HOLM, A. (2005): Exploring the substance and style of gentrification: Berlin’s “Prenzlberg”: In: Atkinson, R., Bridge, G. (eds.): Gentrification in a Global Context. The new urban colonialism, Routledge, London, pp. 106-120.
8. BERNT, M., HOLM, A. (2009): Is it, or is it not? The conceptualisation of gentrification and displacement and its political implications in the case of Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg, CITY Special Issue. Cities for People, Not for Profit, 13, No. 2-3, pp. 312-324.
9. BRECKNER, I. (2010): Gentrifizierung im 21. Jahrhundert, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 17, pp. 27-32.
10. CARPENTER, J., LEES, L. (1995): Gentrification in New York, London and Paris: An International Comparison, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19, No. 2, pp. 286-303.
11. CLAY, P.L. (1979): Neighbourhood Renewal. Middle-Class Resettlement and Incumbent Upgrading in American Neighborhoods. Lexington Books, Lexington.
12. DANGSCHAT, J.S. (1988): Gentrification: Der Wandel innenstadtnaher Wohnviertel. In: Friedrichs, J. (ed.): Soziologische Stadtforschung, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft, No. 29, Opladen, pp. 272-292.
13. DAVIDSON, M., LEES, L. (2005) New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance, Environment and Planning A, 37, No. 7, pp. 1165-1190.
14. DAVIDSON, M., LEES, L. (2010): New-Build Gentrification: Its Histories, Trajectories, and Critical Geographies, Population, Space and Place. Special Issue: New Forms of Gentrification, 16, No. 5, pp. 395-411.
15. DÖRFLER, T. (2010): Gentrification in Prenzlauer Berg? Milieuwandel eines Berliner Sozialraumes seit 1989, Bielefeld.
16. DÖVÉNYI, Z., KOVÁCS, Z. (2006): Budapest: Post-socialist metropolitan periphery between “catching up” and individual development path. European Spatial Research and Policy, 13, No. 2, pp. 23-41.
17. FÖLDI, Zs. (2006): Neighbourhood dynamics in inner-Budapest: a realist approach. Netherlands Geographical Studies No. 350, Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
18. FÖLDI, Zs., VAN WEESEP, J. (2007): Impacts of Globalisation at the Neighbourhood Level in Budapest, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22, No. 1, pp. 33-50.
19. FRIEDRICH, K. (2000): Gentrifizierung. Theoretische Ansätze und Anwendung auf Städte in den neuen Ländern, Geographische Rundschau, 52, No. 7-8, pp. 34-39.
20. FRIEDRICHS, J. (1996): Gentrification. Forschungsstand und Methodologische Probleme. In: Friedrichs, J., Kecskes, R. (eds.): Gentrification. Theorie und Forschungsergebnisse, Leske & Budrich, Opladen, pp. 13-40.
21. FRIEDRICHS, J., HÄUSSERMANN, H. (2001): Die Entwicklung der Städte in den neuen Bundesländern. In: Bertram, H., Kollmorgen, R. (eds): Die Transformation Ostdeutschlands. Berichte zum sozialen und politischen Wandel in den neuen Bundesländern, Leske & Budrich, Opladen, pp. 315-339.
22. GLASS, R. (1964): Aspects of Change. In: Centre for Urban Studies (ed.): London. Aspects of Change. Center for urban studies report, No. 3, pp. 18-19.
23. GLATTER, J. (2007): Gentrification in Ostdeutschland: untersucht am Beispiel der Dresdner Äußeren Neustadt. Dresdner Geographische Beiträge No. 11, Dresden, 233 pp.
24. Górczyńska, M. (2014): Unique or universal? Mechanisms and processes of social change in post-socialist Warsaw, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63, No. 3, pp. 255-270.
25. HAMMEL, D.J. (2009): Gentrification. In: Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (eds): International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 4, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 360--367.
26. HAMNETT, C., RANDOLPH, B. (1986): Tenurial Transformation and the Flat Break-up Market in London: The British Condo Experience. In: Smith, N., Williams, P. (eds.): Gentrification of the City. Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 121-152.
27. HEGEDÜS, J., TOSICS, I. (1991): Gentrification in Eastern Europe: The case of Budapest. In: van Weesep, J., Musterd, S. (eds): Urban Housing for the Better-Off: Gentrification in Europe Stedelijke Netwerken, Utrecht, pp. 124-136.
28. HEGEDÜS, J., TOSICS, I. (1994): Privatisation and Rehabilitation in the Budapest Inner Districts. Housing Studies, 9, No. 1, pp. 39-54.
29. HILL, A., WIEST, K. (2004): Gentrification in ostdeutschen Cityrandgebieten? Theoretische Überlegungen zum empirischen Forschungsstand, Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde, 78 No. 1, pp. 25-39.
30. HOLM, A. (2006): Die Restrukturierung des Raumes. Stadterneuerung der 90er Jahre in Ostberlin: Interessen und Machtverhältnisse. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, 352 pp.
31. KARSTEN, L. (2003): Family Gentrifiers: Challenging the City as a Place Simultaneously to Build a Career and to Raise Children. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2573-2584.
32. KAUKO, T. (2007): An Analysis of Housing Location Attributes in the Inner City of Budapest, Hungary, Using Expert Judgments, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, No. 4, pp. 209-225.
33. KLEE, A. (2001): Der Raumbezug von Lebensstilen in der Stadt: Ein Diskurs über eine schwierige Beziehung mit empirischen Befunden aus der Stadt Nürnberg. L.I.S.-Verlag, Passau, 236 pp.
34. KOK, H., KOVÁCS, Z. (1999): The process of suburbanization in the agglomeration of Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 14, No. 2, pp. 119-141.
35. KOVÁCS, Z. (1998): Ghettoization or gentrification? Post-socialist scenarios for Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13, No. 1, pp. 63-81.
36. KOVÁCS, Z. (2009): Social and economic transformation of historical neighbourhoods in Budapest. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100, No. 4, pp. 399-416.
37. KOVÁCS, Z. (2012): Residential segregation in Budapest before and after transition. In: Maloutas, T., Fujita, K. (eds.): Residential segregation in comparative perspective: making sense of contextual diversity. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 197-216.
38. KOVÁCS, Z., WIESSNER, R. (1999): Stadt-und Wohnungsmarktentwicklung in Budapest. Zur Entwicklung der innerstädtischen Wohnquartiere im Transformationsprozess. Beiträge zur Regionalen Geographie, No. 48, Institut für Länderkunde, Leipzig, 81 pp.
39. KOVÁCS, Z., WIESSNER, R., ZISCHNER, R. (2013): Urban renewal in the inner city of Budapest: Gentrification from a post-socialist perspective. Urban Studies, 50, No. 1, pp. 22-38.
40. Krišjāne, Z., Bērziņš, M. (2014): Intra-urban residential differentiation in the post-Soviet city: the case of Riga, Latvia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63, No. 3, pp. 235-253.
41. LADÁNYI, J. (1993): Patterns of residential segregation and the Gypsy minority in Budapest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17, No. 4, pp. 30-41.
42. LADÁNYI, J. (2002): Residential Segregation among Social and Ethnic Groups in Budapest during the Post-communist Transition. In: Marcuse, P. Van Kempen, R. (eds.): Of States and Cities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 170-182.
43. LEES, L. (1994): Gentrification in London and New York: An Atlantic Gap? Housing Studies 9, No. 2, pp. 199-217.
44. LEES, L. (2003): Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2487-2509.
45. LEES, L., SLATER, T., WYLY, E. (2008): Gentrification. Routledge, New York. 310 pp.
46. LEY, D. (1980): Liberal Ideology and the Postindustrial City. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70, No. 2, pp. 238-258.
47. LEY, D. (1981): Inner-City Revitalization in Canada: a Vancouver case study. Canadian Geographer, 25, No. 2, pp. 124-148.
48. LEY, D. (1996): The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 248 pp.
49. LEY, D. (2003): Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2527-2544.
50. Marzińczak, S. (2012): The evolution of spatial patterns of residential segregation in Central European cities: The Łódź functional urban region from mature socialism to mature post-socialism. Cities, 29, No. 5, pp. 300-309.
51. MURZYN, M. (2006): “Winners” and “Losers” in the Game: the Social Dimension of Urban Regeneration in the Kazimierz Quarter in Krakow. In: Enyedi, G., Kovács, Z. (eds.): Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs, pp. 81-106.
52. MUSTERD, S., OSTENDORF, W., eds. (1998): Urban Segregation and the Welfare State. Routledge, London, 275 pp.
53. MUSTERD, S., ANDERSSON, R. (2005): Housing mix, social, mix and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, No. 6, pp. 761-790.
54. PHILLIPS, M. (1993): Rural Gentrification and the Processes of Class Colonisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, No. 2, pp. 123-140.
55. PHILLIPS, M. (2002): Distant bodies? Rural studies, political-economy and poststructuralism. Sociologia Ruralis, 42, No. 2, pp. 81-105.
56. PHILLIPS, M. (2005): Differential productions of rural gentrification: illustrations from North and South Norfolk. Geoforum, 36, No. 4, pp. 477-494.
57. RÉRAT, P., LEES, L. (2011): Spatial capital, gentrification and mobility: evidence from Swiss core cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, No. 1, pp. 126-142.
58. RÉRAT, P., SÖDERSTRÖM, O., PIGUET, E. (2010): New Forms of Gentrification: Issues and Debates. Population, Space and Place, 16, No. 5, pp. 335-343.
59. ROSE (1996) Economic restructuring and the diversification of gentrification in the 1980s: a view from a marginal metropolis. In: Caulfield, J., Peake, L. (eds.): City Lives and City Forms: Critical Research and Canadian Urbanism. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 131-172.
60. SMITH, N. (1979): Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, No. 4, pp. 538-548.
61. SMITH, N. (1996): The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. Routledge, London, 288 pp.
62. STANDL, H., KRUPICKAITE, D. (2004): Gentrification in Vilnius (Lithuania)-the Example of Uzupis. Europa Regional 12, No. 1, pp. 42-51.
63. SÝKORA, L. (1999): Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal 49, No. 1, pp. 79-89.
64. SÝKORA, L., BOUZAROVSKI, S. (2012): Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49, No. 1, pp. 43-60.
65. TIMÁR, J., VÁRADI, M.M. (2001): The uneven development of suburbanization during transition in Hungary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, No. 4, pp. 349-360.
66. TOSICS, I. (2005): The post-socialist Budapest: the invasion of market forces and the attempts of public leadership. In: Hamilton, F.E.I., Dimitrowska-Andrews, K., Pichler-Milanovic, N. (eds): Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards Globalization. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 248-280.
67. TOSICS, I. (2006): Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest. In: Tsenkova, S., Nedovic-Budic, Z. (eds): The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 131-150.
68. TWICKEL, C. (2010): Gentrifidingsbums oder eine Stadt für alle. Ed. Nautilus, Hamburg, 128 pp.
69. VAN CRIEKINGEN, M., DECROLY, J.-M. (2003) Revisiting the diversity of gentrification: Neighbourhood renewal processes in Brussels and Montreal. Urban Studies, 40, No. 12, pp. 2451-2468.
70. VAN KEMPEN, R., BOLT, G. (2009): Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, No. 4, pp. 457-475.
71. WEISKE, C. (1996): Gentrification und Incumbent Upgrading in Erfurt. In: Friedrichs, J., Kecskes, R. (eds.): Gentrification. Theorie und Forschungsergebnisse. Leske & Budrich, Opladen, pp. 193-226.
72. WIEST, K., ZISCHNER, R. (2006): Aufwertung innerstädtischer Altbaugebiete in den neuen Bundesländern-Prozesse und Entwicklungspfade in Leipzig. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften, 45, No. 1, pp. 99-121.
73. WIESSNER, R. (1987): Wohnungsmodernisierungen-Ein behutsamer Weg der Stadterneuerung? Empirische Fallstudie in Altbauquartieren des Nürnberger Innenstadtrandgebiets. Münchner Geographische Hefte 54, Kallmünz, 278 pp.
74. WIESSNER, R. (1988): Probleme der Stadterneuerung und jüngerer Wohnungsmodernisierung in Altbauquartieren aus sozialgeographischer Sicht. Mit Beispielen aus Nürnberg, Geographische Rundschau, 40, No. 11, pp. 18-25.
75. WIESSNER, R., ZISCHNER, R. (2010): Revitalisierung großstädtischer Wohnquartiere und ihre sozialen Implikationen: Fallbeispiele aus Budapest. In: Kunze, C. (ed.): Wirtschaftlicher Aufholprozess und EU-Integration in Mittel-und Osteuropa-das europäische Wachstumsmodell in der Krise? Leipzig (= Transformation). Leipziger Beiträge zur Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 27/28, pp. 159-177.
76. ZISCHNER, R. (2003): Gentrification in Leipzig-Connewitz? Theoretische Gentrification-Ansätze und deren Gültigkeit in Städten der neuen Bundesländer. Thesis. Institut für Geographie Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, 184 pp.
77. ZISCHNER, R. (2013): Zur Frage der Gentrification in Städten Mittel-und Osteuropas-das Fallbeispiel Budapest. Innerstädtische Wohnquartiere von Budapest im baulichen und sozialen Wandel. Dissertation. Institut für Geographie Universität Leipzig. Leipzig, 262 pp.
78. ZUKIN, S. (1982): Loft living as “historic compromise” in the urban core: the New York experience. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6, No. 2, pp. 256-267.