Structural and functional evaluation of oxygenating keratin/silk fibroin scaffold and initial assessment of their potential for urethral tissue engineering

Biomaterials

Volumn 84, Issue , 2016, Pages 99-110

  Lv, XiangGuo ^a   Li, Zhe ^b   Chen, ShiYan ^b   Xie, MinKai ^a   Huang, JianWen ^a   Peng, XuFeng ^a   Yang, RanXing ^a   Wang, HuaPing ^b   Xu, YueMin ^a,c   Feng, Chao ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED SIXTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b DONGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Shanghai Eastern Urological Reconstruction and Repair Institute   (China)

Author keywords

Keratin; Oxygen generation; Silk fibroin; Tissue Engineering; Urinary tract

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; KERATIN; OXYGEN; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CALCIUM PEROXIDES; ELECTRONIC SCANNING MICROSCOPY; FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION; INITIAL ASSESSMENT; NETWORK STRUCTURES; OXYGEN GENERATION; SILK FIBROIN; URINARY TRACT;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

CALCIUM; GELATIN; KERATIN; OXYGEN; PEROXIDE; SILK FIBROIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CALCIUM PEROXIDE; FIBROIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; DEGRADATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE OXYGENATION; URETHRAL TISSUE; URINARY TRACT; ANIMAL; CELL DEATH; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DOG; DRUG EFFECTS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RABBITS AND HARES; SPECTROMETRY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ULTRASTRUCTURE; URETHRA;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CELL DEATH; CELL PROLIFERATION; DOGS; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; FIBROINS; GELATIN; HUMANS; KERATINS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PEROXIDES; RABBITS; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; URETHRA; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84978886337     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.032     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. [1] Horst, M., Madduri, S., Milleret, V., Sulser, T., Gobet, R., Eberli, D., A bilayered hybrid microfibrous PLGA–acellular matrix scaffold for hollow organ tissue engineering. Biomaterials 34 (2013), 1537–1545.
2. [2] Mangera, A., Chapple, C.R., Tissue engineering in urethral reconstruction–an update. Asian J. Androl. 15 (2013), 89–92.
3. [3] Atala, A., Tissue engineering, stem cells, and cloning for the regeneration of urologic organs. Clin. Plast. Surg. 30 (2003), 649–667.
4. [4] Atala, A., Bioengineered tissues for urogenital repair in children. Pediatr. Res. 63 (2008), 569–575.
5. [5] Langer, R., Tirrell, D.A., Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428 (2004), 487–492.
6. [6] Chen, F., Yoo, J.J., Atala, A., Acellular collagen matrix as a possible “off the shelf” biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology 54 (1999), 407–410.
7. [7] Selim, M., Bullock, A.J., Blackwood, K.A., Chapple, C.R., MacNeil, S., Developing biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering of the urethra. BJU Int. 107 (2011), 296–302.
8. [8] Atala, A., Tissue engineering for the replacement of organ function in the genitourinary system. Am. J. Transpl. 4:Suppl. 6 (2004), 58–73.
9. [9] Xie, M., Xu, Y., Song, L., Wang, J., Lv, X., Zhang, Y., Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa using silk fibroin matrices for urethral reconstruction in a canine model. J. Surg. Res. 188 (2014), 1–7.
10. [10] Xie, M., Song, L., Wang, J., Fan, S., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Evaluation of stretched electrospun silk fibroin matrices seeded with urothelial cells for urethra reconstruction. J. Surg. Res. 184 (2013), 774–781.
11. [11] Folkman, J., Hochberg, M., Self-regulation of growth in three dimensions. J. Exp. Med. 138 (1973), 745–753.
12. [12] Harrison, B.S., Eberli, D., Lee, S.J., Atala, A., Yoo, J.J., Oxygen producing biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 28 (2007), 4628–4634.
13. [13] Srinivasan, B., Kumar, R., Shanmugam, K., Sivagnam, U.T., Reddy, N.P., Sehgal, P.K., Porous keratin scaffold-promising biomaterial for tissue engineering and drug delivery. J. Biomed. Mater Res. B Appl. Biomater. 92 (2010), 5–12.
14. [14] Bhardwaj, N., Sow, W.T., Devi, D., Ng, K.W., Mandal, B.B., Cho, N.-J., Silk fibroin–keratin based 3D scaffolds as a dermal substitute for skin tissue engineering. Integr. Biol. 7 (2015), 53–63.
15. [15] Vasconcelos, A., Freddi, G., Cavaco-Paulo, A., Biodegradable materials based on silk fibroin and keratin. Biomacromolecules 9 (2008), 1299–1305.
16. [16] Laemmli, U.K., Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 (1970), 680–685.
17. [17] Chakravarthy, M., Spangenburg, E., Booth, F., Culture in low levels of oxygen enhances in vitro proliferation potential of satellite cells from old skeletal muscles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 58 (2001), 1150–1158.
18. [18] Fujii, T., Ogiwara, D., Arimoto, M., Convenient procedures for human hair protein films and properties of alkaline phosphatase incorporated in the film. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 27 (2004), 89–93.
19. [19] Yamada, H., Nakao, H., Takasu, Y., Tsubouchi, K., Preparation of undegraded native molecular fibroin solution from silkworm cocoons. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 14 (2001), 41–46.
20. [20] Lu, Q., Hu, X., Wang, X., Kluge, J.A., Lu, S., Cebe, P., et al. Water-insoluble silk films with silk I structure. Acta Biomater. 6 (2010), 1380–1387.
21. [21] DeOliveira, D.B., Trumble, W.R., Sarkar, H.K., Singh, B.R., Secondary structure estimation of proteins using the amide III region of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: application to analyze calcium-binding-induced structural changes in calsequestrin. Appl. Spectrosc. 48 (1994), 1432–1441.
22. [22] Ward, C.L., Corona, B.T., Yoo, J.J., Harrison, B.S., Christ, G.J., Oxygen generating biomaterials preserve skeletal muscle homeostasis under hypoxic and ischemic conditions. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e72485.
23. [23] Simaioforidis, V., de Jonge, P., Sloff, M., Oosterwijk, E., Geutjes, P., Feitz, W.F., Ureteral tissue engineering: where are we and how to proceed?. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 19 (2013), 413–419.
24. [24] Radisic, M., Park, H., Chen, F., Salazar-Lazzaro, J.E., Wang, Y., Dennis, R., et al. Biomimetic approach to cardiac tissue engineering: oxygen carriers and channeled scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 12 (2006), 2077–2091.
25. [25] Nomi, M., Atala, A., Coppi, P.D., Soker, S., Principals of neovascularization for tissue engineering. Mol. Asp. Med. 23 (2002), 463–483.
26. [26] Oh, S.H., Ward, C.L., Atala, A., Yoo, J.J., Harrison, B.S., Oxygen generating scaffolds for enhancing engineered tissue survival. Biomaterials 30 (2009), 757–762.
27. [27] Shim, J.H., Kim, J.Y., Park, M., Park, J., Cho, D.W., Development of a hybrid scaffold with synthetic biomaterials and hydrogel using solid freeform fabrication technology. Biofabrication, 3, 2011, 034102.
28. [28] Fujii, T., Tanaka, T., Ohkawa, K., Biomineralization of calcium phosphate on human hair protein film and formation of a novel hydroxyapatite-protein composite material. J. Biomed. Mater Res. B Appl. Biomater. 91 (2009), 528–536.
29. [29] Nakamura, A., Arimoto, M., Takeuchi, K., Fujii, T., A rapid extraction procedure of human hair proteins and identification of phosphorylated species. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25 (2002), 569–572.
30. [30] Wang, S., Taraballi, F., Tan, L.P., Ng, K.W., Human keratin hydrogels support fibroblast attachment and proliferation in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. 347 (2012), 795–802.
31. [31] Huang, Y., Onyeri, S., Siewe, M., Moshfeghian, A., Madihally, S.V., In vitro characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26 (2005), 7616–7627.
32. [32] Jetbumpenkul, P., Amornsudthiwat, P., Kanokpanont, S., Damrongsakkul, S., Balanced electrostatic blending approach–an alternative to chemical crosslinking of Thai silk fibroin/gelatin scaffold. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 50 (2012), 7–13.
33. [33] Folin, M., Contiero, E., Electrophoretic analysis of human hair keratins. Anthropol. Anz., 1995, 337–348.
34. [34] Hayashi, A., Oh, S.-C., Gelation of gelatin solution. Agric. Biol. Chem. 47 (1983), 1711–1716.
35. [35] Urciuolo, F., Imparato, G., Guaccio, A., Mele, B., Netti, P.A., Novel strategies to engineering biological tissue in vitro. Methods Mol. Biol. 811 (2012), 223–244.
36. [36] Baker, A.M., Hatton, W., Calcium peroxide as a seed coating material for padi rice. Plant Soil 99 (1987), 379–386.
37. [37] Hanh, D.N., Rajbhandari, B.K., Annachhatre, A.P., Bioremediation of sediments from intensive aquaculture shrimp farms by using calcium peroxide as slow oxygen release agent. Environ. Technol. 26 (2005), 581–589.
38. [38] Ding, J., Li, Q., Li, S., Li, F., Zhou, C., Zhou, Y., et al. Ten years' experience for hypospadias repair: combined buccal mucosa graft and local flap for urethral reconstruction. Urol. Int. 93 (2014), 454–459.
39. [39] Arlen, A.M., Powell, C.R., Hoffman, H.T., Kreder, K.J., Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in the treatment of urethral strictures: experience using the two-surgeon technique. ScientificWorldJournal 10 (2010), 74–79.
40. [40] Shokraneh, A., Farhad, A.R., Farhadi, N., Saatchi, M., Hasheminia, S.M., Antibacterial effect of triantibiotic mixture versus calcium hydroxide in combination with active agents against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Dent. Mater J. 33 (2014), 733–738.
41. [41] Siqueira, J.F. Jr., Lopes, H.P., Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int. Endod. J. 32 (1999), 361–369.
42. [42] Mohammadi, Z., Shalavi, S., Is chlorhexidine an ideal vehicle for calcium hydroxide? A microbiologic review. Iran. Endod. J. 7 (2012), 115–122.
43. [43] Dwivedi, S., Wahab, R., Khan, F., Mishra, Y.K., Musarrat, J., Al-Khedhairy, A.A., Reactive oxygen species mediated bacterial biofilm inhibition via zinc oxide nanoparticles and their statistical determination. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e111289.
44. [44] Seino, M., Okada, M., Shibuya, K., Seino, S., Suzuki, S., Takeda, H., et al. Differential contribution of ROS to resveratrol-induced cell death and loss of self-renewal capacity of ovarian cancer stem cells. Anticancer Res. 35 (2015), 85–96.
45. [45] Stark, G., Functional consequences of oxidative membrane damage. J. Membr. Biol. 205 (2005), 1–16.
46. [46] Love, N.R., Chen, Y., Ishibashi, S., Kritsiligkou, P., Lea, R., Koh, Y., et al. Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Nat. Cell Biol. 15 (2013), 222–228.
47. [47] Dorin, R.P., Pohl, H.G., De Filippo, R.E., Yoo, J.J., Atala, A., Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration?. World J. Urol. 26 (2008), 323–326.