Pseudotheory proliferation is damaging the organizational sciences

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1116-1125

  Cucina, Jeffrey M ^a   McDaniel, Michael A ^b  

^a US Customs and Border Protection   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

hypothesis; research methods; scientific method; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978879531     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.2117     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aguinis, H., Bradley, K. J., & Brodersen, A. (2014). Industrial–organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 284–303.
2. Barends, E. G. R., ten Have, S., & Huisman, F. (2012). Learning from other evidence-based practices: The case of medicine. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence based management (pp. 25–42). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.
4. Cucina, J.M., & Hayes, T.L. (2015). Comment on estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. http://comments.sciencemag.org/content/10.1126/science.aac4716.
5. Cucina, J. M., & Moriarty, K. O. (2015). A historical look at theory in industrial-organizational psychology journals. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 53(1), 57–70.
6. th meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA. Available online at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmvbREPK0kE and www.SIOP.org/LivingHistory/Schmidt.pdf.
7. Cucina, J. M., Hayes, T. L., Walmsley, P. T., & Martin, N. R. (2014). It is time to get medieval on the overproduction of pseudotheory: How Bacon (1267) and Alhazen (1021) can save I/O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 356–364.
8. Davis, M. S. (1971). That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.
9. Edwards, J. R., Berry, J., & Kay, V. S. (2014). Bridging the great divide between theoretical and empirical management research. In Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 17696)Vol. 2014, No. 1. Briarcliff Manor: NY: Academy of Management.
10. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1348–1352.
11. Highhouse, S. (2014). Do we need all these words? The need for new publishing norms in I-O psychology. The Industrial Organizational Psychologist, 51(3), 83–84.
12. Highhouse, S. E. (2015). Editorial: Why a new journal? Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 1(1), 1–2.
13. Kacmar, K. M., & Whitfield, J. M. (2000). An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 392–406.
14. Kepes, S., Banks, G. C., McDaniel, M. A., & Whetzel, D. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 624–662.
15. Kepes, S., Bennett, A., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Evidence-based management and the trustworthiness of our cumulative scientific knowledge: Implications for teaching, research, and practice. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13, 446–466.
16. Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 252–268. doi:10.1111/iops.12045.
17. Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). The validity of conscientiousness is overestimated in the prediction of job performance. PloS One, 10(10e0141468).
18. Klein, K. J., & Zedeck, S. (2004). Introduction to the special section on theoretical models and conceptual analyses – theory in applied psychology: Lessons (re)learned. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 931–933.
19. Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2007). Standardized tests predict graduate students' success. Science, 315, 1080–1081.
20. Larsen, K. R., & Bong, C. H. (In press). A tool for addressing construct identity in literature reviews and meta-analyses. MIS Quarterly.
21. Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753–772.
22. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
23. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
24. Locke, E. A., Williams, K. J., & Masuda, A. (2015). The value of persistence. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 52(4), 104–106.
25. Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 537–542.
26. McKinley, W. (2010). Organizational theory development: Displacement of ends? Organization Studies, 31, 47–68.
27. Midbon, M. (2000). ‘A day without yesterday’: Georges Lemaitre & the Big Bang. Commonweal Magazine, 127(6), 18–19.
28. Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943.
29. Owen, A. M., Hampshire, A., Grahn, J. A., Stenton, R., Dajani, S., Burns, A. S., … Ballard, C.G. (2010). Putting brain training to the test. Nature, 465(7299), 775–778.
30. Pfeffer, J. (2007). A modest proposal: How we might change the process and product of managerial research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1334–1345.
31. Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146(3642), 347–353.
32. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
33. Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 693–717.
34. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529–540.
35. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
36. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., & Hirsch, H. R. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 66, 697–798.
37. Spector, P.E. (2015). Induction, deduction abduction: Three legitimate approaches to organizational research. Lecture for the Consortium for the Advancement of Research Methods and Analysis (CARMA).
38. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–384.
39. Tretkoff, E. (2005). This month in physics history: Einstein's quest for a unified theory. American Physical Society News, 14(11), 2.
40. Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. (1953). A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171(4356), 737–738.
41. Watson, J. D. (2001). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York, NY: Touchstone Books.
42. Wootton, D. (2010). Galileo: Watcher of the skies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43. Wright, K. (2004). The master's mistakes: Einstein was often wrong, but even his errors led to deep truths. Discover. Retrieved December 17, 2015 from http://discovermagazine.com/2004/sep/the-masters-mistakes.