Sharing of benefits

Handbook of Global Bioethics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 203-223

  Schroeder, Doris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978820830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_78     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Abutu, A. (2010). Sufferers urge progress on sickle cell drug Nicosan, SciDevNet. Retrieved from http://www.scidev.net/en/news/sufferers-urge-progress-on-sickle-cell-drug-nicosan.html
2. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/convention/text
3. Human Genome Project’s Ethics Committee Statement on Benefit Sharing. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.hugo-international.org/img/benefit_sharing_2000.pdf
4. Kimmelman, J., Weijer, C., & Meslin, E. M. (2009). Helsinki discords: FDA, ethics, and international drug trials. Lancet, 373, 13-14.
5. Mayer, R. (2007).What’s wrong with exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24 (2), 137-150.
6. Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Schroeder, D., & Pogge, T. (2009). Justice and the convention on biological diversity. Ethics and International Affairs, 23, 265-278.
8. Sen, A. (1983). Poverty and famines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Shiva, V. (1991). The violence of the green revolution: Third world agriculture, ecology and politics. London: Zed Books.
10. UNESCO. (2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-humanrights/
11. Wynberg, R., & Chennells, R. (2009). Green diamonds of the South: A review of the San-Hoodia case. In R. Wynberg, D. Schroeder, & R. Chennells (Eds.), Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing-Lessons from the San Hoodia case. Berlin: Springer.