The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: The first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP)

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 264, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 464-471

  Berger, Elizabeth R ^a,d   Clements, Ronald H ^b   Morton, John M ^c   Huffman, Kristopher M ^d   Wolfe, Bruce M ^e   Nguyen, Ninh T ^f   Ko, Clifford Y ^g   Hutter, Matthew M ^h  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP); Process measures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLEEDING; COMORBIDITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT REDUCTION; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CHILD; GASTRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; PYLORUS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PYLORUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84978698160     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001851     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Lanzarini E, et al. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an acceptable primary bariatric procedure in obese patients? Early and 5-year postoperative results. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22: 479-486.
2. Hutter MM, Schirmer B, Jones Dk, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254:410-420; discussion 420-2.
3. Sammour T, Hill AG, Singh P, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage bariatric procedure. Obes Surg. 2010;20:271-275.
4. Ponce J, Nguyen NT, Hutter M, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of surgery procedures in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1199-1200.
5. Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304:435-442.
6. Hutter MM, Jones DB, M. Riley SJ, et al. Best practice updates for weight loss surgery data collection. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:924-928.
7. Campanile FC, Boru CE, Rizzello M, et al. Acute complications after laparoscopic bariatric procedures: update for the general surgeon. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398:669-686.
8. Gentileschi P, D'Ugo S, Benavoli D, et al. Staple-line reinforcement with a thrombin matrix during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22:249-253.
9. Bransen J, Gilissen LP, van Rutte PW, et al. Costs of leaks and bleeding after sleeve gastrectomies. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1767-1771.
10. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1509-1515.
11. Burgos AM, Braghetto I, Csendes A, et al. Gastric leak after laparoscopicsleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1672-1677.
12. Basu NN, Leschinskey D, Heath DI. The use of Seamguard to buttress the suture repair of a staple line leak following laparoscopic gastric bypass for obesity. Obes Surg. 2008;18:896-897.
13. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231-237.
14. Choi YY, Bae J, Hur KY, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it have advantages? A meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1206-1213.
15. ElGeidie A, ElHemaly M, Hamdy E, et al. The effect of residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:997-1003.
16. Ferrer-Marquez M, Belda-Lozano R, Ferrer-Ayza M. Technical controversies in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22:182-187.
17. Bellanger DE, Greenway FL. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 529 cases without a leak: short-term results and technical considerations. Obes Surg. 2011;21:146-150.
18. Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg. 2007;17: 1297-1305.
19. Sethi M, Zagzag J, Patel K, et al. Intraoperative leak testing has no correlation with leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015.
20. Aggarwal S, Sharma AP, Ramaswamy N. Outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without staple line oversewing in morbidly obese patients: a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23: 895-899.
21. Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME. Comparison of permanent and nonpermanent staple line buttressing materials for linear gastric staple lines during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4: 729-734.
22. Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, et al. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19: 166-172.
23. Dapri G, Cadiere GB, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;20:462-467.
24. Gagner M, Buchwald JN. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:713-723.
25. Knapps J, Ghanem M, Clements J, et al. A systematic review of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. JSLS. 2013;17:390-399.
26. Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical Benefit of Gastric Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1133-1141.
27. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Program Manual. [cited 2016 February 23rd]; Available from: https://asmbs.org/about/mbsaqip.
28. Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Shih A, et al. Use of laparoscopy in general surgical operations at academic centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:15-20.
29. Blondet JJ, Morton JM, Nguyen NT. Hospital Accreditation and Bariatric Surgery: Is It Important? Adv Surg. 2015;49:123-129.
30. Blackstone R, Dimick JB, Nguyen NT. Accreditation in metabolic and bariatric surgery: pro versus con. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:198-202.
31. Giannopoulos GA, Tzanakis NE, Rallis GE, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2782-2788.
32. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:1089-1102.
33. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study. Ann Surg. 2008;248:329-336.
34. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peercontrolled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491-507.
35. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217. 336-46 e1.
36. Ingraham AM, Richards KE, Hall BL, et al. Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg. 2010;44:251-267.
37. Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, D'Ugo S, et al. Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2623-2629.
38. Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Flessas J, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2012;22: 42-46.
39. Choi J, Lawson AB, Cai B, et al. A Bayesian latent model with spatiotemporally varying coefficients in low birth weight incidence data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012;21:445-456.
40. Consten EC, Gagner M. Staple-line reinforcement techniques with different buttressing materials used for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: a new strategy to diminish perioperative complications. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13: 59-63.
41. Angrisani L, Cutolo PP, Buchwald JN, et al. Laparoscopic reinforced sleeve gastrectomy: early results and complications. Obes Surg. 2011;21:783-793.
42. Miller KA, Pump A. Use of bioabsorbable staple reinforcement material in gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:417-421; discussion 422.
43. Al Hajj GN, Haddad J. Preventing staple-line leak in sleeve gastrectomy: reinforcement with bovine pericardium vs. oversewing. Obes Surg. 2013;23: 1915-1921.
44. Gayrel X, Loureiro M, Skalli EM, et al. Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Absorbable Staple Line Buttressing in Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients. Obes Surg. 2015.
45. Consten EC, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1360-1366.
46. Bulbuller N, Aslaner A, Oner OZ, et al. Comparison of four different methods in staple line reinforcement during laparascopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6:985-990.
47. Cal P, Deluca L, Jakob T, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 27 versus 39 Fr bougie calibration: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2015.
48. Rosenthal RJ, et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8-19.
49. Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:528-533.
50. Abd Ellatif ME, Abdallah E, Askar W, et al. Long term predictors of success after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 2014;12:504-508.
51. Spivak H. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie. Obes Surg. 1095;24.
52. Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:859-863.