Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 215, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 515.e1-515.e9

  Kawakita, Tetsuya ^a   Reddy, Uma M ^a   Landy, Helain J ^b   Iqbal, Sara N ^a   Huang, Chun Chih ^c,d   Grantz, Katherine L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MEDSTAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Delaware   (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean delivery; indication; obesity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY MASS; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS HEART; GESTATIONAL AGE; HERPES SIMPLEX; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HYPERTENSION; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR STAGE 2; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALPRESENTATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPARA; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NULLIPARA; OBESITY; PLACENTA PREVIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLUTIO PLACENTAE; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNITED STATES; UTERUS DISEASE; VASA PREVIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FETUS HEART RATE; LABOR; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; LABOR PRESENTATION; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; OBESITY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; OVERWEIGHT; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84978427366     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.023     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. 1 National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2011–2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db131.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2016.
2. 2 Hermann, M., Le Ray, C., Blondel, B., et al. The risk of prelabor and intrapartum cesarean delivery among overweight and obese women: possible preventive actions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212 (2015), 241.e1–241.e9.
3. 3 Kominiarek, M.A., VanVeldhuisen, P., Hibbard, J., et al. The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 (2010), 264.e1–264.e7.
4. 4 Osterman, M.J.K., Martin, J.A., Primary cesarean delivery rates, by state: results from the revised birth certificate, 2006-2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep 63 (2014), 1–11.
5. 5 Zhang, J., Bricker, L., Wray, S., et al. Poor uterine contractility in obese women. BJOG 114 (2007), 343–348.
6. 6 Bergholt, T., Lim, L.K., Jørgensen, J.S., Robson, M.S., Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 (2007), 163.e1–163.e5.
7. 7 Dempsey, J.C., Ashiny, Z., Qiu, C.F., Miller, R.S., Sorensen, T.K., Williams, M.A., Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight status and obesity as risk factor for cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 17 (2005), 179–185.
8. 8 Young, T.K., Woodmansee, B., Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a large private practice: the importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 (2002), 312–318.
9. 9 Cedergren, M.I., Non-elective cesarean delivery due to ineffective uterine contractility or due to obstructed labor in relation to maternal body mass index. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 145 (2009), 163–166.
10. 10 Sebire, N.J., Jolly, M., Harris, J.P., et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 25, 2001, 1175.
11. 11 Schneid-Kofman, Sheiner, E., Levy, A., Holcberg, G., Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 90 (2005), 10–15.
12. 12 Robinson, H.E., O'Connell, C.M., Joseph, K.S., McLeod, N.L., Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstet Gynecol 106 (2005), 1357–1364.
13. 13 Zhang, J., Troendle, J., Reddy, U.M., et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 203, 2010, 323.
14. 14 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, A.B., Cahill, A.G., Guise, J.M., Rouse, D.J., Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210 (2014), 179–193.
15. 15 Boyle, A., Reddy, U.M., Landy, H.J., et al. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 122 (2013), 33–40.
16. 16 Nuthalapaty, F.S., Rouse, D.J., Owen, J., The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 103 (2004), 452–456.
17. 17 Carlhäll, S., Källén, K., Blomberg, M., Maternal body mass index and duration of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 171 (2013), 49–53.
18. 18 Kaiser, P.S., Kirby, R.S., Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 97 (2001), 39–43.
19. 19 Crane, S.S., Wojtowycz, M.A., Dye, T.D., Aubry, R.H., Artal, R., Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 89 (1997), 213–216.
20. 20 Zhang, J., Landy, H.J., Branch, D.W., et al., for the Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 116 (2010), 1281–1287.
21. 21 Laughon, S.K., Berghella, V., Reddy, U.M., et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 124 (2014), 57–67.
22. 22 Blomberg, M., Maternal and neonatal outcomes among obese women with weight gain below the new Institute of Medicine recommendations. Obstet Gynecol 117 (2011), 1065–1070.
23. 23 Brost, B.C., Goldenberg, R.L., Mercer, B.M., et al. The preterm prediction study: association of cesarean delivery with increases in maternal weight and body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 (1997), 333–341.