How a prototype argues

Literary and Linguistic Computing

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 405-424

  Galey, Alan ^a   Ruecker, Stan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650403484     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: 14774615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqq021     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ahlberg, C. and Shneiderman, B. (1994). The Alphaslider: A Compact and Rapid Selector: Conference Proceedings on Human factors in Computing Systems: Celebrating Interdependence. Boston, MA: SIGCHI, pp. 365-71.
2. Allen, P. R. (1963). Utopia and European humanism: The function of the prefatory letters and verses, Studies in the Renaissance, 10: 91-107.
3. Booth, W. G., Colomb, G. G., and Williams, J. M. (2008). The Craft of Research. 3rd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bowers, F. (1959). Textual and Literary Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bringhurst, R. (2005). The Elements of Typographic Style. 3rd edn. Vancouver: Hartley & Marks.
6. Carlson, D. (1993). English Humanist Books: Writers and Patrons, Manuscript and Print, 1475-1525. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7. Cerquiglini, B. (1999). In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology, trans. Betsy Wing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. de Certeau, M. (1988). The Writing of History, trans. Tom Conley. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Chow, R. and Ruecker, S. (2006). Transferability-A Wonder on the Ground of Design Research: Proceedings of Wonderground. Lisbon, Portugal: The Design Research Society, pp. 1-6.
10. Darnton, R. (1984). Philosophers Trim the Tree of Knowledge: The Epistemological Strategy of the Encyclopédie. In The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History. New York: Basic Books, pp. 191-214.
11. DeRose, S. J., Durand, D. G., Mylonas, E. and Renear, A. H. (1990). What Is Text, Really? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1(2): 3-26.
12. Dunne, A. (2005). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fitzpatrick, K. (2009). Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: NYU Press. [Forthcoming; accessed in open peer review version at http://mediacommons.future-ofthebook.org/mcpress/plannedobsolescence/ (accessed 19 August 2010)].
14. Galey, A., Cunningham, R., Nelson, B., Siemens, R., and Werstine, P. and the INKE Team. (forthcoming). Beyond Remediation: The Role of Textual Studies in Implementing New Knowledge Environments. In Nelson, B. and Terras, M. (eds), Digitizing Material Culture, from Antiquity to 1700. Toronto & Tempe, AZ: Iter/Arizona Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, n.p.
15. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003). Designing Design: Ambiguity as a Resource for Design: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Ft Lauderdale, FL: ACM Press, 2003.
16. Giacometti, A., Ruecker, S., Craig, I., Derksen, G., and Radzikowska, M. Introducing the Ripper Interface for Text Collections. Paper presented at the Canadian Symposium on Text Analysi (CaSTA) Conference: New Directions in Text Analysis. A Joint Humanities Computing, Computer Science Conference at University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, October 16-18, 2008.
17. Grafton, A. (2009). Worlds Made by Words: Scholarship and Community in the Modern West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Gibson, R. W. (1961). St. Thomas More: A Preliminary Bibliography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Haraway, D. J. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Harris, R. L. (2000). Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hayles, N. K. (2005). My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Helmer-Poggenpohl, S. (1999). Design Moves: Approximating a Desired Future with Users: Conference Proceedings on Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections. Edmonton, AB: Department of Art and Design, University of Alberta.
23. Hinman, C. (1963). The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.
24. Howsam, L. (2006). Old Books and New Histories: An Orientation to Studies in Books and Print Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
25. Jardine, L. (1993). Erasmus, Man of Letters: The Construction of Charisma in Print. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Johns, A. (1998). The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Kinney, A. F. (2005). Utopia's First Readers. In Honselaars, T. and Kinney, A. (eds), Challenging Humanism: Essays in Honor of Dominic Baker-Smith. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press, pp. 23-53.
28. Kronick, D. A. (2004). 'Devant le Deluge' and Other Essays on Early Modern Scientific Communication. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
29. Leslie, M. (1998). Renaissance Utopias and the Problem of History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. Manovich, L. (2007). Q&A Session at the Digital Humanities (DH) 2007 Conference. Urbana-Champaign, IL, June 2007.
31. Massai, S. (2007). Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mayr, E. (1976). Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. McCarty, W. (2008). What's Going On? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3): 253-61.
34. McGann, J. J. (1983). A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
35. McGann, J. J. (1991). The Textual Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. McGann, J. J. (2001). Radiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. McKenzie, D. F. (1999). Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
38. McKenzie, D. F. (2002). Typography and Meaning: The Case of William Congreve. In McDonald, P. D. and Suarez, M. (eds), Making Meaning: 'Printers of the Mind' and Other Essays. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 198-236.
39. Moxon, J. (1683). Mechanick Exercises: Or, the Doctrine of Handy-works Applied to the Art of Printing. London.
40. Mowat, B. (1988). The Form of Hamlet's Fortunes, Renaissance Drama [new ser.], 19: 97-126.
41. Paley, W. B. (2002). TextArc: An alternate way to view a text. http://www.textarc.org/ (accessed 19 August 2010).
42. Paredes-Olea, M., Ruecker, S., Fiorentino, C., and Forbes, F. (2008). Using an Affordance Strength Approach to Study the Possible Redeployment of Designs for Decision Support Visualization. Paper Presented at the 9th Advances in Qualitative Methods Conference 2008, Banff, AB, October 2008.
43. Posavec, S. (2007). Literary Organism. http://www.itsbeenreal.co.uk/ (accessed 19 December 2010).
44. Rand, P. (1985). Paul Rand: A Designer's Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45. Ratto, M. (2009). Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. Paper Presented at Hybrid Design Practices workshop, Ubicomp 2009, Orlando, FL.
46. Ratto, M. and Hockema, S. (2009). Flwr Pwr: Tending the Walled Garden. In Dekker, A. and Wolfsberger, A. (eds), Walled Garden. The Netherlands: Virtueel Platform: http://www.virtueelplatform.nl/en/#2780.
47. Renear, A. (1997). Out of Praxis: Three (Meta)Theories of Textuality. In Sutherland, K. (ed.), Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 107-26.
48. Roberts-Smith, J., Gabriele, S., Ruecker, S., Sinclair, S., Bouchard, M., DeSouza-Coelho, S., Kong, A., Lam, D., and Rodriguez, R. (2009). The Text and the Line of Action: Re-conceiving Watching the Script: Proceedings of the INKE 2009: Birds of a Feather Conference. Victoria, BC, October 2009.
49. Robinson, P. (2009). What Text Really Is Not, and Why Editors Have to Learn to Swim. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24(1): 41-52.
50. Rockwell, G. What Is Text Analysis, Really? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(2): 209-19.
51. Ruecker, S. (2006). Proposing an Affordance Strength Model to Study New Interface Tools. Paper Presented at the Digital Humanities 2006 Conference, at the Sorbonne, Paris, July 2006.
52. Ruecker, S., Sinclair, S., and Radzikowska, M. (2007). Confidence, Visual Research and the Aesthetic Function. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 2(1): http://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/ (accessed 19 August 2010).
53. Sengers, P. and Gaver, W. (2006). Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, University Park, PA: ACM, pp. 99-108.
54. Siemens, R., Warwick, C., Cunningham, R., Dobson, T., Galey, A., Ruecker, S., Schreibman, S., and the INKE Team. (2009). Codex Ultor: Toward a Conceptual and Theoretical Foundation for New Research on Books and Knowledge Environments. Spec. issue of Digital Studies/Le champ numérique, 1(2), ed. John Bonnet and Kevin Kee, http://www.digitalstudies.org/ojs/index.php/digital_studies/article/view/177/220 (accessed 19 August 2010).
55. Conjointly published in French as Codex Ultor: Vers une base conceptuelle et théorique pour la nouvelle recherche sur les livres et les environnements documentaires, Mémoires du livre/Studies in Book Culture, 1(1) (2009), http://www.erudit.org/revue/memoires/2009/v1/n1/ (accessed 19 August 2010).
56. Sinclair, S., Bradley, J., Ramsay, S., Rockwell, G., Siemens, R., and Guédon, J.-C. (2003). Peer Review of Humanities Computing Software. Panel at The Association for Computers and the Humanities/The Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing (ALLC/ACH): The 2003 Joint International Conference. Athens, Georgia. May 29-June 2, 2008. Draft articles online at http://tada.mcmaster.ca/Main/PeerReviewCluster (accessed 19 August 2010).
57. Stoddard, R. (1987). Morphology and the Book from an American Perspective. Printing History, 9(17): 2-14.
58. Tischendorf, C. (1867). When Were Our Gospels Written? An Argument by Constantine Tischendorf with a Narrative of the Discovery of the Sinaitic Manuscript. 2nd edn. London: The Religious Tract Society.
59. Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
60. Unsworth, J. (2000). Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common, and How Might Our Tools Reflect This? http://www3.isrl.illinois.edu/AdvMT_SY.-1.C24unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html (accessed 19 August 2010).
61. Vallée, J.-F. (2004). The Fellowship of the Book: Printed Voices and Written Friendships in More's Utopia.In Heitsch, D. and Vallée, J.-F. (eds), Printed Voices: The Renaissance Culture of Dialogue. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 42-62.
62. Werstine, P. (1988). The Textual Mystery of Hamlet. Shakespeare Quarterly, 39(1): 1-26.
63. Wooden, W. W. and Wall, J. N. (1985). Thomas More and the Painter's Eye: Visual Perspective and Artistic Purpose in More's Utopia. Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 15: 231-63.
64. Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1): 121-36.