A high-performance and fouling resistant thin-film composite membrane prepared via coating TiO2 nanoparticles by sol-gel-derived spray method for PRO applications

Desalination

Volumn 397, Issue , 2016, Pages 157-164

  Kim, Jungchan ^a   Suh, Dongwoo ^a   Kim, Choonsoo ^a   Baek, Youngbin ^a,c   Lee, Byeongho ^a   Kim, Hee Joong ^a   Lee, Jong Chan ^a   Yoon, Jeyong ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Fouling resistance; Performance enhancement; Pressure retarded osmosis; Surface modification; TiO2 nanoparticle coating; TiO2 sol gel derived spray coating

Indexed keywords

COATING TECHNIQUES; COATINGS; COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; FILM PREPARATION; FOULING; NANOPARTICLES; OSMOSIS; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; SOL-GEL PROCESS; SOL-GELS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

FOULING RESISTANCE; NANOPARTICLE COATINGS; PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS; PRESSURE-RETARDED OSMOSIS; SPRAY COATING;

MEMBRANES;

COATING; FOULING; MEMBRANE; NANOPARTICLE; OSMOSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TITANIUM;

EID: 84978280613     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. [1] International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook, OECD/IEA, Paris, 2011 Available from: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/weo-2011.html (accessed 24.02.16).
2. [2] BP Statistical Review of World Energy, British Petroleum Company, 2015 Available from: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-full-report.pdf (accessed 24.02.16).
3. [3] Helfer, F., Lemckert, C., Anissimov, Y.G., Osmotic power with pressure retarded osmosis: theory, performance and trends – a review. J. Membr. Sci. 453 (2014), 337–358.
4. [4] Kaminski, M.D., Lee, S.D., Magnuson, M., Wide-area decontamination in an urban environment after radiological dispersion: a review and perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 305 (2016), 67–86.
5. [5] Bomanji, J.B., Novruzov, F., Vinjamuri, S., Radiation accidents and their management: emphasis on the role of nuclear medicine professionals. Nucl. Med. Commun. 35 (2014), 995–1002.
6. [6] Ramon, G.Z., Feinberg, B.J., Hoek, E.M., Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power. Energy Environ. Sci. 4 (2011), 4423–4434.
7. [7] Logan, B.E., Elimelech, M., Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 488 (2012), 313–319.
8. [8] Yip, N.Y., Tiraferri, A., Phillip, W.A., Schiffman, J.D., Hoover, L.A., Kim, Y.C., Elimelech, M., Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011), 4360–4369.
9. [9] Petersen, R.J., Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 83 (1993), 81–150.
10. [10] Stillman, D., Krupp, L., La, Y.-H., Mesh-reinforced thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis applications: the structure–performance relationship. J. Membr. Sci. 468 (2014), 308–316.
11. [11] Zhang, S., Fu, F., Chung, T.-S., Substrate modifications and alcohol treatment on thin film composite membranes for osmotic power. Chem. Eng. Sci. 87 (2013), 40–50.
12. [12] McCutcheon, J.R., Elimelech, M., Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 318 (2008), 458–466.
13. [13] She, Q., Wang, R., Fane, A.G., Tang, C.Y., Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 499 (2016), 201–233.
14. [14] Kim, D.I., Kim, J., Shon, H.K., Hong, S., Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) for integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation: energy consumption and fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 483 (2015), 34–41.
15. [15] Li, X., Cai, T., Chung, T.S., Anti-fouling behavior of hyperbranched polyglycerol-grafted poly(ether sulfone) hollow fiber membranes for osmotic power generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014), 9898–9907.
16. [16] Arena, J.T., McCloskey, B., Freeman, B.D., McCutcheon, J.R., Surface modification of thin film composite membrane support layers with polydopamine: enabling use of reverse osmosis membranes in pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 375 (2011), 55–62.
17. [17] Bui, N.N., McCutcheon, J.R., Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 1761–1769.
18. [18] Bui, N.N., McCutcheon, J.R., Nanofiber supported thin-film composite membrane for pressure-retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2014), 4129–4136.
19. [19] Chou, S., Wang, R., Fane, A.G., Robust and high performance hollow fiber membranes for energy harvesting from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 448 (2013), 44–54.
20. [20] Hoover, L.A., Schiffman, J.D., Elimelech, M., Nanofibers in thin-film composite membrane support layers: enabling expanded application of forward and pressure retarded osmosis. Desalination 308 (2013), 73–81.
21. [21] Patel, R., Chi, W.S., Ahn, S.H., Park, C.H., Lee, H.-K., Kim, J.H., Synthesis of poly(vinyl chloride)-g-poly(3-sulfopropyl methacrylate) graft copolymers and their use in pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 247 (2014), 1–8.
22. [22] Nguyen, A., Azari, S., Zou, L., Coating zwitterionic amino acid l-DOPA to increase fouling resistance of forward osmosis membrane. Desalination 312 (2013), 82–87.
23. 2 nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011), 2904–2939.
24. 2 hollow nanoparticles decorated with Ag nanoparticles: enhanced visible light absorption and improved light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014), 4439–4446.
25. 2-core/Sn-shell nanotube arrays based on monolithic negative electrode for Li-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 130 (2014), 600–605.
26. 2 nanotubes and its effect on Rhodamine B photocatalytic oxidation. Environ. Eng. Res. 20 (2015), 329–335.
27. 2/activated carbon. Environ. Eng. Res. 20 (2015), 181–189.
28. 2 nanotube array as an oxidant generating novel anode material fabricated by simple cathodic polarization. Electrochim. Acta 141 (2014), 113–119.
29. 2 nanoparticles. Desalination 219 (2008), 48–56.
30. 2 nanocomposite substrate for water desalination. Chem. Eng. J. 237 (2014), 70–80.
31. [31] Emadzadeh, D., Lau, W.J., Rahbari-Sisakht, M., Daneshfar, A., Ghanbari, M., Mayahi, A., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A.F., A novel thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane with superior anti-organic fouling affinity for water desalination. Desalination 368 (2015), 106–113.
32. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001), 2388–2394.
33. 2 particles under UV irradiation. J. Membr. Sci. 303 (2007), 221–233.
34. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane as an approach to solve biofouling problem. J. Membr. Sci. 211 (2003), 157–165.
35. 2 films by ethanolamine-alkoxide method. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990), 267–272.
36. 2 thin films prepared by sol–gel dip coating. Mater. Chem. Phys. 85 (2004), 52–57.
37. 2 thin films prepared by sol–gel dip coating. Mater. Lett. 57 (2002), 355–360.
38. 2 sol–gel spray method for carbon electrode fabrication to enhance desalination efficiency of capacitive deionization. Desalination 342 (2014), 70–74.
39. [39] Ren, J., McCutcheon, J.R., A new commercial thin film composite membrane for forward osmosis. Desalination 343 (2014), 187–193.
40. 4 photovoltaic absorber thin films. Mater. Res. Bull. 50 (2014), 165–171.
41. [41] Yoon, H., Baek, Y., Yu, J., Yoon, J., Biofouling occurrence process and its control in the forward osmosis. Desalination 325 (2013), 30–36.
42. III complex coated membranes having multifunctional properties prepared by a one-step fast assembly. Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 2, 2015.
43. [43] Kim, D.-G., Kang, H., Han, S., Lee, J.-C., The increase of antifouling properties of ultrafiltration membrane coated by star-shaped polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012), 8654–8661.
44. 2-films on gold/mica. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 358 (1997), 96–100.
45. 2. J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007), 15228–15235.
46. [46] Hopfengärtner, G., Borgmann, D., Rademacher, I., Wedler, G., Hums, E., Spitznagel, G.W., XPS studies of oxidic model catalysts: internal standards and oxidation numbers. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 63 (1993), 91–116.
47. [47] Jouan, P.Y., Peignon, M.C., Cardinaud, C., Lempérière, G., Characterisation of TiN coatings and of the TiN/Si interface by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 68 (1993), 595–603.
48. [48] Gardner, S.D., Singamsetty, C.S.K., Booth, G.L., He, G.-R., Pittman, C.U. Jr., Surface characterization of carbon fibers using angle-resolved XPS and ISS. Carbon 33 (1995), 587–595.
49. 2 laser. Surf. Coat. Technol. 153 (2002), 210–216.
50. [50] Ren, L., Yang, F., Wang, C., Li, Y., Liu, H., Tu, Z., Zhang, L., Liu, Z., Gao, J., Xu, C., Plasma synthesis of oxidized graphene foam supporting Pd nanoparticles as a new catalyst for one-pot synthesis of dibenzyls. RSC Adv. 4 (2014), 63048–63054.
51. [51] Laiho, T., Leiro, J.A., Heinonen, M.H., Mattila, S.S., Lukkari, J., Photoelectron spectroscopy study of irradiation damage and metal–sulfur bonds of thiol on silver and copper surfaces. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 142 (2005), 105–112.
52. [52] Sham, T.-K., Chemical Applications of Synchrotron Radiation. 2002, World Scientific.
53. [53] Zhang, W., Shi, J., Wang, X., Jiang, Z., Song, X., Ai, Q., Conferring an adhesion layer with mineralization-inducing capabilities for preparing organic–inorganic hybrid microcapsules. J. Mater. Chem. B 2 (2014), 1371–1378.
54. 2 nanoparticle nanocomposite films with high transparency and efficient photodegradability. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 92 (2007), 1255–1264.
55. [55] Parfitt, G., The surface of titanium dioxide. Prog. Surf. Membr. Sci. 11 (1976), 181–226.
56. [56] Hanawa, T., Kon, M., Doi, H., Ukai, H., Murakami, K., Hamanaka, H., Asaoka, K., Amount of hydroxyl radical on calcium-ion-implanted titanium and point of zero charge of constituent oxide of the surface-modified layer. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 9 (1998), 89–92.
57. [57] Suttiponparnit, K., Jiang, J., Sahu, M., Suvachittanont, S., Charinpanitkul, T., Biswas, P., Role of surface area, primary particle size, and crystal phase on titanium dioxide nanoparticle dispersion properties. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 (2011), 1–8.
58. [58] Kim, I.-C., Lee, K.-H., Dyeing process wastewater treatment using fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 192 (2006), 246–251.
59. [59] Szymczyk, A., Fievet, P., Ion transport through nanofiltration membranes: the steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. Desalination 200 (2006), 122–124.
60. [60] Rana, D., Matsuura, T., Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem. Rev. 110 (2010), 2448–2471.
61. [61] Cho, J., Amy, G., Pellegrino, J., Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes. Desalination 127 (2000), 283–298.
62. 2 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 249 (2005), 76–84.