A novel thin film composite forward osmosis membrane prepared from PSf-TiO2 nanocomposite substrate for water desalination

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 237, Issue , 2014, Pages 70-80

  Emadzadeh, D ^a   Lau, W J ^a   Matsuura, T ^b   Rahbari Sisakht, M ^a   Ismail, A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Forward osmosis; Substrate; Thin film nanocomposite membrane; TiO2 nanoparticles; Water desalination

Indexed keywords

CROSS-SECTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; FORWARD OSMOSIS; FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; INTERNAL CONCENTRATION POLARIZATIONS (ICP); THIN-FILM NANOCOMPOSITES; TIO; WATER DESALINATION;

DESALINATION; FACINGS; FILM PREPARATION; HYDROPHILICITY; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOPARTICLES; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; POROSITY; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; THIN FILMS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WATER FILTRATION;

LOADING;

EID: 84886603661     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.081     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Razmjou A., Simon G.P., Wang H. Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent. Chemical Engineering Journal 2013, 215-216:913-920.
2. Charcosset C. A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination. Desalination 2009, 245:214-231.
3. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 281:70-87.
4. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 396:1-21.
5. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 365:34-39.
6. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 207:370-382.
7. Ma N., Wei J., Liao R., Tang C.Y. Zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes: towards enhanced performance for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 405-406:149-157.
8. Liu X., Qi S., Li Y., Yang L., Cao B., Tang C.Y. Synthesis and characterization of novel antibacterial silver nanocomposite nanofiltration and forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly. Water Research 2013, 47:3071-3092.
9. Wei J., Liu X., Qiu C., Wang R., Tang C.Y. Influence of monomer concentrations on the performance of polyamide-based thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 381:110-117.
10. Lin A., Shao S., Li H., Yang D., Kong Y. Preparation and characterization of a new negatively charged polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for treating oilfield wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 371:286-292.
11. Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 367:340-352.
12. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 284:237-247.
13. Han G., Zhang S., Li X., Widjojo N., Chung T.-S. Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on polydopamine modified polysulfone substrates with enhancements in both water flux and salt rejection. Chemical Engineering Science 2012, 80:219-231.
14. Arthanareeswaran G., Thanikaivelan P. Fabrication of cellulose acetate-zirconia hybrid membranes for ultrafiltration applications: performance, structure and fouling analysis. Separation and Purification Technology 2010, 74:230-235.
15. 2) ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Desalination 2011, 273:85-92.
16. 2 nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane for high temperature condensed water treatment. Desalination 2012, 299:35-43.
17. Mills A., Le Hunte S. An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 1997, 108:1-35.
18. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane as an approach to solve biofouling problem. Journal of Membrane Science 2003, 211:157-165.
19. 2 deposited nano-composite PVDF/SPES membranes. Desalination 2012, 285:31-38.
20. Loeb S., Mehta G.D. A two-coefficient water transport equation for pressure-retarded osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 1978, 4:351-362.
21. Mehta G.D., Loeb S. Internal polarization in the porous substructure of a semipermeable membrane under pressure-retarded osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 1978, 4:261-265.
22. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 129:243-249.
23. Masselin I., Durand-Bourlier L., Laine J.-M., Sizaret P.-Y., Chasseray X., Lemordant D. Membrane characterization using microscopic image analysis. Journal of Membrane science 2001, 186:85-96.
24. 2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Applied Surface Science 2009, 255:4725-4732.
25. 2 fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 288:231-238.
26. Misdan N., Lau W.J., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T. Formation of thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: Effect of polysulfone substrate characteristics. Desalination 2013, 329:9-18.
27. 2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 378:73-84.
28. 2 hybrid membranes by sol-gel process. Polymer 2006, 47:2683-2688.
29. 2 composite membranes. Applied Surface Science 2008, 254:7080-7086.
30. 2 hybrid photocatalytic membrane with hierarchical porosity: fabrication, characterizations and performances. Chemical Engineering Journal 2013, 228:1030-1039.
31. 2 nanoparticles surface-modified by both carboxylic acid and amine: dispersibility and stabilization in organic solvents. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2008, 317:543-550.
32. 2 nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2006, 296:71-78.
33. Tarboush B.J.A., Rana D., Matsuura T., Arafat H., Narbaitz R. Preparation of thin-film-composite polyamide membranes for desalination using novel hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 325:166-175.
34. Bui N.-N., Lind M.L., Hoek E., McCutcheon J.R. Electrospun nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 385:10-19.
35. Singh P.S., Joshi S., Trivedi J., Devmurari C., Rao A.P., Ghosh P. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 278:19-25.
36. Wei X., Kong X., Sun C., Chen J. Characterization and application of a thin-film composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membrane for dye desalination and concentration. Chemical Engineering Journal 2013, 223:172-182.
37. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.-N., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: II. Membrane physiochemical properties and their dependence on polyamide and coating layers. Desalination 2009, 242:168-182.
38. Tang C.Y., Fu Q.S., Criddle C.S., Leckie J.O. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater. Environmental Science and Technology 2007, 41:2008-2014.
39. Wang K.Y., Chung T.S., Amy G. Developing thin-film-composite forward osmosis membranes on the PES/SPSf substrate through interfacial polymerization. AIChE Journal 2012, 58:770-781.
40. Rana D., Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chemical Reviews 2010, 110:2448.
41. Hirose M., Ito H., Kamiyama Y. Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1996, 121:209-215.
42. Xiao D., Tang C.Y., Zhang J., Lay W.C., Wang R., Fane A.G. Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: Implications for FO membrane selection and system operation. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 366:314-324.
43. Wei J., Qiu C., Tang C.Y., Wang R., Fane A.G. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 372:292-302.
44. Lay W.C., Zhang J., Tang C., Wang R., Liu Y., Fane A.G. Factors affecting flux performance of forward osmosis systems. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 394:151-168.
45. Wang R., Shi L., Tang C.Y., Chou S., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 355:158-167.
46. Chou S., Shi L., Wang R., Tang C.Y., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 2010, 261:365-372.
47. Setiawan L., Wang R., Li K., Fane A.G. Fabrication of novel poly (amide-imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 369:196-205.
48. Widjojo N., Chung T.-S., Weber M., Maletzko C., Warzelhan V. A sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (SPPSU) as the supporting substrate in thin film composite (TFC) membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis (FO). Chemical Engineering Journal 2013, 220:15-23.