Predatory Journals in the Criminal Justices Sciences: Getting our Cite on the Target

Journal of Criminal Justice Education

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 174-191

  Noga Styron, Krystal E ^a   Olivero, J Michael ^a   Britto, Sarah ^b  

^a CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978152234     PISSN: 10511253     EISSN: 17459117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511253.2016.1195421     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allen, B. M., (2008). All hype or real change:Has the digital revolution changed scholarly communication? Journal of Library Administration, 48, 59–68.10.1080/01930820802029391
2. Beall, J. (2014, February 25). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers (2nd ed.). Retrieved from Scholarly Open Access:http://scholarlyoa.com
3. Beall, J., (2015a, January 1). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers (3rd ed.). Retrieved from Scholarly Open Access:http://scholarlyoa.com
4. Beall, J. (2015b, November 10). List of stand alone journals. Retrieved from Scholarly Open Access:http://scholarlyoa.com
5. Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s list:Better understanding predatory publishers. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/76/3/132.full.pdf+htm
6. Bergman, S., (2006). The scholarly communication movement:Highlights and recent developments. Collection Building, 25, 108–128.10.1108/01604950610705989
7. Boissy, R., & Schatz, B., (2011). Scholarly communications from the publisher perspective. Journal of Library Administration, 51, 476–484. doi:10.1080/01930826.2011.589355
8. Brienza, C., (2012). Opening the wrong gate? The academic spring and scholarly publishing in the humanities and social sciences. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28, 159–171. doi:10.1007/s12109-012-9272-5
9. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2015, March 1). Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from www.opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess/
10. Butler, D., (2013). Investigating journals:The dark side of publishing. Nature, 495, 433–435.
11. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2016a). Code of conduct for journal publishers. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20conduct%20for%20publishers%20FINAL_1_0.pdf
12. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2016b). Principles of transparency and best practices in scholarly publishing. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles%20of%20Transparency%20and%20Best%20Practice%20in%20Scholarly%20Publishing.pdf
13. Crawford, W. (2016, January 29) ‘Trust me’:The other problem with 87% of Beall’s lists. Retrieved from http://walt.lishost.org/2016/01/trust-me-the-other-problem-with-87-of-bealls-lists/
14. Curtis, J. W., & Thornton, S., (2013). Here’s the news:The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 2012–2013. Academe, 99, 4–19.
15. Dadkhah, M., Elias, N., Jazi, M. D., Christova-Bagdassarian, V., & Abu-Elteen, K. H., (2015). A new challenge in the academic world:Earning real money and eminence by paper publishing. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 8, 73–75.
16. Directory of Open Access Journals. (2016). Retrieved from https://doaj.org/
17. Djuric, D., (2014). Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing:The Romanian connection. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 183–202.
18. Drake, M. A., (2007). Scholarly communication in turmoil. (cover story). Information Today, 24(2), 1–19.
19. Evans, G., & Saponaro, M., (2012). Collection management basics (6th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA:Libraries Unlimited.
20. Free-for-all; Academic publishing. (2013, May 04). The Economist, 407, 79. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21577035-open-access-scientific-publishing-gaining-ground-free-all
21. Gabbidon, S. L., Higgins, G. E., & Martin, F., (2011). Moving through the faculty ranks:An exploratory study on the perceived importance of book publishing and publishing in peer-reviewed journals in criminology/criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 165–180.10.1080/10511253.2010.517767
22. Hendricks, A., (2010). Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians. Library Hi Tech, 28, 470–477. doi:10.1108/07378831011076701
23. Hendrix, J., (2010). Checking out the future. ALA Office for Information Technology Policy (Policy Brief) 2(February), 1–24.
24. Henry, G., (2003). Online publishing in the 21st century. D-Lib Magazine, 9(10), 1–11. doi:10.1045/october2003-henry
25. Johnson, L., Heller, L., Kirstein, A., Mumenthaler, R., Becker, S., & Cummins, M., (2014). NMC horizon report:2014 library edition. Austin, TX:New Media Consortium.
26. Jump, P. (2012, August 2). Research intelligence–‘predators’ who lurk in plain cite. The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 22.
27. Jump, P. (2014, May 5). Lecturer wins battle to erase name from board of ‘predatory’ journal. Times Higher Education. p. 9.
28. Knoll, J. L., (2014). Open access journals and forensic publishing. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42, 15–21.
29. Kolata, G. (2013, April 7). Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://art.yale.edu/file_columns/0000/2306/kolata.pdf
30. Lariviere, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P., (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. Plos/One, 10(6), 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
31. Moghaddam, G. G., (2005). How electronic publishing changes the production and distribution of scholarly journals. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 42, 459–464.
32. Moghaddam, G. G., & Urs, S. R., (2006). Electronic scholarly journals:A review of technical issues in digital environment. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 44, 235–245.
33. Noga, K. E., (2007). Securitizing copyrights:An answer to the Sonny Bono copyright term extension act. Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, IX, 1–73.
34. O’Doherty, S., & Boissy, B., (2009). Is there a future for the traditional subscription-based journal? The Serials Librarian, 56, 155–162. doi:10.1080/03615260802678582
35. OMICS Publishing Group. (2015, March 1). Open access publishing. Retrieved from http://www.omicsonline.org/open-access-publication.php
36. Pinfield, S., (2013). Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis? Learned Publishing, 26, 85–88. doi:10.1087/20130204
37. Robinson, M., & Scherlen, A., (2009). Publishing in criminology and criminal justice:Assessing journal editors’ awareness and acceptance of open acces. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 4, 98–117.
38. Rubin, R., (2010). Foundations of library and information science. New York, NY:Neil Schuman.
39. Shaw, V., (2009). Scholarly publishing:Reforms for user friendliness and system efficiency. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40, 241–262. doi:10.3138/jsp.40.3.241
40. Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail response rates:A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
41. Spears T. (2014, August 22). Bogus research printed for a price; Predatory journal. National Post, p. A6.
42. Stratford, M. (2012, March 4). ‘Predatory’ online journals lure scholars who are eager to publish. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Predatory-Online-Journals/131047/
43. Suber, P. (2004). A very brief introduction to open access. Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/brief.htm
44. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L., (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings, 61, 5–32. doi:10.1108/00012530910932267
45. Theodorou, R., (2010). OA repositories:The researchers’ point of view. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 13(3). doi:10.3998/3336451.0013.304
46. Weibel, S. L., (2001). Scholarly publishing on the world wide web. Journal of Library Administration, 34, 73–80.10.1300/J111v34n01_11
47. Wilson, K., (2013). Librarian vs. (open access) predator:An interview with Jeffrey Beall. Serials Review, 39, 125–128.10.1080/00987913.2013.10765505
48. Young, P. (2015, May 19). A response to Jeffrey Beall’s critique of open access. Retrieved from https://blogs.lt.vt.edu/openvt/2015/05/19/a-response-to-jeffrey-bealls-critique-of-open-access/