Erratum: Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2016) 113 (E3995-E4004) DOI:10.1073/pnas.1519061113);Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 28, 2016, Pages E3995-E4004

  García Ruiz, Adriana ^a,b   Cole, John B ^b   VanRaden, Paul M ^b   Wiggans, George R ^b   Ruiz López, Felipe J ^a   Van Tassell, Curtis P ^b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES   (Mexico)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dairy cattle; Generation interval; Genetic improvement; Genomic selection; Holstein

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL HEALTH; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY CATTLE; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC GAIN; GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOMICS; HOLSTEIN CATTLE; LIFESPAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BOVINE; DAIRYING; GENETICS; MALE; MILK; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; MALE; MILK; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84978079753     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611570113     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. Brotherstone S, Goddard M (2005) Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1459):1479-1488.
2. Robertson A, Rendel JM (1950) The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle. J Genet 50(1):21-31.
3. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4):1819-1829.
4. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP (1997) Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J Anim Sci 75(7):1738-1745.
5. König S, Simianer H, Willam A (2009) Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J Dairy Sci 92(1):382-391.
6. Schaeffer LR (2006) Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 123(4):218-223.
7. Meuwissen T, Goddard M (2010) Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185(2):623-631.
8. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009) Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci 92(2):433-443.
9. Wiggans GR, Vanraden PM, Cooper TA (2011) The genomic evaluation system in the United States: Past, present, future. J Dairy Sci 94(6):3202-3211.
10. de Roos AP, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF, van Arendonk JA (2011) Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls. J Dairy Sci 94(3):1559-1567.
11. Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW, Hayes BJ (2010) Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. J Dairy Sci 93(11):5455-5466.
12. VanRaden PM, et al. (2009) Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 92(1):16-24.
13. Hutchison JL, Cole JB, Bickhart DM (2014) Short communication: Use of young bulls in the United States. J Dairy Sci 97(5):3213-3220.
14. Rendel JM, Robertson A (1950) Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. J Genet 50(1):1-8.
15. Van Tassell CP, Van Vleck LD (1991) Estimates of genetic selection differentials and generation intervals for four paths of selection. J Dairy Sci 74(3):1078-1086.
16. Hodgson RE (1964) Past, present, and future of the dairy herd improvement section. J Dairy Sci 47(3):310-315.
17. Miglior F, Muir BL, Van Doormaal BJ (2005) Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. J Dairy Sci 88(3):1255-1263.
18. Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Norman HD (1999) Method R estimates of heritability for milk, fat, and protein yields of United States dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 82(10):2231-2237.
19. Welper RD, Freeman AE (1992) Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holsteins, including lactose and somatic cell score. J Dairy Sci 75(5):1342-1348.
20. Kuhn MT, Boettcher PJ, Freeman AE (1994) Potential biases in predicted transmitting abilities of females from preferential treatment. J Dairy Sci 77(8):2428-2437.
21. Pedersen GA, Christensen LG, Petersen PH (1995) Evaluation of breeding value and selection of bull dams in the Danish dairy breeds: I. Studies on realized efficiency of bull dam and bull sire selection. Acta Agric Scand 45(1):26-31.
22. Hadley GL, Wolf CA, Harsh SB (2006) Dairy cattle culling patterns, explanations, and implications. J Dairy Sci 89(6):2286-2296.
23. Johnson LA, Welch GR (1999) Sex preselection: High-speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y sperm for maximum efficiency. Theriogenology 52(8):1323-1341.
24. Seidel GE, Jr (1981) Superovulation and embryo transfer in cattle. Science 211(4480):351-358.
25. Pieterse MC, Kappen KA, Kruip TA, Taverne MA (1988) Aspiration of bovine oocytes during transvaginal ultrasound scanning of the ovaries. Theriogenology 30(4):751-762.
26. Pritchard T, Coffey M, Mrode R, Wall E (2013) Understanding the genetics of survival in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 96(5):3296-3309.
27. Vitezica ZG, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A (2011) Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genet Res 93(5):357-366.
28. VanRaden PM, Wright JR (2013) Measuring genomic pre-selection in theory and in practice. Interbull Bulletin 47:147-150.
29. Aguilar I, et al. (2010) Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 93(2):743-752.
30. Wiggans GR, Cooper TA, Vanraden PM, Cole JB (2011) Technical note: Adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 94(12):6188-6193.
31. Schutz MM (1994) Genetic evaluation of somatic cell scores for United States dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 77(7):2113-2129.
32. Shook GE, Schutz MM (1994) Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. J Dairy Sci 77(2):648-658.
33. Miller RH, Norman HD, Wright JR, Cole JB (2009) Impact of genetic merit for milk somatic cell score of sires and maternal grandsires on herd life of their daughters. J Dairy Sci 92(5):2224-2228.
34. Hogeveen H, Huijps K, Lam TJ (2011) Economic aspects of mastitis: New developments. N Z Vet J 59(1):16-23.
35. VanRaden PM (2004) Invited review: Selection on net merit to improve lifetime profit. J Dairy Sci 87(10):3125-3131.
36. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR (1995) Productive life evaluations: Calculation, accuracy, and economic value. J Dairy Sci 78(3):631-638.
37. Weigel KA, Lawlor TJ, Jr, Vanraden PM, Wiggans GR (1998) Use of linear type and production data to supplement early predicted transmitting abilities for productive life. J Dairy Sci 81(7):2040-2044.
38. Dimitri C, Venezia KM (2007) Retail and Consumer Aspects of the Organic Milk Market/LDP-M-155-01 (US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC).
39. Hurnik JF, Lehman H (1988) Ethics and farm animal welfare. J Agric Ethics 1(4):305-318.
40. VanRaden PM, et al. (2004) Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. J Dairy Sci 87(7):2285-2292.
41. Lucy MC (2001) Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? J Dairy Sci 84(6):1277-1293.
42. VanRaden PM, Smith LA (1999) Selection and mating considering expected inbreeding of future progeny. J Dairy Sci 82(12):2771-2778.
43. VanRaden PM, Olson KM, Wiggans GR, Cole JB, Tooker ME (2011) Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci 94(11):5673-5682.
44. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN (2000) Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 19(3):335-351.
45. Georges M, Massey JM (1991) Velogenetics, or the synergistic use of marker assisted selection and germ-line manipulation. Theriogenology 35(1):151-159.
46. Haley CS, Visscher PM (1998) Strategies to utilize marker-quantitative trait loci associations. J Dairy Sci 81(Suppl 2):85-97.
47. Campbell KH, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I (1996) Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380(6569):64-66.
48. Wiggans GR, Misztal I, Van Vleck LD (1988) Implementation of an animal model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci 71(Suppl 2):54-69.
49. SAS Institute (2014) SAS/STAT 13.2 User's Guide (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
50. Boichard D, Bonaiti B, Barbat A, Mattalia S (1995) Three methods to validate the estimation of genetic trend for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 78(2):431-437.
51. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, London).