Long-term outcomes of the Boston Type I keratoprosthesis in the management of corneal limbal stem cell deficiency

Cornea

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1156-1164

  Aravena, Carolina ^a,b   Bozkurt, Tahir Kansu ^a   Yu, Fei ^a   Aldave, Anthony J ^a  

^a JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Boston type I keratoprosthesis; limbal stem cell deficiency

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOSTON TYPE I KERATOPROSTHESIS; COMORBIDITY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA LIMBUS; CORNEA NECROSIS; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; CORNEAL LIMBAL STEM CELL DEFICIENCY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; KERATOPLASTY; KERATOPROSTHESIS; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL ACUITY; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHILD; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION DISORDERS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHILD; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84978052477     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000933     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Falcinelli G, Falsini B, TaloniM, et al. Modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis for treatment of corneal blindness: long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in 181 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123: 1319-1329
2. Michael R, Charoenrook V, de la Paz MF, et al. Long-term functional and anatomical results of osteo- and osteoodonto-keratoprosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246: 1133-1137
3. Liu C, Okera S, Tandon R, et al. Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis: results from the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92: 1211-1217
4. Sejpal K, Yu F, Aldave AJ. The Boston keratoprosthesis in the management of corneal limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea. 2011; 30: 1187-1194
5. Solomon A, Ellies P, Anderson DF, et al. Long-term outcome of keratolimbal allograft with or without penetrating keratoplasty for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1159-1166
6. Ilari L, Daya SM. Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1278-1284
7. Han ES, Wee WR, Lee JH, et al. Long-term outcome and prognostic factor analysis for keratolimbal allografts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 249: 1697-1704
8. Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA). Eye Banking Statistical Report. Washington, DC: Eye Bank Association of America; 2014
9. Aldave AJ, Sangwan VS, Basu S, et al. International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 1530-1538
10. Law SK, Huang JS, Nassiri N, et al. Technique of combined glaucoma tube shunt and keratoprosthesis implantation. J Glaucoma. 2014; 23: 501-507
11. Kim MJ, Yu F, Aldave AJ. Microbial keratitis after Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation: incidence, organisms, risk factors, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120: 2209-2216
12. Alexander JK, Basak SK, Padilla MD, et al. International outcomes of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Cornea. 2015; 34: 1387-1394
13. Rootman DB, Kim MJ, Aldave AJ, et al. Ocular surface, fornix, and eyelid rehabilitation in Boston type I keratoprosthesis patients with mucous membrane disease. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 31: 43-49
14. Rudnisky CJ, Belin MW, Todani A, et al. Risk factors for the development of retroprosthetic membranes with Boston keratoprosthesis type I: multicenter study results. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 951-955
15. Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC, et al. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 640-651
16. DiLoreto DA Jr, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al. Use of best and final visual acuity outcomes in ophthalmological research. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003; 121: 1586-1590
17. Jabs DA. Improving the reporting of clinical case series. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139: 900-905
18. Belin MW, Güell JL, Grabner G. Suggested guidelines for reporting keratoprosthesis results: Consensus Opinion of the Cornea Society, Asia Cornea Society, EuCornea, PanCornea, and the KPRO Study Group. Cornea. 2016; 35: 143-144
19. Maruyama-Hosoi F, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, et al. Changes observed in keratolimbal allograft. Cornea. 2006; 25: 377-382
20. Shi W, Gao H, Wang T, et al. Combined penetrating keratoplasty and keratolimbal allograft transplantation in comparison with corneoscleral transplantation in the treatment of severe eye burns. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008; 36: 501-507
21. Biber JM, Skeens HM, Neff KD, et al. The cincinnati procedure: technique and outcomes of combined living-related conjunctival limbal allografts and keratolimbal allografts in severe ocular surface failure. Cornea. 2011; 30: 765-771
22. Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Nakamura T, et al. Visual improvement after cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120: 193-200
23. Satake Y, Higa K, Tsubota K, et al. Long-term outcome of cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheet transplantation in treatment of total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 1524-1530
24. Burillon C, Huot L, Justin V, et al. Cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet (CAOMECS) transplantation for the treatment of corneal limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 1325-1331
25. Pauklin M, Fuchsluger TA, Westekemper H, et al. Midterm results of cultivated autologous and allogeneic limbal epithelial transplantation in limbal stem cell deficiency. Dev Ophthalmol. 2010; 45: 57-70
26. Sharma S, Tandon R, Mohanty S, et al. Culture of corneal limbal epithelial stem cells: experience from benchtop to bedside in a tertiary care hospital in India. Cornea. 2011; 30: 1223-1232