GAPIT version 2: An enhanced integrated tool for genomic association and prediction

Plant Genome

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Tang, You ^a   Liu, Xiaolei ^b,c   Wang, Jiabo ^d   Li, Meng ^f   Wang, Qishan ^e,g   Tian, Feng ^h   Su, Zhongbin ^a   Pan, Yuchun ^g   Liu, Di ^e   Lipka, Alexander E ⁱ   Buckler, Edward S ^c,j   Zhang, Zhiwu ^d,k  

^a NORTHEAST AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

^d North East Agricultural Univ   (China)

^e HEILONGJIANG ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (China)

^f NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^g SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^h CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^j AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^k WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; HUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRENDS;

GENOME; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84978044756     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19403372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.11.0120     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arthur, K., B.J. Vilhjálmsson, V. Segura, A. Platt, Q. Long, and M. Nordborg. 2012. A mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies of correlated traits in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 44:1066-1071. doi:10.1038/ng.2376
2. Atwell, S., Y.S. Huang, B.J. Vilhjalmsson, G. Willems, M. Horton, Y. Li, et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465:627-631. doi:10.1038/ nature08800
3. Bradbury, P.J., Z. Zhang, D.E. Kroon, T.M. Casstevens, Y. Ramdoss, and E.S. Buckler. 2007. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23(19):2633-2635. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
4. Cantor, R.M., K. Lange, and J.S. Sinsheimer. 2010. Prioritizing GWAS results: a review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86(1):6-22. doi:10.1016/j. ajhg.2009.11.017
5. Endelman, J. 2011. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection in the R package rrBLUP. Plant Gen. 4:250-255. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024
6. Falush, D., M. Stephens, and J.K. Pritchard. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Dominant markers and null alleles. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7(4):574-578. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
7. Georges, M. 2014. Towards sequence-based genomic selection of cattle. Nat. Genet. 46(8):807-809. doi:10.1038/ng.3048
8. Groth, D., S. Hartmann, S. Klie, and J. Selbig. 2013. Principal components analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 930(May):527-547. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_22
9. Kang, H.M., J.H. Sul, S.K. Service, N.A. Zaitlen, S.-Y. Kong, N.B. Freimer, et al. 2010. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42:348-354. doi:10.1038/ng.548
10. Kang, H.M., N.A. Zaitlen, C.M. Wade, A. Kirby, D. Heckerman, M.J. Daly, et al. 2008. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178:1709-1723. doi:10.1534/genetics. 107.080101
11. Li, M., X. Liu, P. Bradbury, J. Yu, Y.-M. Zhang, R.J. Todhunter, et al. 2014. Enrichment of statistical power for genome-wide association studies. BMC Biol. 12(1):73. doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0073-5
12. Lipka, A.E., F. Tian, Q. Wang, J. Peiffer, M. Li, P.J. Bradbury, et al. 2012. GAPIT: Genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28(18):2397-2399. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444
13. Lippert, C., J. Listgarten, Y. Liu, C.M. Kadie, R.I. Davidson, and D. Heckerman. 2011. FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Methods 8(10):833-835. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1681
14. Listgarten, J., C. Lippert, C.M. Kadie, R.I. Davidson, E. Eskin, and D. Heckerman. 2012. Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Methods 9(6):525-526. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2037
15. Misztal, I., A Legarra, and I. Aguilar. 2009. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci. 92(9):4648-4655. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2064
16. Ober, U., J.F. Ayroles, E.A. Stone, S. Richards, D. Zhu, R.A. Gibbs, et al. 2012. Using whole-genome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8(5):E1002685. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685
17. Poland, J., J. Endelman, J. Dawson, J. Rutkoski, S.Y. Wu, Y. Manes, et al. 2012. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotypingby-sequencing. Plant Gen. 5(3):103-113. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2012.06.0006
18. Purcell, S., B. Neale, K. Todd-Brown, L. Thomas, M.A.R. Ferreira, D. Bender, et al. 2007. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81(3):559-575. doi:10.1086/519795
19. Segura, V., B.J. Vilhjálmsson, A. Platt, A. Korte, Ü. Seren, Q. Long, et al. 2012. An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genomewide association studies in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 44(7):825-830. doi:10.1038/ng.2314
20. Shendure, J., R.D. Mitra, C. Varma, and G.M. Church. 2004. Advanced sequencing technologies: Methods and goals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5(5):335-344. doi:10.1038/nrg1325
21. Svishcheva, G.R., T.I. Axenovich, N.M. Belonogova, C.M. van Duijn, and Y.S. Aulchenko. 2012. Rapid variance components-based method for whole-genome association analysis. Nat. Genet. 44(10):1166-1170. doi:10.1038/ng.2410
22. VanRaden, P.M., C.P. Van Tassell, G.R. Wiggans, T.S. Sonstegard, R.D. Schnabel, J.F. Taylor, et al. 2009. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 92(1):16-24. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1514
23. Wang, Q., F. Tian, Y. Pan, E.S. Buckler, and Z. Zhang. 2014. A SUPER powerful method for genome wide association study. PLoS ONE 9(9):E107684. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107684
24. Yang, J., N.A. Zaitlen, M.E. Goddard, P.M. Visscher, and A.L. Price. 2014. Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods. Nat. Genet. 46:100-106. doi:10.1038/ng.2876
25. Yu, J., G. Pressoir, W.H. Briggs, I. Vroh Bi, M. Yamasaki, J.F. Doebley, et al. 2006. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38:203-208. doi:10.1038/ng1702
26. Zhang, Z., E. Ersoz, C.Q. Lai, R.J. Todhunter, H.K. Tiwari, M.A. Gore, et al. 2010. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42(4):355-360. doi:10.1038/ng.546
27. Zhou X., and M. Stephens. 2012. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 44(7):821-824. doi:10.1038/ng.2310.