The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of LandmarIdentification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images

Iranian Journal of Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Nikneshan, Sima ^a   Mohseni, Sudeh ^b   Nouri, Mahtab ^a   Hadian, Hoora ^c   Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad ^d  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Emboss Enhancement; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ATORVASTATIN;

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION CENTER; LOWER LIP; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHODONTIST; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; SOFT TISSUE; SPINE; UPPER LIP;

EID: 84977874410     PISSN: 17351065     EISSN: 20082711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.19302     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Macri V, Wenzel A. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15(2):137–48.
2. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC, Chang HF. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(5):301–6.
3. Gijbels F, Bou Serhal C, Willems G, Bosmans H, Sanderink G, Persoons M, et al. Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(2):101–5.
4. Jackson PH, Dickson GC, Birnie DJ. Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report. Br J Orthod. 1985;12(3):122–32.
5. Leonardi RM, Giordano D, Maiorana F, Greco M. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(3):242–7.
6. Ryu HS, Hwang HS. Reproducibility of Lateral Cephalometric Landmarks According to Radiographic Image Enhancement. Korean J Orthod. 2002;32(1):59–69.
7. Weisemann RB, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman TT, Farman AG. Effect of pixel histogram distribution on perceived anatomical landmark clarity of photostimulable phosphor cephalograms. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2006;1(2):97–103.
8. Menig JJ. The DenOptix digital radiographic system. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33(7):407–10.
9. Wiesemann RB, Scheetz JP, Sanderink G, Farman AG. Cephalometric landmark clarity in photostimulable phosphor images using pseudo-color and emboss enhancements. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2006;1(2):105–12.
10. Sato E, Osawa A, Matsukiyo H, Enomoto T, Watanabe M, Sato S, et al. Embossed radiography utilizing an image-shifting subtraction program. Nucl Instrum Methods.2010;619(1-3):133–9.
11. Osawa A, Watanabe M, Sato E, Matsukiyo H, Enomoto T, Nagao J, et al. Embossed radiography utilizing energy subtraction. Radiol Phys Technol. 2009;2(1):77–86.
12. Shin JW, Choi HM, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi HB, Choi SC. Reproducibility of lateral cephalometric landmarks on conventional radiographs and spatial frequency-processed digital images. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2002.
13. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(5):387–92.
14. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(5):262–73.
15. Visser H, Rodig T, Hermann KP. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(3):159–63.