Cephalometric landmark clarity in photostimulable phosphor images using pseudo-color and emboss enhancements

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 105-112

  Wiesemann, Ryan B ^a   Scheetz, James P ^a   Silveira, Anibal ^a   Farman, Taeko T ^a   Farman, Allan G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cephalometrics; Digital image enhancement; Orthodontics; Photostimulable phosphor; Radiographic

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747061526     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-006-0042-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Schaetzing R (2003) Computed radiography technology. Advances in digital radiography categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics (2003 syllabus). In: Annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, pp 7-22
2. Cowen AR, Workman A, Price JS (1993) Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography. Br J Radiol 66:332-345
3. Kato H, Miyahara J, Takano, M (1985) New computed radiography using scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Neurosurg Rev 8:53-62
4. Tateno Y, Iinuma TA, Takano M (1987) Computed radiography, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
5. Kogutt MS, Jones JP, Perkins DD (1988) Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging. Am J Roentgenol 151:775-779
6. Lim KF, Foong KW (1997) Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification. Br J Orthod 24:301-308
7. Naslund EB, Kruger M, Petersson A, Hansen K (1998) Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:136-139
8. Wenzel A, Sewerin I (1991) Source of noise in digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 71:503-508
9. Delgado M (2001) Single versus twin peak histograms: orthodontic measurement accuracy using photostimulable phosphor lateral cephalograms. Masters Thesis, University of Louisville Graduate School
10. Halazonetis D (2005) What do 8-bit and 12-bit grayscale mean and which should I use when scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:387-388
11. Menig J (1999) The DenOptix digital radiographic system. J Clin Orthod 33:407-410
12. Crozier S (1999) Is it time yet? Digital X-rays are here to stay, but how do you decide when to switch radiography systems? ADA News, 28-32
13. Siegel EL, Reiner BI (2001) Educational exhibit at the 18th symposium for computer applications in radiology, Salt Lake City
14. Farman TT, Farman AG (2000) Optimal processing and enhancement of 16-bit photostimulable phosphor images. Radiology 217(P):657
15. West KD (2003) Post-processing contrast enhancements in 8-bit and 16-bit photostimulable phosphor cephalograms. Masters Thesis, University of Louisville Graduate School
16. Reddy MS, Bruch JM, Jeffcoat MK, Williams RC (1991) Contrast as an aid to interpretation in digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 71:763-769
17. Scarfe WC, Czerniejewski VJ, Farman AG, Avant SL, Molteni R (1999) In vivo accuracy and reliability of color-coded image enhancements for the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:603-611