The future of Russian science through the prism of public policy

Foresight

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 320-339

  Gershman, Mikhail ^a   Kuznetsova, Tatiana ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Efficient contract; Performance related pay; Research evaluation; Russian science; S T policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977558022     PISSN: 14636689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/FS-06-2014-0037     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Akerlof, G.A. (1982), “Labor contracts as partial gift exchange”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 97 No. 4, pp. 543-569.
2. Amanatidou, E., Butter, M., Carabias, V., Konnola, T., Leis, M., Saritas, O.Schaper-Rinkel, P. and van Rij, V. (2012), “On concepts and methods in horizon scanning: lessons from initiating policy dialogues on emerging issues”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 208-221.
3. Andersen, L.B. and Pallesen, T. (2008), “Not just for the money? How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions”, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 28-47.
4. Auranen, O. and Nieminen, M. (2010), “University research funding and publication performance – an international comparison”, Research Policy, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 822-834.
5. Bonaccorsi, A. (2007), Researchers (part 1 and part 2). The Future of Key Research Actors in the European Research Area, European Commission, Brussels, pp. 37-68.
6. Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO (2014), The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor In Innovation, second printing, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva.
7. Freeman, C. (1987), Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 330-334.
8. Freeman, C. (1995), “The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 5-24.
9. Georghiou, L. (2008), “Europe’s research system must change”, Nature Vol. 452 No. 24, pp. 935-936.
10. Georghiou, L. (2013), “Challenges for science and innovation policy”, in Meissner, D., Gokhberg, L., Sokolov, A. (Eds), Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future, Springer, Berlin.
11. Gershman, M. (2013), “Innovation development programmes for the state-owned companies: first results”, Foresight-Russia, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 28-43.
12. Gershman, M. and Kuznetsova, T. (2013), “Efficient contracting in the R&D sector: key parameters”, Foresight-Russia, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 26-36.
13. Gokhberg, L. and Kuznetsova, T. (2011), “S&T and innovation in russia: key challenges of the post-crisis period”, Journal of East-West Business, Vol. 17 Nos 2/3, pp. 73-89.
14. Gokhberg, L., Kitova, G., Kuznetsova, T. and Shuvalova, O. (2010), The Russian Scientists: Sketches to a Sociological Portrait, Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
15. Gokhberg, L., Gorodnikova, N., Kitova, G., Kuznetsova, I., Kuznetsova, T. and Sokolov, A. (2011), Domestic science and science policy in the late twentieth century: Trends and patterns of development (1985–1999), Moscow State University, Moscow.
16. Gokhberg, L. and Nekipelova, E. (2002), “Surveying the emigration of researchers: the Russian experience”, paper for the OECD Workshop on Human Resources Devoted to S&T, Center for Science Research and Statistics, Moscow.
17. Gokhberg, L. and Roud, V. (2012), “The Russian federation: a new innovation policy for sustainable growth”, in Dutta, S. and Berger, R. (Eds), Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, pp. 121-131.
18. Guinet, J. (2012), “Adapting public research institutes to new dynamics of innovation”, STI Policy Review, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 117-138.
19. Harkness, P. and Schier, M. (2011), “Performance related pay in Australian universities”, Australian Universities’ Review, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 50-58.
20. Hashimoto, M. and Yu, B.T. (1980), “Specific capital, employment contracts, and wage rigidity”, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 536-549.
21. Hicks, D. (2012), “Performance-based university research funding systems”, Research Policy, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 251-261.
22. HSE (2013), Science, Innovation and Information Society: Data Book, Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
23. HSE (2014), Science and Technology Indicators in the Russian Federation: Data Book, Higher School of Economics, Moscow.
24. Hughes, T.P. (1989), American Genesis, Viking, New York, NY.
25. Hvistendahl, M. (2013), “China’s Publication bazaar”, Science, Vol. 342 No. 6162, pp. 1035-1039.
26. Ingvarson, L., Kleinhenz, E. and Wilkinson, J. (2007), “Research on performance pay for teachers”, available at: http://research.acer.edu.au/workforce/1 (accessed 14 February 2014).
27. Kotsemir, M. (2012), “Dynamics of Russian and world science through the prism of international publications”, Foresight-Russia, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 38-58.
28. Kurbatova, M. and Levin, S. (2013), “Effective contract in higher education of the Russian federation: theoretical approaches and features of institutional design”, Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 55-80.
29. Kuzminov, Y. (2012), “Academic community and contracts: modern challenges”, in Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., Yudkevich, M., Androushchak, G. and Pacheco, I.F. (Eds), Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison of Compensation and Contracts, Routledge, London, pp. 331-340.
30. Langbein, L. (2008), “Management by results: student evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance”, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 417-428.
31. Lundvall, B-Å. (1992), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publishers, London.
32. Marsden, D. (2004), “The role of performance related pay in renegotiating the ‘effort bargain’: the case of the british public service”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 350-370.
33. Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics, 8th ed., Macmillan and Co., London.
34. Metcalfe, S. (1995), “The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives”, in Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford/Cambridge.
35. Nauwelaers, C., Boekholt, P., Mostert, B., Cunningham, P., Guy, K., Hofer, R. and Rammer, C. (2009), “Policy mixes for R&D in Europe”, Report to European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, available at: www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1249471847_policy_mixes_rd_ue_2009.pdf (accessed 14 February 2014).
36. Nelson, R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, NY/Oxford.
37. OECD (2005), “Paying for performance: policies for government employees”, Policy Brief, available at: www.oecd.org/gov/pem/34910926.pdf (accessed 14 February 2014).
38. OECD (2011), “Public research institutions: mapping sector trends”, available at: www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/publicresearchinstitutionsmappingsectortrends.htm (accessed 14 February 2014).
39. OECD (2012a), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_outlook-2012-en (accessed 14 February 2014).
40. OECD (2012b), “Does performance-based pay improve teaching?”, PISA in Focus, available at: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/does-performance-based-pay-improve-teaching_5k98q27r2stb-en (accessed 14 February 2014).
41. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1994), “The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems”, STI Review, No. 14, OECD, Paris.
42. Perry, J.L., Engbers, T.A. and Jun, So, Y. (2009), “Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 39-51.
43. Randle, K. (1997), “Rewarding failure: operating a performance-related pay system in pharmaceutical research”, Personnel Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 187-200.
44. Salop, S.C. (1979), “A model of the natural rate of unemployment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 117-125.
45. Schlicht, E. (1978), “Labor turnover, wage structure and natural unemployment”, Zeitschrift fur die Gesamte Staatswissewnschaft, Vol. 134 No. 2, pp. 337-346.
46. Shapiro, C. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1984), “Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 433-444.
47. Smart, W. (2009), “The impact of the performance-based research fund on the research productivity of New Zealand Universities”, available at: www. educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/tertiary_education/49897 (accessed 14 February 2014).
48. Springer, M.G., Ballou, D., Hamilton, L., Le, V., Lockwood, J.R., McCaffrey, D., Pepper, M. and Stecher, B. (2010), Teacher Pay for Performance: Experimental Evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching, National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
49. Stiglitz, J.E. (1974), “Alternative theories of wage determination and unemployment in L.D.C.’s: the labor turnover model”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 194-227.
50. Stokes, D.E. (1993), Pasteur’s Quadrant: A Study in Policy Science Ideas, Mimeo, Princeton University.
51. Weiss, A. (1980), “Job queues and layoffs in labor markets with flexible wages”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88 No. 3, pp. 526-538.
52. Weiss, A. (1990), Efficiency Wages: Models of Unemployment, Layoffs, and Wage Dispersion, Princeton University Press, NJ.